Help with law school recruiter problem Forum

daryldixon · Post by **daryldixon** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:21 pm

Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 3&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...

I don't believe you.

Mce252 · Post by **Mce252** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:24 pm

daryldixon wrote:
Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 3&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...
I don't believe you.

That's okay. A mod will take away the anonymity from my previous posts soon enough, I'd imagine. Or I could just edit the first post to say "THIS IS A TROLL." With that, see first post.

thesealocust · Post by **thesealocust** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:27 pm

Why on earth would you out yourself if it was completely made up? There are no tracks to bury if it's (a) totally false and (b) a post made by "anonymous user." The only conceivable motivation here... is COVERING UP THE REAL SCANDAL~

xRON MEXiCOx · Post by **xRON MEXiCOx** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:28 pm

LOL @ ATL for reporting on TLS flames. Way to go guys, keep up the great work.

Mce252 · Post by **Mce252** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:30 pm

thesealocust wrote:Why on earth would you out yourself if it was completely made up? There are no tracks to bury if it's (a) totally false and (b) a post made by "anonymous user." The only conceivable motivation here... is COVERING UP THE REAL SCANDAL~

I have no tracks to bury. If that had actually happened, in the firms I've worked for, everyone would probably already know by now anyway.

I mean, really, she shattered my windshield? How fast does that go around a law school and to associates at the firm? 4 hours?

mephistopheles · Post by **mephistopheles** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:38 pm

almost just convincing enough...

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:08 pm

Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 3&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...

Okay, you're banned.

TheUltimateTroll · Post by **TheUltimateTroll** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:20 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 3&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...
Okay, you're banned.

All I get is one week? How lenient of you. Is there a three strike policy on trolling? Here is another one from this summer that I enjoyed personally... http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=214027

helfer snooterbagon · Post by **helfer snooterbagon** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:38 pm

What is going on here? These were some quality trolls, I don't think anyone suspected!

daryldixon · Post by **daryldixon** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:32 pm

TheUltimateTroll wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=214027

Bro you are still amateur status. Anonymous trolls are not impressive.

daryldixon · Post by **daryldixon** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:33 pm

helfer snooterbagon wrote:What is going on here? These were some quality trolls, I don't think anyone suspected!

Is this the same dude?

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:48 pm

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:23 pm

helfer snooterbagon wrote:What is going on here? These were some quality trolls, I don't think anyone suspected!

I for one am shocked, SHOCKED to find that the referenced posts were untrue. But since the OP/Mce252 felt the need to create an alt to come back and tell us this, he can be banned for longer.

xRON MEXiCOx · Post by **xRON MEXiCOx** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:33 pm

but still LOL @ that shitrag ATL for writing an article on a clear flame.

hephaestus · Post by **hephaestus** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:35 pm

Ron Mexico wrote:but still LOL @ that shitrag ATL for writing an article on a clear flame.

Seriously. This one wasn't even that believable.

hichvichwoh · Post by **hichvichwoh** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:37 pm

Troll should get a medal for (further) discrediting ATL.

chup · Post by **chup** » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:57 am

Ron Mexico wrote:LOL @ ATL for reporting on TLS flames. Way to go guys, keep up the great work.

Journamalism!

Help with law school recruiter problem Forum

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Register for access!

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Register now!