Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:26 am
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
What is the deal with this guy's schtick? Is there some "Covington LA" inside joke that I'm unaware of? It kinda reminds me of the playful Schulte trolling a couple years back.gchatbrah wrote:Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
- First Offense
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
How big could that office possibly be? They're not in the Munger/W&C discussion at all.rpupkin wrote:What is the deal with this guy's schtick? Is there some "Covington LA" inside joke that I'm unaware of? It kinda reminds me of the playful Schulte trolling a couple years back.gchatbrah wrote:Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
It's like someone started a thread about Harvard vs. Stanford and then someone chimes in about adding USC to the mix. That's why I was wondering about the origins of this Convington-LA schtick, which I've seen this poster adopt in other threads.First Offense wrote:How big could that office possibly be? They're not in the Munger/W&C discussion at all.rpupkin wrote:What is the deal with this guy's schtick? Is there some "Covington LA" inside joke that I'm unaware of? It kinda reminds me of the playful Schulte trolling a couple years back.gchatbrah wrote:Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
S/he's been trolling about this for a while, and has been warned, so they're getting a short break.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:35 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
This board supports clearly supports fake news.A. Nony Mouse wrote:S/he's been trolling about this for a while, and has been warned, so they're getting a short break.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:35 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
Just pulled two associates from MTO, so they know who their peers are.First Offense wrote:How big could that office possibly be? They're not in the Munger/W&C discussion at all.rpupkin wrote:What is the deal with this guy's schtick? Is there some "Covington LA" inside joke that I'm unaware of? It kinda reminds me of the playful Schulte trolling a couple years back.gchatbrah wrote:Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
And this poster clearly supports alting! Goodbye.wjs98 wrote:This board supports clearly supports fake news.A. Nony Mouse wrote:S/he's been trolling about this for a while, and has been warned, so they're getting a short break.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:05 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
LA-based SA here. Can confirm the market perception of Covington LA and, to a lesser extent, Akin CC as rising powers. Both firms have paid out above-market recruitment bonuses, and they are aggressively looking to grow.gchatbrah wrote:Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
This is hilarious. Hey everybody: the fact that a firm wants to grow doesn't mean that it's a desirable or prestigious place to work. And the fact that a couple of associates lateraled from one firm to another doesn't mean that those two firms are "peers." If anything, it suggests the opposite, as folks usually lateral down.
-
- Posts: 432616
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
I'm also LA-based and I can confirm that no one in this city considers either Covington or Akin to be nearly on par with Munger or W&C, especially for young associates. So I'm not sure why they're being brought up ITT.Julien_Benda wrote:LA-based SA here. Can confirm the market perception of Covington LA and, to a lesser extent, Akin CC as rising powers. Both firms have paid out above-market recruitment bonuses, and they are aggressively looking to grow.gchatbrah wrote:Would consider adding Covington LA to the mix -- pretty aggressive lateral activity recently. Firm is definitely committed to growing that office.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:40 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
Lateraling up for sure. Not to mention the lovely Century City views. Have heard great things from other users in this community.rpupkin wrote:This is hilarious. Hey everybody: the fact that a firm wants to grow doesn't mean that it's a desirable or prestigious place to work. And the fact that a couple of associates lateraled from one firm to another doesn't mean that those two firms are "peers." If anything, it suggests the opposite, as folks usually lateral down.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
Well, I've got to give the Covington recruiters points for persistence.BurlingTON wrote:Lateraling up for sure. Not to mention the lovely Century City views. Have heard great things from other users in this community.rpupkin wrote:This is hilarious. Hey everybody: the fact that a firm wants to grow doesn't mean that it's a desirable or prestigious place to work. And the fact that a couple of associates lateraled from one firm to another doesn't mean that those two firms are "peers." If anything, it suggests the opposite, as folks usually lateral down.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
And not even trying to hide their alts!rpupkin wrote:Well, I've got to give the Covington recruiters points for persistence.
- First Offense
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: Munger vs Williams & Connolly for General Lit
It'd be one thing if they mentioned Covington DC. But LA?rpupkin wrote:This is hilarious. Hey everybody: the fact that a firm wants to grow doesn't mean that it's a desirable or prestigious place to work. And the fact that a couple of associates lateraled from one firm to another doesn't mean that those two firms are "peers." If anything, it suggests the opposite, as folks usually lateral down.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login