which firm best for patent litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
which firm best for patent litigation
got the last of my offers above recently. I accepted one, turned down everyone else.
interested in patent litigation (non life sciences)
whats best among these?
I've listed the office locations, I have no ties anywhere, I just want to go to the best damn firm there is for patent lit. I made my choice based in large part on how well I clicked with the group I met with, and on a ton of research of my own, and I used things like Chambers, Vault, looked at the partners ability to provide me with great work and keep me busy, read some literature I could get a hold of (tried to compare their clients with everybody else's clients, etc.), and finally asked my professors at my law school for advice.
This poll is just my curiosity re which firm TLS thinks is best for pat lit. Thanks a lot guys. If you can post comments on why you picked the firm you picked, anonymously or otherwise, I think that would be helpful for more people than just myself.
interested in patent litigation (non life sciences)
whats best among these?
I've listed the office locations, I have no ties anywhere, I just want to go to the best damn firm there is for patent lit. I made my choice based in large part on how well I clicked with the group I met with, and on a ton of research of my own, and I used things like Chambers, Vault, looked at the partners ability to provide me with great work and keep me busy, read some literature I could get a hold of (tried to compare their clients with everybody else's clients, etc.), and finally asked my professors at my law school for advice.
This poll is just my curiosity re which firm TLS thinks is best for pat lit. Thanks a lot guys. If you can post comments on why you picked the firm you picked, anonymously or otherwise, I think that would be helpful for more people than just myself.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:36 pm, edited 6 times in total.
- wiseowl
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:38 pm
Re: patent litigation offer poll
congratulations. (edited after vital information provided that wasn't there before)
Last edited by wiseowl on Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation offer poll
OP here, for clarification purposes, at no point in time did I ever have more than 5 offers outstanding - I turned offers down the moment a higher-ranked firm in my book gave me an offer, so the most number of offers I ever had outstanding was 2.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation offer poll
Oh, oops! I meant to vote for Irell. Can't undo -Sorry.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation offer poll
Irell Century City
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
It's hard to make a bad choice with a list like that, but you made the right choice with Irell.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
OP here: sorry if I gave the impression that I picked Irell, I just intended to state that Irell was a Century City offer, not the Newport Beach location.
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:53 pm
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
What industries feed the patent work in LA at Irell?
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
+1 my question exactlyspondee wrote:What industries feed the patent work in LA at Irell?
Lindsay Lohan isn't known for her inventive prowess.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
If you go through Irell's client list, none of them are "LA companies," so I doubt Irell relies on LA to provide it with high-tech companies. As it is, most of their high-end patent work is in the electronics field, they get their clients from all over the place.
There are maybe 20 pat lit stars out there in the country, and they bring in business for their respective firms. So you got people like Bill Lee, Donald Dunner, John Desmarais, Morgan Chu, Matt Powers, etc. etc. etc.
Some of these guys, like Morgan Chu and Matt Powers, are probably in a league of their own, so they get a lot of attention for bet-the-company type litigation. Is a firm great because one guy's in it? That doesn't make much sense. Better approach is depth of bench. But then again, I'm pretty sure if any one of these guys LEAVES their firm for another firm, a bunch of stars leave with them. While it makes sense to evaluate patent "groups" - its really individual lawyers who are the nucleus of that group.
There are maybe 20 pat lit stars out there in the country, and they bring in business for their respective firms. So you got people like Bill Lee, Donald Dunner, John Desmarais, Morgan Chu, Matt Powers, etc. etc. etc.
Some of these guys, like Morgan Chu and Matt Powers, are probably in a league of their own, so they get a lot of attention for bet-the-company type litigation. Is a firm great because one guy's in it? That doesn't make much sense. Better approach is depth of bench. But then again, I'm pretty sure if any one of these guys LEAVES their firm for another firm, a bunch of stars leave with them. While it makes sense to evaluate patent "groups" - its really individual lawyers who are the nucleus of that group.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
can the people casting these votes kindly throw in a comment as to why you're making your choices?
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
.
Last edited by NYAssociate on Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
covington's more overrated
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
is the above poll results bec irell is most selectiev from those firms, or that they get better clients? Why is Weil coming in so low?
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
/thread, looks like one firm seems to have a lot of fans on here.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
Bill Lee hates this thread
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: which firm best for patent litigation
once upon a time, Fish would've dominated this poll, sigh.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login