.

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
honestapplicant
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:41 pm

.

Postby honestapplicant » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:19 pm

.
Last edited by honestapplicant on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:08 am, edited 3 times in total.

martinriggs
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:18 pm

Re: Con law help?

Postby martinriggs » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:27 pm

honestapplicant wrote:If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?


the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer. :mrgreen:

User avatar
MrPapagiorgio
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am

Re: Con law help?

Postby MrPapagiorgio » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:33 pm

Burned.

User avatar
uk4220
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:32 pm

Re: Con law help?

Postby uk4220 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:37 pm

So now you're just an IP lookup away from being kicked out of law school.

honestapplicant
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:41 pm

Re: Con law help?

Postby honestapplicant » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:38 pm

.
Last edited by honestapplicant on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

alabamabound
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: Con law help?

Postby alabamabound » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:05 pm

martinriggs wrote:
honestapplicant wrote:If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?


the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer. :mrgreen:


Username irony ftw.

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: .

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:09 pm

honestapplicant wrote:i figured it out thx

you are done.
--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
TTTLS
Posts: 539
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am

Re: .

Postby TTTLS » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:46 am

Cot damn!

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5482
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: .

Postby Bildungsroman » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:51 am

It's not at all suspicious that you immediately went back and wiped all your old posts. LOL

User avatar
Sapientia
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: Con law help?

Postby Sapientia » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:57 am

martinriggs wrote:
honestapplicant wrote:If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?


the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer. :mrgreen:


QFT

User avatar
Jessuf
Posts: 9680
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:27 pm

Re: .

Postby Jessuf » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:59 am

so do you go to Duke?

User avatar
Sapientia
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: .

Postby Sapientia » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:04 am

Jessuf wrote:so do you go to Duke?


Funny thing is.. the question isnt that diffiult. Definitely not worth asking on TLS and risking your nuts. I suppose any question isn't worth that; but, still, I think I oculd have come up with a decent answer to that question - and I haven't paid much attention in conlaw this semester.

lobolawyer
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: .

Postby lobolawyer » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:12 am

Bildungsroman wrote:It's not at all suspicious that you immediately went back and wiped all your old posts. LOL

User avatar
tyro
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Con law help?

Postby tyro » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:17 am

alabamabound wrote:Username irony ftw.

Yeah..when someone feels like they have to say they're honest or humble in their username you kind of wonder why they thought it was something to be questioned in the first place.

User avatar
Br3v
Posts: 3536
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Con law help?

Postby Br3v » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:19 am

tyro wrote:
alabamabound wrote:Username irony ftw.

Yeah..when someone feels like they have to say they're honest or humble in their username you kind of wonder why they thought it was something to be questioned in the first place.


Data?

Joke

User avatar
dabomb75
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:56 pm

Re: .

Postby dabomb75 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:31 am

haha he wiped every single post he's made. Wonder if someone really wanted to catch this person how hard it would actually be

User avatar
TTTLS
Posts: 539
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am

Re: .

Postby TTTLS » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:59 am

How terrible would it be if martinriggs was OP's professor? It's like my nightmare to get sniped by a prof. on here.
Last edited by TTTLS on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
tyro
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:23 am

Re: .

Postby tyro » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:06 am

dabomb75 wrote:Wonder if someone really wanted to catch this person how hard it would actually be


Verity wrote:
honestapplicant wrote:
Yes, the obligatory witty TLS response

next


I like how OP has two total posts, but implies a strong familiarity with the ways of TLS. Something's a-brewin'.....

I would say it's someone who had another username on here and then made a new one to post some shit anonomously. I wouldn't be that surprised if f7 already knew who it was and made a special file for them :P

User avatar
angrybird
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:15 am

Re: .

Postby angrybird » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:07 am

i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.

User avatar
Ludo!
Posts: 5395
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: .

Postby Ludo! » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:10 am

angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+1. Streisand effect

User avatar
Extension_Cord
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:15 pm

Re: .

Postby Extension_Cord » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:31 am

angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+2

lobolawyer
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: .

Postby lobolawyer » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:33 am

Extension_Cord wrote:
angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+2


Legendary.

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2779
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:48 pm

See, now I just want to figure out who this is. That's sketchy as hell. Honor code, bro.

User avatar
ben4847
Posts: 789
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm

Re: .

Postby ben4847 » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:53 pm

edited:
angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.
Last edited by ben4847 on Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kikero
Posts: 1364
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am

Re: .

Postby Kikero » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:56 pm

ben4847 wrote:Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 6 guests