Will you critique my answer to "why law"

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 310066
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Will you critique my answer to "why law"

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Aug 22, 2013 7:44 am

Inspired by the "Blowing CBs" thread, which I am very afraid of doing.

I get this question a lot, nearly every interview, maybe because I have a science background. I think I hurt myself in interviews answering this question because I originally was saying stuff along the lines of: "the focus was too narrow and I thought law would give me more exposure to other areas" (more embellished, but you get the general idea). I might also have said in a few interviews that I just lost interest in that type of work ("bored"). :oops:

Anyway, I went to our CSO and asked for some tips to improve my answer and they told me to answer more like "I wanted to work somewhere that would showcase more of my writing skills and since science and law are similar in application, my bg would be useful in a legal setting."

That sounded shallow and insincere to me, so I came up with this response: "It seems like jobs as scientific researchers plateau out pretty quickly, so I always kind of knew I wanted to do more than lab work my whole life, I just didn't know what. I was initially attracted to law, specifically patent work, because I knew it would be a good application for my background." And then I talk about how as I started to learn more about the law, more areas became interesting to me.

Any feedback before my next interviews would be great.


Posts: 1565
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Will you critique my answer to "why law"

Postby NYstate » Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:08 am

Don't sell yourself as a patent attorney unless you are interviewing for one. Maybe say something like while I gained [skills and experience] working in the lab, I realized that I didn't want to spend my career in the lab. I chose law because it plays to my strengths of analytical thinking, focus on detail and creative problem solving, all of which I used in the lab. [ have some examples ready but make sure they are brief.]

Throw in something about enjoying writing too if you want but maybe not necessary.

Say it better than that but focus on analysis, detail and problem solving. It is credible that you needed all these in the lab.

Don't mention being bored or your career plateau. Caree plateau sounds like you want to be in the lab but lack of options forced you out. You can say that you realized that lab work wasn't a great fit for the long term.

Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.