White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises Forum
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2011/ ... eed-raise/
In other words, you're worth only what you bring in. Many of you don't realize that being a lawyer is many times nothing more than a glorified sales job. Nobody cares if you went to Yale if you don't have any, or can't bring in any clients.
In other words, you're worth only what you bring in. Many of you don't realize that being a lawyer is many times nothing more than a glorified sales job. Nobody cares if you went to Yale if you don't have any, or can't bring in any clients.
- vamedic03
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
So, you take an article about Baker Botts, Orrick, and Reed Smith moving from lockstep compensation to a merit/performance based system and turn it into a 'chicken-little / the sky is falling' argument that law is a glorified sales job?MTal wrote:http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2011/ ... eed-raise/
In other words, you're worth only what you bring in. Many of you don't realize that being a lawyer is many times nothing more than a glorified sales job. Nobody cares if you went to Yale if you don't have any, or can't bring in any clients.
Look, it's nice if you want to post relevant articles but don't contort the premises to match your own prerogatives.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 6:13 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
- BruceWayne
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
In MTals's defense (and believe me I can't stand the guy) Wilmerhale started this a while back and Jones Day has always done it. It seems to be a trend. The lockstep model is something that no other business follows and many law firms seem to be deciding that it isn't working. That said lockstep is clearly better for associates, but in a sense it's not a very realistic model when the economy isn't booming. Considering that every other profession doesn't do lockstep, if law firms dropped it it wouldn't be the end of the world.
As far as the sales thing, I'm pretty sure most people already knew that. And really that only applies if you can make it to senior associate and then partner status. Any sort of non technical/math/science job is essentially a "sales" job. That's not especially enlightening information.
As far as the sales thing, I'm pretty sure most people already knew that. And really that only applies if you can make it to senior associate and then partner status. Any sort of non technical/math/science job is essentially a "sales" job. That's not especially enlightening information.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 6:13 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
So you can only make analogies, but not understand others.MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
This doesn't keep MBB consulting firms from providing good compensation. Lock step is not good for the best associates in the way that a union is not good for the best employees. The more that well regarded firms take the individualistic and less collectivist route, the better it will be for everyone.BruceWayne wrote:In MTals's defense (and believe me I can't stand the guy) Wilmerhale started this a while back and Jones Day has always done it. It seems to be a trend. The lockstep model is something that no other business follows and many law firms seem to be deciding that it isn't working. That said lockstep is clearly better for associates, but in a sense it's not a very realistic model when the economy isn't booming. Considering that every other profession doesn't do lockstep, if law firms dropped it it wouldn't be the end of the world.
As far as the sales thing, I'm pretty sure most people already knew that. And really that only applies if you can make it to senior associate and then partner status. Any sort of non technical/math/science job is essentially a "sales" job. That's not especially enlightening information.
- BruceWayne
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
I wasn't disagreeing/agreeing with the bolded. Providing or not providing good compensation isn't a problem intrinsic to merit based pay.bdubs wrote:This doesn't keep MBB consulting firms from providing good compensation. Lock step is not good for the best associates in the way that a union is not good for the best employees. The more that well regarded firms take the individualistic and less collectivist route, the better it will be for everyone.BruceWayne wrote:In MTals's defense (and believe me I can't stand the guy) Wilmerhale started this a while back and Jones Day has always done it. It seems to be a trend. The lockstep model is something that no other business follows and many law firms seem to be deciding that it isn't working. That said lockstep is clearly better for associates, but in a sense it's not a very realistic model when the economy isn't booming. Considering that every other profession doesn't do lockstep, if law firms dropped it it wouldn't be the end of the world.
As far as the sales thing, I'm pretty sure most people already knew that. And really that only applies if you can make it to senior associate and then partner status. Any sort of non technical/math/science job is essentially a "sales" job. That's not especially enlightening information.
I will say that there is a huge problem with your "best associate" comment though. "Best associate" is almost entirely subjective. A lot of that comes down to who likes who etc. And a lot of that is influeneced by race, sex, class etc. In a profession like law that is one of the most sexist, prejudice, and elitist in existence, that's a really bad thing for a lot of people.
- Adjudicator
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
lol, contradicting your own first post. Fail.MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
I had no idea it was impossible to sell a service...thanks for the enlightenment.Adjudicator wrote:lol, contradicting your own first post. Fail.MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
- Adjudicator
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
But apparently you can provide a service while also being nothing more than a glorified salesman?MTal wrote:I had no idea it was impossible to sell a service...thanks for the enlightenment.Adjudicator wrote:lol, contradicting your own first post. Fail.MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
Of course you can, but that's not what the vast majority of law is about. You have to bring in clients, otherwise you are worthless to a firm.Adjudicator wrote:But apparently you can provide a service while also being nothing more than a glorified salesman?MTal wrote: I had no idea it was impossible to sell a service...thanks for the enlightenment.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
So you get paid based on the quality of the service you provide?MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
No. Fucking. Way.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
How is this line from the article not the actual focus of debate here?Last year, the American Bar Association set up a commission to study the recession's impact on the legal profession. Its chair, Allan J. Tanenbaum, says that cost pressures on law firms pre-dated the economy's downturn. But the pressures came to the fore, he says, when the 2008 law school graduate class suffered from 80% unemployment.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
What you are saying is true of almost any profession. I would also quibble with the statement that law is one of the most prejudiced professions in existence given its bizarre fascination with racial and other quantifiable diversity to the point of a fault.BruceWayne wrote:I wasn't disagreeing/agreeing with the bolded. Providing or not providing good compensation isn't a problem intrinsic to merit based pay.
I will say that there is a huge problem with your "best associate" comment though. "Best associate" is almost entirely subjective. A lot of that comes down to who likes who etc. And a lot of that is influeneced by race, sex, class etc. In a profession like law that is one of the most sexist, prejudice, and elitist in existence, that's a really bad thing for a lot of people.
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
No, you get paid for BRINGING IN CLIENTS! Which only in part depends on the quality of your service.fatduck wrote:So you get paid based on the quality of the service you provide?MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
No. Fucking. Way.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
I'm legitimately wondering if you've ever been employed.MTal wrote:No, you get paid for BRINGING IN CLIENTS! Which only in part depends on the quality of your service.fatduck wrote:So you get paid based on the quality of the service you provide?MTal wrote:There is no product. Law is a...umm...service based profession?8ballistic wrote:If it's a glorified sales job, who makes the product?
No. Fucking. Way.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
Don't you actually get paid, for, you know, doing the work those clients are paying you to do?MTal wrote:No, you get paid for BRINGING IN CLIENTS! Which only in part depends on the quality of your service.
- Adjudicator
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
MTal wrote:No, you get paid for BRINGING IN CLIENTS! Which only in part depends on the quality of your service.

-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 6:13 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
So by MTal's definition any service profession without a guaranteed stream of clients is a glorified sales job.
Last edited by 8ballistic on Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Nogameisfair
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
Why do we still reply to this guy?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
MTal wrote:Many of you don't realize that being a lawyer is many times nothing more than a glorified sales job.
I've had a sales job. It's nothing like that.
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
Nogameisfair wrote:Why do we still reply to this guy?
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
Ideally that would be the case, but in the real world it isn't. You could be a brilliant aspy type lawyer and have all the relevant statutes and and rules memorized with the ability to recall them at a moments notice. Howevever, if you can't convince potential to clients to bring in business and then manage those relationships well once they do come in, all that knowledge you have isn't worth anything. Clients will choose to go with the dumber lawyer who is confident and outgoing than a brilliant aspy type lawyer who doesn't inspire confidence in himself with others.vanwinkle wrote:Don't you actually get paid, for, you know, doing the work those clients are paying you to do?MTal wrote:No, you get paid for BRINGING IN CLIENTS! Which only in part depends on the quality of your service.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:48 pm
Re: White shoe firms dumping lockstep raises
It is not even about value to a FIRM. Even the solo has to be in a position to sell themselves (not to be confused with whoring themselves out for a fee). Example: prospective client calls about a post-conviction matter. That initial contact is a big part of where we sell ourselves to them on why it makes sense for them to drop a large sum of money in our office as opposed to dropping only a few thousand somewhere else.MTal wrote:Of course you can, but that's not what the vast majority of law is about. You have to bring in clients, otherwise you are worthless to a firm.Adjudicator wrote:But apparently you can provide a service while also being nothing more than a glorified salesman?MTal wrote: I had no idea it was impossible to sell a service...thanks for the enlightenment.
A large part of daily business is going to be involved with the whole 'people person' component. Clients will tolerate a measure of snarkiness but they expect results and they DO expect their attorney(s) to have some semblance of a personality.
on edit...wow, did I actually just agree with the general tenor of an mtal post? damn I am getting soft in my old age...
Last edited by too old for this sh* on Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login