Sullivan vs. Simpson Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428560
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Sullivan vs. Simpson
No real practice area focus. Still feeling out whether want to do transactional or litigation. Any dispositive issues? Location is a differentiating factor. Simpson has great PE practice. Any huge negatives w/r/t culture? Impressions of both have been good. thanks in advance
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428560
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sullivan vs. Simpson
Simpson is polite, Sullivan is aggressive. Simpson does a lot of PE M&A, Sullivan does a lot of public company M&A. Sullivan is a bit less leveraged. Downtown is cheaper to live in than Midtown.Anonymous User wrote:No real practice area focus. Still feeling out whether want to do transactional or litigation. Any dispositive issues? Location is a differentiating factor. Simpson has great PE practice. Any huge negatives w/r/t culture? Impressions of both have been good. thanks in advance
