Hi Guys,
I have seen two standards, "arise out of," or "arise out of, or relate to," to describe specific jurisdiction. The most common appears to be the former, but I read one case where the latter was mentioned. Obviously the latter is much broader and would be advantageous for a plaintiff in many ways.
My question is: which is correct? is there no consensus and on an exam it is best to note the two interpretations? Thanks guys.
Civ Pro Personal Jurisdiction Question Forum
-
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 2:47 pm
Re: Civ Pro Personal Jurisdiction Question
PJ is mushy, the more arguments for both sides you can throw around, the more points you will get.
Don't forget that before a claim "arises from" an action, the actor usually has to "avail themselves of the benefits and protections" of the forum state.
Don't forget that before a claim "arises from" an action, the actor usually has to "avail themselves of the benefits and protections" of the forum state.