How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:59 pm
How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
Obviously I imagine deferral programs varied between firms, but I'd love some info on how they generally worked. My understanding is that the firm would pay the deferred associate between 60-80k to work for a nonprofit, government entity, or client for a year? Is that correct?
Was this paid in one lump-some, or as a paycheck?
Did the firms match deferred associates to these positions, or did the deferred associates go out and find them?
Did the deferred associates get firm benefits (i.e. health insurance)?
I know some of these programs were "optional." What were the pros/cons of taking the deferral vs. starting?
Totally understand that how deferral programs would work this time around or even their existance is total speculation.
Was this paid in one lump-some, or as a paycheck?
Did the firms match deferred associates to these positions, or did the deferred associates go out and find them?
Did the deferred associates get firm benefits (i.e. health insurance)?
I know some of these programs were "optional." What were the pros/cons of taking the deferral vs. starting?
Totally understand that how deferral programs would work this time around or even their existance is total speculation.
- nealric
- Posts: 4389
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
It varied from firm to firm (both deferral, length, and payment terms). Some firms were optional, others mandatory. Length varied from 6 months to 18 months. Some firms also just rescinded offers. Some firms cut salaries during the downturn. And of course, some firms folded.
I ended up with 6 months unpaid (c/o 2010) at a v100.
I ended up with 6 months unpaid (c/o 2010) at a v100.
-
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 3:00 pm
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
Also interested in this. Would be particularly interested if any of the v20s did this and if associates (including midlevels) had the option to elect in to this.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:01 pm
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
Didn't Cravath do this in the great recession
- tuesdayninja
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:37 pm
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
Apparently WilmerHale had a decent year long deferment not tied to doing pro bono work. Latham apparently had a decent one too but I couldn't find specifics. https://abovethelaw.com/2009/04/nationw ... art-dates/
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
Talked to a partner today about an offer who said Cravath did this, as did Latham.
- TrynaLaw
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
See https://abovethelaw.com/deferral-stipend/ for a bunch of firm responses.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 5:37 am
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
https://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationw ... t-in-2010/
Mega list of treatment of 2009 incoming class. Changes were made later, but gist is that higher ranked firms treated people better--though I suspect that that's because they were richer, not because they were nicer. The distinction matters because richness and Vault are a lot less correlated now than then (e.g. Cahill, SRZ, etc.) so this time around may be different.
Mega list of treatment of 2009 incoming class. Changes were made later, but gist is that higher ranked firms treated people better--though I suspect that that's because they were richer, not because they were nicer. The distinction matters because richness and Vault are a lot less correlated now than then (e.g. Cahill, SRZ, etc.) so this time around may be different.
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
What happened to midlevels? Anyone asked to take time off or something?
- nealric
- Posts: 4389
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: How did firm deferment programs work during the Great Recession?
A few firms did paid sabbaticals, but it was mostly the exception.s1m4 wrote:What happened to midlevels? Anyone asked to take time off or something?