Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home		Law School
Admissions		Law
Schools		Law
Students		TLS
Forums		 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Students and Graduates » Forum for Law School Students

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 17
  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
honestapplicant
 Post subject: .
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:41 pm
Posts: 15
.


Last edited by honestapplicant on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:08 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
martinriggs
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:18 pm
Posts: 5
honestapplicant wrote:
If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?


the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer. :mrgreen:
Top
 Profile  
 
MrPapagiorgio
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am
Posts: 2725
Burned.
Top
 Profile  
 
uk4220
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:32 pm
Posts: 29
So now you're just an IP lookup away from being kicked out of law school.
Top
 Profile  
 
honestapplicant
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:41 pm
Posts: 15
.


Last edited by honestapplicant on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
alabamabound
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 154
martinriggs wrote:
honestapplicant wrote:
If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?


the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer. :mrgreen:


Username irony ftw.
Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Pancakes
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm
Posts: 8412
honestapplicant wrote:
i figured it out thx

you are done.
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
TTTLS
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am
Posts: 1777
Cot damn!
Top
 Profile  
 
Bildungsroman
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Posts: 13063
It's not at all suspicious that you immediately went back and wiped all your old posts. LOL
Top
 Profile  
 
Sapientia
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 197
martinriggs wrote:
honestapplicant wrote:
If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?


the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer. :mrgreen:


QFT
Top
 Profile  
 
Jessuf
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:59 am 
Offline
Love me, Tinder?
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:27 pm
Posts: 7514
so do you go to Duke?
Top
 Profile  
 
Sapientia
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 197
Jessuf wrote:
so do you go to Duke?


Funny thing is.. the question isnt that diffiult. Definitely not worth asking on TLS and risking your nuts. I suppose any question isn't worth that; but, still, I think I oculd have come up with a decent answer to that question - and I haven't paid much attention in conlaw this semester.
Top
 Profile  
 
lobolawyer
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 152
Bildungsroman wrote:
It's not at all suspicious that you immediately went back and wiped all your old posts. LOL
Top
 Profile  
 
tyro
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:23 am
Posts: 2148
alabamabound wrote:
Username irony ftw.

Yeah..when someone feels like they have to say they're honest or humble in their username you kind of wonder why they thought it was something to be questioned in the first place.
Top
 Profile  
 
Br3v
 Post subject: Re: Con law help?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Posts: 5182
tyro wrote:
alabamabound wrote:
Username irony ftw.

Yeah..when someone feels like they have to say they're honest or humble in their username you kind of wonder why they thought it was something to be questioned in the first place.


Data?

Joke
Top
 Profile  
 
dabomb75
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:56 pm
Posts: 438
haha he wiped every single post he's made. Wonder if someone really wanted to catch this person how hard it would actually be
Top
 Profile  
 
TTTLS
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am
Posts: 1777
How terrible would it be if martinriggs was OP's professor? It's like my nightmare to get sniped by a prof. on here.


Last edited by TTTLS on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
tyro
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:23 am
Posts: 2148
dabomb75 wrote:
Wonder if someone really wanted to catch this person how hard it would actually be


Verity wrote:
honestapplicant wrote:

Yes, the obligatory witty TLS response

next


I like how OP has two total posts, but implies a strong familiarity with the ways of TLS. Something's a-brewin'.....

I would say it's someone who had another username on here and then made a new one to post some shit anonomously. I wouldn't be that surprised if f7 already knew who it was and made a special file for them :P
Top
 Profile  
 
angrybird
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:15 am
Posts: 568
i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.
Top
 Profile  
 
Ludovico Technique
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:10 am 
Offline
Pockets full of 180s
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 6704
angrybird wrote:
i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+1. Streisand effect
Top
 Profile  
 
Extension_Cord
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:15 pm
Posts: 662
angrybird wrote:
i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+2
Top
 Profile  
 
lobolawyer
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 152
Extension_Cord wrote:
angrybird wrote:
i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+2


Legendary.
Top
 Profile  
 
beachbum
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2838
See, now I just want to figure out who this is. That's sketchy as hell. Honor code, bro.
Top
 Profile  
 
ben4847
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm
Posts: 1343
edited:
angrybird wrote:
i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


Last edited by ben4847 on Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Kikero
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am
Posts: 1365
ben4847 wrote:
Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.
Top
 Profile  
 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 17
  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next

Board index » Students and Graduates » Forum for Law School Students

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB