Don't do it. Please don't do it.

I'm curious to know why you say, "don't do it?" What is your reasoning behind your statement? I would think that if one successfully completed the ample program and it led to obtaining a seat in the Fall 2012 semester then the goal of getting into law school would be met. I believe the end justifies the means. Whether the ample program is from Florida Coastal or Charlotte School of Law or from Phoenix Law School, if it means being able to go to law school, I wouldn't pass up that opportunity.

Don't do it. Please don't do it.

You pay a lot of money for the chance to possibly pay full tuition at a school that is absolutely, categorically a terrible idea to attend. You end up six figures in debt and maaaaaybe 5% of your class gets a job that allows them to comfortably pay off that amount.

Unless your parents are rich and are footing the bill. In that case, do whatever. You still probably won't get a good legal job, but at least you won't end up drowning in debt.

If you really want to go to law school, are not planning on taking the lsat again, did not get accepted to any other schools and the only program you got accepted onto in the ample program, then I would say attend the ample program and take your seat into the Fall 2012 entering class. The JD degree is what you make it. Yes, it is true that one can potentially come out of law school with a tremendous amount of debt. However, there are programs where one can work in a state, county or non profit organization for 10 years while making payments on your law school debt and then then the agency will pay off the remainder of you law school loans. So having debt should not be the main reason why one should not go to the ample program if its the persons only option. Debt can go away. But the JD degree and sense on accomplishment of being able to say that you are an attorney at law will not!

If you really want to go to law school, are not planning on taking the lsat again, did not get accepted to any other schools and the only program you got accepted onto in the ample program.

If you really want to go to law school, are not planning on taking the lsat again, did not get accepted to any other schools and the only program you got accepted onto in the ample program, then I would say attend the ample program and take your seat into the Fall 2012 entering class. The JD degree is what you make it. Yes, it is true that one can potentially come out of law school with a tremendous amount of debt. However, there are programs where one can work in a state, county or non profit organization for 10 years while making payments on your law school debt and then then the agency will pay off the remainder of you law school loans. So having debt should not be the main reason why one should not go to the ample program if its the persons only option. Debt can go away. But the JD degree and sense on accomplishment of being able to say that you are an attorney at law will not!

Stop, just stop aample spammer.



Then you should work very hard at getting another job in order to stay out of enormous debt. There will be zero jobs coming out of these schools.

Have you read literally any contemporary news stories about law school today?

Don't feed the troll.

not planning on taking the lsat again

If I could ban one phrase from TLS...

What is your plan for paying off $200k in loans?

Personally, I would make sure not to strap myself with $200k in loans. There is way too much grant money available for anyone to not take advantage of finding alternative means to pay for their law school education.

Personally, I would make sure not to strap myself with $200k in loans. There is way too much grant money available for anyone to not take advantage of finding alternative means to pay for their law school education.

I've actually came across that thread that you put up from that person who got "curved out" of Texas Southern throughout my old research of TMSL threads. What I don't undestand is this whole curve process. I've read about it and for the lide of me still can't understand if someone scores 90's on exams and let's say perhaps the majority of the other students score 80's on their exams, how will that person who scored in the 90's curve downward? A curve is supposed to help those students who did not score well to gain points as a result of the person who scored the highest in the class. Granted, not every student will receive an "A." And I surely don't think that person would waste time to write their experience on a forum about how he got kicked out of law school. From what experience do you have with Thurgood Marshall? Are you going by information that people are writing on forums or are you a current or former student of the school? I'm interested to know if you can give some feedback on your understanding of this downward grading curve as well.

Also, what is a URM?

One most certainly can get into a decent school with a 148 lsat score. You need to do your research. Without students there are no "tuition dollars." That's simple logic.

Think this is a ploy by the phoenix "law school" to try to drum up some numbers now that the "writing is on the wall." (admissions are down) They have a really nice building, I bet it takes a lot of suckers to pay the rent.

I dont think TLS is that important sadly