Civ Pro Personal Jurisdiction Question

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am

Civ Pro Personal Jurisdiction Question

Postby BCLS » Tue May 10, 2011 2:34 pm

Hi Guys,

I have seen two standards, "arise out of," or "arise out of, or relate to," to describe specific jurisdiction. The most common appears to be the former, but I read one case where the latter was mentioned. Obviously the latter is much broader and would be advantageous for a plaintiff in many ways.

My question is: which is correct? is there no consensus and on an exam it is best to note the two interpretations? Thanks guys.

Posts: 387
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: Civ Pro Personal Jurisdiction Question

Postby jkay » Tue May 10, 2011 2:53 pm

PJ is mushy, the more arguments for BOTH SIDES you can throw around, the more points you will get.

Don't forget that before a claim "arises from" an action, the actor usually has to "avail themselves of the benefits and protections" of the forum state.

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests