Of course they say they consider these factors. They just don't say how much weight they give to them (which is not enough to matter compared to GPA/LSAT). Schools also usually say that they consider all LSAT scores, but the data from LSN shows that they don't give any weight to any but the highest.DiniMae wrote:This is taken straight out of a T10 application for 2015:
In evaluating your undergraduate GPA, the following factors may be considered: the age of the grades, exceptionally high grades, difficulty of coursework, time commitments while attending college, dependent care during school, grading patterns at the school attended, and grade trends or discrepancies among your grades.
Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes Forum
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
Just want to point out that just because a class is an intro class doesn't make it an easy one. Some intro classes are weed-out classes, or are just tough because of the breadth of topics covered.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
I go to UAlbany and can attest that this is true, they do refer to Albany Law as "Harvard on the Hudson" .... haha!
Dirigo wrote:As a URM, I don't think there's really much difference between a 3.6x and a 3.7. You'll be pretty desirable with a high LSAT score, regardless of .1 difference in GPA. Spend time and energy on your LSAT. (Maybe a December or a February take would be possible without BS classes to worry about?)
Looking at the T14, a 3.7 would still leave you between 25% and median for most schools...the exact same place you would be with a 3.6. An extra year of classes seems more trouble than it's worth for someone in your situation.
And prelaw advisors generally suck and/or have boomer era idealizations of all law schools as leading to prosperity. At my undergrad, Albany law is "HARVARD ON THE HUDSON [River]"
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
hur dur so does CooleyDiniMae wrote:This is taken straight out of a T10 application for 2015:
In evaluating your undergraduate GPA, the following factors may be considered: the age of the grades, exceptionally high grades, difficulty of coursework, time commitments while attending college, dependent care during school, grading patterns at the school attended, and grade trends or discrepancies among your grades.
- Skool
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
This whole idea is despicable.
OP needs to graduate and spend the next year getting a life. That this is even under serious consideration is a reflection on OPs crappy judgment, lack of intellectual curiosity, and what appears to be an inability to understand the value of a dollar.
Just get a job, any job, study for the lsat, run, fuck people, read James Joyce, make a new friend, go on a road trip, try new drugs, call your grandma. Live a life and stop being silly.
I suspect that this is the subtext of what your adviser was trying to say to you.
And while you're at it, get off my fucking lawn.
OP needs to graduate and spend the next year getting a life. That this is even under serious consideration is a reflection on OPs crappy judgment, lack of intellectual curiosity, and what appears to be an inability to understand the value of a dollar.
Just get a job, any job, study for the lsat, run, fuck people, read James Joyce, make a new friend, go on a road trip, try new drugs, call your grandma. Live a life and stop being silly.
I suspect that this is the subtext of what your adviser was trying to say to you.
And while you're at it, get off my fucking lawn.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
Be moar intellectually curious...Skool wrote:This whole idea is despicable.
OP needs to graduate and spend the next year getting a life. That this is even under serious consideration is a reflection on OPs crappy judgment, lack of intellectual curiosity, and what appears to be an inability to understand the value of a dollar.
Just get a job, any job, study for the lsat, run, fuck people, read James Joyce, make a new friend, go on a road trip, try new drugs, call your grandma. Live a life and stop being silly.
I suspect that this is the subtext of what your adviser was trying to say to you.
And while you're at it, get off my fucking lawn.
Alternately: whoosh
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:19 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
Take all easy classes. GPA LSAT + a little softs is all that matters
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:22 am
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
This is exactly what I was going to say. Just graduate and make some money while studying for the LSAT. I don't claim to know much about the sorcery involved with the hair-splitting of academic credentials at HYS, etc., but I would think an extra point or two on the LSAT would help you MUCH more than 0.1 GPA point.hillz wrote:IMO, I think it would be better for you to spend the next year: 1) focusing on the LSAT and making an excellent score 2) getting some work experience. You can still do something meaningful for the causes you care about, whether it's actually working full time for a non-profit or working somewhere else and being involved in your community outside of work. When it comes time for you to apply for jobs after law school, interviewers will look more favorably on someone who has job experience. Not to mention that it will also benefit you in that it might clarify what exactly you want to do with your law degree.
And that's just in the narrow situation of getting into law school. Long term, there is much more benefit to gaining work/life experience and earning some money than taking a year of blow off classes.
Dean Perez
Texas Tech Law
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:01 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
pancakes3 wrote:Just want to point out that just because a class is an intro class doesn't make it an easy one. Some intro classes are weed-out classes, or are just tough because of the breadth of topics covered.
That's true for pre-med for sure.
- PepperJack
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
Being challenged will make you a better scholar, but you can do this in ways that don't threaten your GPA (eg: a library card).
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
Yeah, the advice given to OP is really dumb. Law schools care about two numbers: GPA and LSAT. Raising your GPA from 3.6 to 3.7 could put you above a lot of top schools' GPA median (that's right where a lot of medians are). As a URM, this could mean hundreds of thousands of dollars of scholarship money.TheSpanishMain wrote:Pre-law advisors are generally dumb.
All but a few schools will actually care how your GPA got that way...the only thing that matters to them is what median they have to report to LSAC/US News.
- Skool
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
I mean, what's the value added by being in a university/class room at all then? Presumably reading difficult shit with people who are on their game and who hold you accountable for your thoughts pushes people further.PepperJack wrote:Being challenged will make you a better scholar, but you can do this in ways that don't threaten your GPA (eg: a library card).
You take all the risk, but you get the reward too.
Last edited by Skool on Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:13 am
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
That's cool, but they actually don't give a shit. An A in remedial basket weaving is better than a B in advanced physics. They want good stats more than hard coursework. The best course of action is to have the chill 5th year, kill the grades of whatever he wants to take, and use his extra time studying for the LSAT.DiniMae wrote:This is taken straight out of a T10 application for 2015:
In evaluating your undergraduate GPA, the following factors may be considered: the age of the grades, exceptionally high grades, difficulty of coursework, time commitments while attending college, dependent care during school, grading patterns at the school attended, and grade trends or discrepancies among your grades.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
PepperJack postSkool wrote:I mean, what's the value added of being in a university/class room at all then? Presumably reading difficult shit with people who are on their game and who hold you accountable for your thoughts pushes people further.PepperJack wrote:Being challenged will make you a better scholar, but you can do this in ways that don't threaten your GPA (eg: a library card).
You take all the risk, but you get the reward too.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
my pre-law advisor said take easy ones.
I'm black too and I had a 3.4 upon leaving my science major...swtiched majors, took some easy classes, and raised that sucker up to a 3.7 which is going to help me out tremendously as it would u
I'm black too and I had a 3.4 upon leaving my science major...swtiched majors, took some easy classes, and raised that sucker up to a 3.7 which is going to help me out tremendously as it would u
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:23 am
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
Pre-law advisors know for the most part that they are redundant and pre-law advice for aspiring undergrads could more or less be boiled down to a note card that says
1. Get a high LSAT score
2. Get a good overall GPA
My past experiences with my university's pre law advisors seemed to indicate that they were hesitant to admit how much of a pure numbers game law school admissions are, and so they'll talk up all of these irrelevant factors such as soft extracurriculars, hard classes, being a member of pre-law societies, being part of undergrad law review (actually a thing at my school. All the source pulls and blue booking for none of the prestige. Great fun). Sure, these things won't hurt, and might give you something to talk about in your PS. But for the most part, it's going to come down to your LSAT score and GPA, with the fact that you're a URM giving you a boost in at least some schools.
1. Get a high LSAT score
2. Get a good overall GPA
My past experiences with my university's pre law advisors seemed to indicate that they were hesitant to admit how much of a pure numbers game law school admissions are, and so they'll talk up all of these irrelevant factors such as soft extracurriculars, hard classes, being a member of pre-law societies, being part of undergrad law review (actually a thing at my school. All the source pulls and blue booking for none of the prestige. Great fun). Sure, these things won't hurt, and might give you something to talk about in your PS. But for the most part, it's going to come down to your LSAT score and GPA, with the fact that you're a URM giving you a boost in at least some schools.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
I don't think going from a 3.6 to a 3.7 will be a huge difference. I landed a full-ride scholarship at a T50 with a gpa in that range and a LSAT below a 150. I would not waste another year of school taking bull-shit classes and wasting money. You are paying an extra year of tuition. You will be far better off studying for the LSAT or working in a sexy pre law school career like management consulting, corporate finance, or I-Banking. At this point, your gpa is what it is. If I would have landed a 160 LSAT, I would have attended Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, PENN or Yale. Meaning a .1 increase won't really do shit for you, but landing a solid LSAT would end all debates.Skool wrote:This whole idea is despicable.
OP needs to graduate and spend the next year getting a life. That this is even under serious consideration is a reflection on OPs crappy judgment, lack of intellectual curiosity, and what appears to be an inability to understand the value of a dollar.
Just get a job, any job, study for the lsat, run, fuck people, read James Joyce, make a new friend, go on a road trip, try new drugs, call your grandma. Live a life and stop being silly.
I suspect that this is the subtext of what your adviser was trying to say to you.
And while you're at it, get off my fucking lawn.
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 1:54 pm
Re: Pre-law adviser said NOT to take all easy classes
1) focus on the LSAT
2) recognize that, as an AA, 3.7 will be different than a 3.6 PROVIDED your LSAT is decent, but not great (i.e. STUDY AND RETAKE FOR HIGHER SCORES, then it won't matter aside from HYS,B )
I personally don't see the value in paying for a full year, let alone staying if you're only doing so for the slight GPA boost. Graduate. Get a job that, if you don't have very marketable skills, is at least something you're interested in. Once you get your score back, decide if you need to retake and keep prepping if necessary.
Also, these people will are the best pre-law advisers you will likely find. Be aware of the lack of self-censoring; it really is the most valuable aspect of 'nony posting.
2) recognize that, as an AA, 3.7 will be different than a 3.6 PROVIDED your LSAT is decent, but not great (i.e. STUDY AND RETAKE FOR HIGHER SCORES, then it won't matter aside from HYS,B )
I personally don't see the value in paying for a full year, let alone staying if you're only doing so for the slight GPA boost. Graduate. Get a job that, if you don't have very marketable skills, is at least something you're interested in. Once you get your score back, decide if you need to retake and keep prepping if necessary.
Also, these people will are the best pre-law advisers you will likely find. Be aware of the lack of self-censoring; it really is the most valuable aspect of 'nony posting.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login