Anyone read through Garner's legal writing stuff? Any thoughts on his methods - specifically the process below, and it's application on exams?
Madman - Creatively drop as many ideas on paper as possible within your allotted time without structure. A frienzied initial response to a stimulus or fact pattern.
Architect - Structure ideas into clear, linear (readable) narrative.
Carpenter - Forced evolution of ideas and simple application of fact to law to well-written narrative. (This is the primary process, although Garner relates each as equally important).
Judge - Basic proofreading/re-wording/clean-up.
I'm going to run through leews in July, and thought I'd ask for thoughts from the field on integrating this strategy into my writing. I appreciate this style. Thanks all.
The Madman and the Architect. Forum
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:07 am
Re: The Madman and the Architect.
While Garner is an excellent source on writing in general, it's unlikely you'll have anywhere close to enough time to follow his model on exams.
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:16 am
Re: The Madman and the Architect.
You should IRAC literally everything. Practice now in law school so you don't fail the bar exam because your essay writing skills for legal exams blows shit