Is anyone else having trouble understanding the gist of a declaratory judgment?
I am currently understanding it to mean that unless a coercive suit would arise under fed law, a declaratory judgment can't invoke fed question jurisdiction.
Declaratory judgment? Forum
-
ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Declaratory judgment?
I don't really understand your question, but I assume you're asking about when jurisdiction is proper in federal court when plaintiff seeks only a declaratory judgment.
A party seeking a DJ can only invoke federal jurisdiction if the opposing party could have invoked federal jurisdiction.
As an example, a P seeking a DJ that he is not liable in contract because Federal Law X makes the contract unenforceable could NOT invoke jurisdiction. In this case, the D in the DJ action could not have sued in federal court (assuming no diversity).
But a P seeking a DJ that he is not liable for patent infringement could invoke jurisdiction. In such a case, the D in the DJ action could have brought his action in federal court.
A party seeking a DJ can only invoke federal jurisdiction if the opposing party could have invoked federal jurisdiction.
As an example, a P seeking a DJ that he is not liable in contract because Federal Law X makes the contract unenforceable could NOT invoke jurisdiction. In this case, the D in the DJ action could not have sued in federal court (assuming no diversity).
But a P seeking a DJ that he is not liable for patent infringement could invoke jurisdiction. In such a case, the D in the DJ action could have brought his action in federal court.
