Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank. I know the rankings but any personal insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys!
Edit: Please comment if you vote, e.g., why you chose one over the other. Thanks again!
Edit: Please comment if you vote, e.g., why you chose one over the other. Thanks again!
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
I love you for adding a "doesn't make a difference" button. I don't know enough about HH to weigh in, but more people need to do this.
- monkey85
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:07 pm
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
Neither stand out in my mind. Both pay market salary. Go with the good ol "fit test."
Good luck and have fun this summer!
Good luck and have fun this summer!
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
Thanks to those who are commenting! For those who picked one firm over the other, is there any particular reason?
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
I only had experiences with one of the two firms, but I'd be curious to hear about OP's decision when s/he makes it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
My understanding is HH is superior in lit, but I might be wrong. They do much better in rankings for job satisfaction and other areas related to that as well, especially in AmLaw (read: diversity, women).
Also, the career center information on Above the Law paints a pretty sharp difference between the two. I would ignore the Vault rankings on this one. At least for me HH would be the clear choice. (Full disclosure I only did screeners with both firms that I have already been dinged at.)
HH: http://abovethelaw.com/law-firms/hughes ... -reed-llp/
FF: http://abovethelaw.com/law-firms/fried-frank/
Also, the career center information on Above the Law paints a pretty sharp difference between the two. I would ignore the Vault rankings on this one. At least for me HH would be the clear choice. (Full disclosure I only did screeners with both firms that I have already been dinged at.)
HH: http://abovethelaw.com/law-firms/hughes ... -reed-llp/
FF: http://abovethelaw.com/law-firms/fried-frank/
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
I voted for HH for exactly those reasons - it has an awesome reputation for associate satisfaction, diversity, and a lot of other QOL-related-variables. I worked at another firm with a similar profile (V50-V100, very high AmLaw scores, high QOL scores), loved it, and didn't see any of the unhappiness and misery that people usually report at big law firms. It's also a better litigation shop than FF, but I'd pick it even if it weren't.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
OP here, thank you all very much for the help.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- kwais
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
I think this one really comes down to what part of Manhattan you'd like to work in 

-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
One other thing to consider: FF is in good shape financially. Perhaps a better way to put it is that FF is very financially conservative. They might not have the best PPP, but they have been very careful to not over-hire so that they won't have to no-offer or do stealth layoffs. I have no idea whether that also applies to HHR.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
Anonymous User wrote:One other thing to consider: FF is in good shape financially. Perhaps a better way to put it is that FF is very financially conservative. They might not have the best PPP, but they have been very careful to not over-hire so that they won't have to no-offer or do stealth layoffs. I have no idea whether that also applies to HHR.
Thank you for the insight. I think the same can be said for HH. They tend to be very financially conservative from what I understand.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Hughes Hubbard v. Fried Frank
Almost picked HH myself, met multiple partners in Lit, they are lovely. They have a personality though, so definitely make sure you feel like you're a good fit there.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login