Leak your school's OCI data here Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Leak your school's OCI data here
If your school has OCI-2009 data please leak it in this thread. Students from Columbia and NYU already have. What about other top schools.
Columbia data sorted and provided by Unemployed
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
NYU
70%
Columbia data sorted and provided by Unemployed
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
NYU
70%
Last edited by 09042014 on Wed May 19, 2010 2:40 pm, edited 6 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
would have anticipated more leakage by now, DF.
(too early to call this thread a dud?)
(too early to call this thread a dud?)
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Give it a little while. Maybe some schools don't fill students in until after finals?
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:46 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Maybe OP should put the NYU and Columbia data at the top of the thread if he wouldn't mind.
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
acdisagod wrote:Maybe OP should put the NYU and Columbia data at the top of the thread if he wouldn't mind.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:46 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Well here is Columbia
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 77 (19.25%)
For comparison, 2006 stats:
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~390 (97.5%)
V10 Placement: 134 (33.5%)
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 77 (19.25%)
For comparison, 2006 stats:
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~390 (97.5%)
V10 Placement: 134 (33.5%)
-
- Posts: 428567
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
It's interesting that 60+% got V100, and only 6% got "other" Biglaw jobs. To me that suggests that, had the bottom 3rd aimed a little lower, it might have been better rewarded. Seems like something that will correct itself when next year's data come sout. Still, have the class in V50 jobs ITE is pretty impressive.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
It's actually a bloodbath. This isn't 67% of the class in biglaw jobs, it's 67% of the EIW participants. This means that anyone who knew they didn't want biglaw, because they wanted PI, gov't, etc., isn't counted. In the past, well over 90% of EIW participants got offers, and many got multiple offers.lawschoollll wrote:It's interesting that 60+% got V100, and only 6% got "other" Biglaw jobs. To me that suggests that, had the bottom 3rd aimed a little lower, it might have been better rewarded. Seems like something that will correct itself when next year's data come sout. Still, have the class in V50 jobs ITE is pretty impressive.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
quick clarifying question: what is the relevance of V10 vs V25 vs V50, etc. Reading ATL, I gather that the V10s may have been a more secure place to be this past year but beyond that -- somewhat nebulous differences in job security -- who cares if it's V10 or V100?
- underdawg
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
your future employers will caremiamiman wrote:quick clarifying question: what is the relevance of V10 vs V25 vs V50, etc. Reading ATL, I gather that the V10s may have been a more secure place to be this past year but beyond that -- somewhat nebulous differences in job security -- who cares if it's V10 or V100?
and actually i think there's been a huge difference in job security at V10 than V100
Last edited by underdawg on Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rand M.
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
It's not really about job security. It is more about a combination of prestige and exit opportunities. V5 firms offer different opportunities; having such a name on your resume can get you into doors down the road that other firms just cannot.miamiman wrote:quick clarifying question: what is the relevance of V10 vs V25 vs V50, etc. Reading ATL, I gather that the V10s may have been a more secure place to be this past year but beyond that -- somewhat nebulous differences in job security -- who cares if it's V10 or V100?
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
ohic. thanx much.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Right, I understand the numbers. That's why I qualified with "ITE." And, anecdotally, 2009 OCI (C/O 2011) was the worst year, right?Renzo wrote:It's actually a bloodbath. This isn't 67% of the class in biglaw jobs, it's 67% of the EIW participants. This means that anyone who knew they didn't want biglaw, because they wanted PI, gov't, etc., isn't counted. In the past, well over 90% of EIW participants got offers, and many got multiple offers.lawschoollll wrote:It's interesting that 60+% got V100, and only 6% got "other" Biglaw jobs. To me that suggests that, had the bottom 3rd aimed a little lower, it might have been better rewarded. Seems like something that will correct itself when next year's data come sout. Still, have the class in V50 jobs ITE is pretty impressive.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
- underdawg
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
yeah 09 was the worst....so far...
Last edited by underdawg on Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
And probably will be, at least in terms of uncertainty. It's unlikely that we'll see a rebound in hiring, but it's also unlikely that the same kind of infinite deferrals, 50% summer offer rates, rescinded offers, etc. will be repeated.underdawg wrote:yeah 09 was the worst....so far...
- Unemployed
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Hey now - at least credit the original author/compiler of that data. Because I spent time looking up V designations and counting up offers instead of studying, my chance at all the V's got downgraded.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Ok.Unemployed wrote:Hey now - at least credit the original author/compiler of that data. Because I spent time looking up V designations and counting up offers instead of studying, my chance at all the V's got downgraded.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
True. Thanks, and props for wasting your timeUnemployed wrote:Hey now - at least credit the original author/compiler of that data. Because I spent time looking up V designations and counting up offers instead of studying, my chance at all the V's got downgraded.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
- DerrickRose
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:08 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
Disagree. What it looks like to me from the limited data we have is that the firms are essentially approximating the students admissions numbers based on their school and class ranking and adjusting their hiring up and down accordingly.bwv812 wrote:These results are much better than what I expected, especially since there was some speculation that firms would take the better students from all schools, and more or less ignore mediocre students from all schools. Instead, it seems like school prestige meant even more in 2009.
It makes a hell of a lot of sense. Biglaw admissions are basically law school admissions, just with more specified, standardized data.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
As always, it's relative, and it was exponentially worse at lower-regarded schools. But 30%+ less students with jobs is huge, no matter if it takes you from 90-60% or 60-30%.bwv812 wrote:A bloodbath? Then what are you calling what happened below T6? These results are much better than what I expected, especially since there was some speculation that firms would take the better students from all schools, and more or less ignore mediocre students from all schools. Instead, it seems like school prestige meant even more in 2009.Renzo wrote:It's actually a bloodbath. This isn't 67% of the class in biglaw jobs, it's 67% of the EIW participants. This means that anyone who knew they didn't want biglaw, because they wanted PI, gov't, etc., isn't counted. In the past, well over 90% of EIW participants got offers, and many got multiple offers.lawschoollll wrote:It's interesting that 60+% got V100, and only 6% got "other" Biglaw jobs. To me that suggests that, had the bottom 3rd aimed a little lower, it might have been better rewarded. Seems like something that will correct itself when next year's data come sout. Still, have the class in V50 jobs ITE is pretty impressive.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
ugh. this thread depresses me. I blame Renzo -- not because of anything he said but rather for his pull-no-punches, balls-and-strikes rhetorical style. Every time I think there's hope, Renzo is there to shatter it.Renzo wrote:It's actually a bloodbath. This isn't 67% of the class in biglaw jobs, it's 67% of the EIW participants. This means that anyone who knew they didn't want biglaw, because they wanted PI, gov't, etc., isn't counted. In the past, well over 90% of EIW participants got offers, and many got multiple offers.lawschoollll wrote:It's interesting that 60+% got V100, and only 6% got "other" Biglaw jobs. To me that suggests that, had the bottom 3rd aimed a little lower, it might have been better rewarded. Seems like something that will correct itself when next year's data come sout. Still, have the class in V50 jobs ITE is pretty impressive.Anonymous User wrote:Columbia
V10 Placement: 19.25%
V25 Placement: 34%
V50 Placement: 49.75%
V75 Placement: 56.5%
V100 Placement: 61.25%
Total EIP Placement (according to OP): 67.5%
I still like you though Renzo.
- kaydish21
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:51 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
This makes me even more curious to see additional school's data. Is there a way to see when schools release the data, or can more current students provide this information?
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Leak your schools OCI data here
That's why I started the thread, to get students to leak their schools data.kaydish21 wrote:This makes me even more curious to see additional school's data. Is there a way to see when schools release the data, or can more current students provide this information?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login