USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans? Forum
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:56 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
thanks for the advice everyone. I had a feeling job prospects were bleak for USF....guess I was just hoping someone could prove me wrong. I am also considering going to Santa Clara but I'd be paying sticker there too. On the waitlist to Hastings & Loyola and will definitely attend if admitted. This cycle has been rough. (I plan on working in the bay area after law school).
- A'nold
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:07 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I kind of like USF, TBH, but their main problem IMO is that they don't give out enough money. Back in the day I think they were more respected than McGeorge and Santa Clara and have been sliding for a few years now and they could have probably prevented this if they would have tried to lure higher numbered students to the school via large scholarships. At least they have a pretty campus in a killer location, if you are looking for a plus. Although, with that comes insane COL. 

-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:49 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
similar situation here ...I have a modest size scholly to this school. I have a decent/small scholarship to Santa Clara but dont think I am doing this either...The price is just too high for Santa Clara and the Job prospects area just bleak for USF...Think I'm officially putting myself in the June LSAT for a retake
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
--LinkRemoved--jr0008 wrote:I am considering attending USF but will need to take out at least $120,000 in loans. Is the debt worth it considering USF's ranking? I'm worried about the employment/salary prospects after graduating. Appreciate any comments on this.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Wouldn't that only be around 400,000 after taxes not even accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments and 3 years of lost salary?swheat wrote:I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
No...this accounts for 30% taxes. And I didn't even factor in a tax break for the loan payments.Kohinoor wrote:Wouldn't that only be around 400,000 after taxes not even accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments and 3 years of lost salary?swheat wrote:I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
Lost salary @ 45k per year would take total down to about 800k (down from 930k).
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Show your math please. I just did 14k a year *30 which gave me 420,000 dollars which doesn't include the aforementioned costs. I'm not sure how you got triple that.swheat wrote:No...this accounts for 30% taxes. And I didn't even factor in a tax break for the loan payments.Kohinoor wrote:Wouldn't that only be around 400,000 after taxes not even accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments and 3 years of lost salary?swheat wrote:I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
Lost salary @ 45k per year would take total down to about 800k (down from 930k).
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:13 am
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
2 scenarios: 1st, the person does not go to law school. Earns 45k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $1,766,675.53.Kohinoor wrote:Show your math please. I just did 14k a year *30 which gave me 420,000 dollars which doesn't include the aforementioned costs. I'm not sure how you got triple that.swheat wrote:No...this accounts for 30% taxes. And I didn't even factor in a tax break for the loan payments.Kohinoor wrote:Wouldn't that only be around 400,000 after taxes not even accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments and 3 years of lost salary?swheat wrote:I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
Lost salary @ 45k per year would take total down to about 800k (down from 930k).
2nd scenario: person goes to law school, incurs 150k in debt. Earns 65k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $2,994,610.72. Now we need to subtract the 45k over 3 years (-135k) as well as the -352k in loan repayments (borrowed 150k @ 7% interest). After subtracting these, the 30 year total is $2,507,572.92.
The difference between the 2 scenarios is $740,896.92.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:56 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
swheat wrote:I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
Thanks swheat. I'm trying to remain as realistic as possible about attending USF, taking out a minimum of $120,000 in loans, and maintaining a decent QOL afterwards. I'm assuming, correct me if I'm wrong, with USF's reputation and with decent grades I can count on landing a job with a small or midsize firm @ 90-110k? Just seems like I'd need to be making that much to make the payments on my loans.
- spinsta
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:16 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
No. To me, 120k in loans is only worth it for T14. If you don't go T14, go to the best school where you get a really big scholly (full tuition would be best).
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I think 90-110k might be a little bit overstated. If you are top of your class, definitely. But I think a more likely scenario is 70-85k for a middle of the pack grad. Which is still great. And as my analysis shows, anything over 65k is worth your while from a pure financial standpoint.jr0008 wrote:swheat wrote:I am going to disagree with everyone else that posted here. The conventional wisdom on TLS is "no 100k+ for anything outside T1." There's some merit to that argument, but it usually centers around biglaw prospects. Which is fine. Biglaw is good and everything if you can get it. But it really ignores the long-term financial benefit that even a 20k salary increase can provide. I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k.
Raising your salary by 20k increases your 30 year earnings by almost a million dollars, even after accounting for the ~300-350k worth of loan payments.
Thanks swheat. I'm trying to remain as realistic as possible about attending USF, taking out a minimum of $120,000 in loans, and maintaining a decent QOL afterwards. I'm assuming, correct me if I'm wrong, with USF's reputation and with decent grades I can count on landing a job with a small or midsize firm @ 90-110k? Just seems like I'd need to be making that much to make the payments on my loans.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:13 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
That's good, since there isn't one.* Is your $1 million figure (or $930k ... or $800k, or whatever it is) nominal value or net present value?swheat wrote:No...this accounts for 30% taxes. And I didn't even factor in a tax break for the loan payments.
(*) Student loan interest deduction doesn't count -- deduction is limited to $2,500 and income capped at $70k. This will cut at most $625 from your total tax bill, if you even qualify to take it.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Check my math above. I didn't factor in any tax breaks, which is good considering they don't really exist.snotrocket wrote:That's good, since there isn't one.* Is your $1 million figure (or $930k ... or $800k, or whatever it is) nominal value or net present value?swheat wrote:No...this accounts for 30% taxes. And I didn't even factor in a tax break for the loan payments.
(*) Student loan interest deduction doesn't count -- deduction is limited to $2,500 and income capped at $70k. This will cut at most $625 from your total tax bill, if you even qualify to take it.
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Most of that profit comes from an unrealistic assumption of yearly 4% raises for 30 years which makes the salary that started higher get exponentially better over time.swheat wrote:2 scenarios: 1st, the person does not go to law school. Earns 45k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $1,766,675.53.Kohinoor wrote:Show your math please. I just did 14k a year *30 which gave me 420,000 dollars which doesn't include the aforementioned costs. I'm not sure how you got triple that.
2nd scenario: person goes to law school, incurs 150k in debt. Earns 65k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $2,994,610.72. Now we need to subtract the 45k over 3 years (-135k) as well as the -352k in loan repayments (borrowed 150k @ 7% interest). After subtracting these, the 30 year total is $2,507,572.92.
The difference between the 2 scenarios is $740,896.92.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
$80,000 in San Francisco isn't a lot of money. $80k in San Francisco is equal, in cost of living, to around $40,000 in a city like Philadelphia (which has a pretty average COL).swheat wrote: I think 90-110k might be a little bit overstated. If you are top of your class, definitely. But I think a more likely scenario is 70-85k for a middle of the pack grad. Which is still great. And as my analysis shows, anything over 65k is worth your while from a pure financial standpoint.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- hypermeganet
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:34 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Difference = 30.769%, even with raises (as the raises are identical). Your math is incorrect, as you show the difference to be 41.0%. Double check your math.swheat wrote:
2 scenarios: 1st, the person does not go to law school. Earns 45k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $1,766,675.53.
2nd scenario: person goes to law school, incurs 150k in debt. Earns 65k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $2,994,610.72. Now we need to subtract the 45k over 3 years (-135k) as well as the -352k in loan repayments (borrowed 150k @ 7% interest). After subtracting these, the 30 year total is $2,507,572.92.
The difference between the 2 scenarios is $740,896.92.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Salary.com claims that raises average 4.1% per year. This article mentions a 3% raise as being low due to the bad economy:Kohinoor wrote:Most of that profit comes from an unrealistic assumption of yearly 4% raises for 30 years which makes the salary that started higher get exponentially better over time.swheat wrote:2 scenarios: 1st, the person does not go to law school. Earns 45k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $1,766,675.53.Kohinoor wrote:Show your math please. I just did 14k a year *30 which gave me 420,000 dollars which doesn't include the aforementioned costs. I'm not sure how you got triple that.
2nd scenario: person goes to law school, incurs 150k in debt. Earns 65k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $2,994,610.72. Now we need to subtract the 45k over 3 years (-135k) as well as the -352k in loan repayments (borrowed 150k @ 7% interest). After subtracting these, the 30 year total is $2,507,572.92.
The difference between the 2 scenarios is $740,896.92.
http://www.salary.com/personal/layoutsc ... art=par171
-
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:05 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Well, one of the benefits of moving to a higher salary range is to increase the base on which you add COL raises. Also, while you can argue that a typical 4% COL raise might be unrealistic in a recession, to be fair the recession would also batter the hypothetical person at the lower salary.Kohinoor wrote:Most of that profit comes from an unrealistic assumption of yearly 4% raises for 30 years which makes the salary that started higher get exponentially better over time.
I'm not arguing in favor of going to USF - I'm not convinced it would guarantee a $20K/year higher salary or a secure job - but if you went to a school that gave you a shot at that, then the calculations are fine.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Show your calculations please.hypermeganet wrote:Difference = 30.769%, even with raises (as the raises are identical). Your math is incorrect, as you show the difference to be 41.0%. Double check your math.swheat wrote:
2 scenarios: 1st, the person does not go to law school. Earns 45k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $1,766,675.53.
2nd scenario: person goes to law school, incurs 150k in debt. Earns 65k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $2,994,610.72. Now we need to subtract the 45k over 3 years (-135k) as well as the -352k in loan repayments (borrowed 150k @ 7% interest). After subtracting these, the 30 year total is $2,507,572.92.
The difference between the 2 scenarios is $740,896.92.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:05 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
That's pretty ridiculous.Helmholtz wrote:$80,000 in San Francisco isn't a lot of money. $80k in San Francisco is equal, in cost of living, to around $40,000 in a city like Philadelphia (which has a pretty average COL).swheat wrote: I think 90-110k might be a little bit overstated. If you are top of your class, definitely. But I think a more likely scenario is 70-85k for a middle of the pack grad. Which is still great. And as my analysis shows, anything over 65k is worth your while from a pure financial standpoint.
But, even a more reasonable statement would still be limited. People make way too much out of COL differences between cities. What happens is that you make different choices about how you spend your money in San Francisco as opposed to Philadelphia. What really matters is the overall quality of life.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Exactly...my SO and I are living comfortably in the East Bay on 75k combined salary. Nice apartment, nice things, nice clean city. I don't get to save as much as I would like but I am able to put away $500 or so per month. Could we afford to live comfortably in SF on this salary? No...but if our combined income was, say 120k I believe we could do alright in SF even with ~700-900 in student loan payments per month.sbalive wrote:That's pretty ridiculous.Helmholtz wrote:$80,000 in San Francisco isn't a lot of money. $80k in San Francisco is equal, in cost of living, to around $40,000 in a city like Philadelphia (which has a pretty average COL).swheat wrote: I think 90-110k might be a little bit overstated. If you are top of your class, definitely. But I think a more likely scenario is 70-85k for a middle of the pack grad. Which is still great. And as my analysis shows, anything over 65k is worth your while from a pure financial standpoint.
But, even a more reasonable statement would still be limited. People make way too much out of COL differences between cities. What happens is that you make different choices about how you spend your money in San Francisco as opposed to Philadelphia. What really matters is the overall quality of life.
- hypermeganet
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:34 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I didn't do any, but I tossed these figures into excel and your first number is correct, the sum of all future cash flows of 45k, taxed at 30% for 30 years is 1,766,676. The sum of future cash flows of 65k is 2,551,865 not 2,994,610. That's your error.swheat wrote:Show your calculations please.hypermeganet wrote:Difference = 30.769%, even with raises (as the raises are identical). Your math is incorrect, as you show the difference to be 41.0%. Double check your math.swheat wrote:
2 scenarios: 1st, the person does not go to law school. Earns 45k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $1,766,675.53.
2nd scenario: person goes to law school, incurs 150k in debt. Earns 65k per year, taxed at 30%, increasing at 4% per year. The 30 year total in this scenario is $2,994,610.72. Now we need to subtract the 45k over 3 years (-135k) as well as the -352k in loan repayments (borrowed 150k @ 7% interest). After subtracting these, the 30 year total is $2,507,572.92.
The difference between the 2 scenarios is $740,896.92.
So, you have 2551865-359266-1766676 = $425923 total difference. Account for lost wages: 425923-98330 = $327,593. This is the total amount earned in excess by going to law school. Nearly 10k a year more. Not bad.
Last edited by hypermeganet on Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
The initial premise of swheat was "I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k." Now we've narrowed it down to "I've crunched the numbers and borrowing up to 150k to go to law school is a good investment if you are confident that you will raise your yearly salary by at least 20k and find a job in an industry with a compensation structure where annual raises of roughly 4% are the norm". Now, biglaw doesn't work that way period and I'm not sure which jobs that require a JD do work that way.sbalive wrote:Well, one of the benefits of moving to a higher salary range is to increase the base on which you add COL raises. Also, while you can argue that a typical 4% COL raise might be unrealistic in a recession, to be fair the recession would also batter the hypothetical person at the lower salary.Kohinoor wrote:Most of that profit comes from an unrealistic assumption of yearly 4% raises for 30 years which makes the salary that started higher get exponentially better over time.
I'm not arguing in favor of going to USF - I'm not convinced it would guarantee a $20K/year higher salary or a secure job - but if you went to a school that gave you a shot at that, then the calculations are fine.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login