I can't seem to figure out what the difference is between contributions and expenditures in the reasoning of Buckley... The Court reasoned, according to Chemerinsky, that expenditure limits are a substantial restraint on political speech, while contribution limits have little direct restraint on political speech. Why? I don't get it... HELP!
Thanks in advance to you Con Law geniuses.
1 post • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:36 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests