Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Hey everyone, I am trying to decide between Reed Smith, Chapman and Cutler, and mcguirewoods for my 2L SA position in Chicago. I am interested in doing corporate or corporate finance oriented transactional work. I can't decide between them, and was hoping to get people's insight into the firm, the work, and overall reputations of the firms. Also exit opps to larger firms and anything else that would be helping in making the decision. Thank you in advance for any help!
Also, Reed Smith doesn't pay market, but I've heard that their bonus structure kind of makes up for it. Anyone know anything about this?
Also, Reed Smith doesn't pay market, but I've heard that their bonus structure kind of makes up for it. Anyone know anything about this?
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Sep 11, 2014 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
mcguirewoods doesn't pay market either and no offered 2 SA's in their Chicago office this past summer. They really don't seem to be in good financial shape either tbh.
Chapman and Cutler is probably better specifically for corporate finance, but I've heard terrible things about the work environment from a couple of former associates.
Haven't heard anything bad about Reed Smith, and I was actually pretty impressed with them in my interview, I'd recommend them, but your gut feeling is probably going to be most important here since they're pretty comparable firms/offices
Chapman and Cutler is probably better specifically for corporate finance, but I've heard terrible things about the work environment from a couple of former associates.
Haven't heard anything bad about Reed Smith, and I was actually pretty impressed with them in my interview, I'd recommend them, but your gut feeling is probably going to be most important here since they're pretty comparable firms/offices
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Can you expand on mcguirewoods being in bad shape in Chicago and about bad experiences at Chapman. Everyone I spoke with about Chapman/at Chapman seemed to really emphasize the firm culture and the people and comparing their work to the same as a lot of large firms (which I read as good exit option possibility)Anonymous User wrote:McGuireWoods doesn't pay market either and no offered 2 SA's in their Chicago office this past summer. They really don't seem to be in good financial shape either tbh.
Chapman and Cutler is probably better specifically for corporate finance, but I've heard terrible things about the work environment from a couple of former associates.
Haven't heard anything bad about Reed Smith, and I was actually pretty impressed with them in my interview, I'd recommend them, but your gut feeling is probably going to be most important here since they're pretty comparable firms/offices
I am leaning towards Reed Smith as well, but paying 15 below market/Chapman has me debating between the two. Thank for you input btw!
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Anonymous User wrote:Can you expand on McGuireWoods being in bad shape in Chicago and about bad experiences at Chapman. Everyone I spoke with about Chapman/at Chapman seemed to really emphasize the firm culture and the people and comparing their work to the same as a lot of large firms (which I read as good exit option possibility)Anonymous User wrote:McGuireWoods doesn't pay market either and no offered 2 SA's in their Chicago office this past summer. They really don't seem to be in good financial shape either tbh.
Chapman and Cutler is probably better specifically for corporate finance, but I've heard terrible things about the work environment from a couple of former associates.
Haven't heard anything bad about Reed Smith, and I was actually pretty impressed with them in my interview, I'd recommend them, but your gut feeling is probably going to be most important here since they're pretty comparable firms/offices
I am leaning towards Reed Smith as well, but paying 15 below market/Chapman has me debating between the two. Thank for you input btw!
Without getting into specfics that would out me:
mcguirewoods: Have been told directly by a partner that their workflow outside of the Healthcare practice is "not great" and that there are issues within the firm caused by the fact that the Chicago office really reports to the firm's main office (in Richmond), and that there isn't smooth interaction. This is largely probably due to the fact that MW didn't grow organically into the Chicago market, but bought a Chicago firm already there. If you're really interested in Healthcare I'd still recommend MW, but I'd have concerns working there otherwise, esp since you have other options.
Chapman: I know (not through any interviewing process but personally) 2 associates who started at Chapman and left for other Chicago firms within 3 years. Overall, they found it to be a pretty cutthroat place, and are (at least from what they tell me) much happier at their new firms. Again, I've also been told Corp Finance is Chapman's "thing", so there is that to consider though.
You obviously need to just decide what firm you think is a better fit, but just thought I'd let you know what I know. Fwiw a $15K starting difference ($10K from MW) wouldn't be determinative for me given $145K is not bad at all in Chicago. If you're really going to factor money into the decision though, I'd try to find out what their bonus structure is like
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Thanks a lot for your reply, I really appreciate it. Good to know about mcguirewoods, they were my third anyways and this essentially confirms that.
15K/10K isn't a huge deal for me either, I had just heard that that Reed Smith had a better bonus structure so thought I'd ask the TLS-sphere.
Thank you again!
15K/10K isn't a huge deal for me either, I had just heard that that Reed Smith had a better bonus structure so thought I'd ask the TLS-sphere.
Thank you again!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
I have also heard from a few laterals that Chapman was not a place they enjoyed working at
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Chapman and Cutler is better for corporate and corporate finance and I've head from several people it
s pretty awesome to work there. That would be my pick.
s pretty awesome to work there. That would be my pick.
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
I've heard they have a strong practice in both as well. But do you get a wider variety with larger firms like Reed Smith? Also, looking at exit opps, do you have a better chance to lateral out having worked at a larger firm like Reed Smith vs. Chapman?Anonymous User wrote:Chapman and Cutler is better for corporate and corporate finance and I've head from several people it
s pretty awesome to work there. That would be my pick.
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Op here, also just got an offer from schiff Hardin. Any opinions/changes in prior thoughts? Sorry it's so open ended, I'm really lost about how to decide. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
OP, I have good info for you. How can I reach you?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:35 pm
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
This is OP. Feel free to PM me.Anonymous User wrote:OP, I have good info for you. How can I reach you?
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
Interested in this as well.Anonymous User wrote: Also, Reed Smith doesn't pay market, but I've heard that their bonus structure kind of makes up for it. Anyone know anything about this?
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:51 pm
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
-
Last edited by HotDogChow on Thu Apr 21, 2016 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Reed Smith or Chapman and Cutler or McGuireWoods (all Chi)
As in you are interested in it too or are you asking if I am interested and should contact you if I am?HotDogChow wrote:Interested in bonus structure?
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login