.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
shoeshine
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: New Feeder Judge Data
Thanks for this. Do you have any aspirations of doing a SCOTUS clerkship and are you working for any of the top feeder judges?
-
Grizz
- Posts: 10583
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: New Feeder Judge Data
agm82 wrote:ITT: Brian Leiter's TLS equivalent invests serious amounts of time compiling data relevant for 0.0001% of the law school population. Are you an actual federal law clerk today dude? I feel my tax dollars being wasted given that you seem to spend all day every day on this internet message board.
-
quiver
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: New Feeder Judge Data
Interesting stuff, GTL.
In the last chart when you refer to "active" judges, I assume this means "active" as in "still on the bench," not "active" as in "not senior status" right? I only ask because I'm pretty sure Calabresi and Sack (and maybe others on the list?) have taken senior status , so I just wanted to clarify.
In the last chart when you refer to "active" judges, I assume this means "active" as in "still on the bench," not "active" as in "not senior status" right? I only ask because I'm pretty sure Calabresi and Sack (and maybe others on the list?) have taken senior status , so I just wanted to clarify.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 298359
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: New Feeder Judge Data
Anyone still waiting? I had a few interviews at the end of last week, and I've yet to hear anything. I'm not expecting anything at this point (obviously I wasn't the top choice for any of those judges), but how long does it usually take for rejections? Is it possible that they've extended offers to people who are still sitting on them?
It just seems weird. All of my friends heard up or down within 48 hours (most within 24).
It just seems weird. All of my friends heard up or down within 48 hours (most within 24).
Who is online
The online users are hidden on this forum.