PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes" Forum
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
NOT in them.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
I'm srry, I meant 40%. 60% in, 40% out.
- rman1201
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:11 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
Cool story, bro.
In all seriousness though I am interested in ND's stats, can you send them to me?
In all seriousness though I am interested in ND's stats, can you send them to me?
- kapital98
- Posts: 1188
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:58 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
You're absolutely right. The 40% should be given more consideration but is left out of most threads. I would place a large wager that the reported salary is biased towards the two peaks. With more complete/accurate reporting the % between the two peaks would increase.
*edit* Take the data and make wage ranges (ex: $60,000-$90,000) to illustrate your point in a bar graph...
*edit* Take the data and make wage ranges (ex: $60,000-$90,000) to illustrate your point in a bar graph...
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
~45 of the people on that graph make 60K and lower. And that is ~45% of reported salary, which only includes the employed. The survey only covers about half of all grads.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
Not that it totally brightens the picture. The graph does include those employed outside of law, which means that only the truly unemployed (extremely rare at 9 months, usually like 1% if I recall) are omitted.Desert Fox wrote:~4536% of the people on that graph make 60K and lower. And that is ~45%36% of reported salary, which only includes the employed.
NALP indicates that it makes very little difference for those in the middle. The aforesaid "business" (table-waiting) category are harder to find for survey, while those in large firms are extraordinarily easy to find. NALP doesn't just correct for that after the fact; they tailor their survey techniques accordingly.Desert Fox wrote:The survey only covers about half of all grads.
I'm probably not gonna do that, but yes, it would illustrate the point quite nicely.kapital98 wrote:*edit* Take the data and make wage ranges (ex: $60,000-$90,000) to illustrate your point in a bar graph...
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
This is wrong because
(1) Those are only employed people
(2) Different markets have different "modes" (e.g. some secondary market might have biglaw at 110 and everything else at 30-40, but on a nationwide graph, their biglaw shows up as between the modes, doesn't mean the jobs are any easier to get or even that they pay differently after adjusting for COL differences).
(1) Those are only employed people
(2) Different markets have different "modes" (e.g. some secondary market might have biglaw at 110 and everything else at 30-40, but on a nationwide graph, their biglaw shows up as between the modes, doesn't mean the jobs are any easier to get or even that they pay differently after adjusting for COL differences).
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
(1) There are very, very few truly unemployed ppl at 9 months out. Graph includes "business" category encompassing non-law jobs.Veyron wrote:This is wrong because
(1) Those are only employed people
(2) Different markets have different "modes" (e.g. some secondary market might have biglaw at 110 and everything else at 30-40, but on a nationwide graph, their biglaw shows up as between the modes, doesn't mean the jobs are any easier to get or even that they pay differently after adjusting for COL differences).
(2a) Those jobs would be included in "between the modes" jobs regardless of whether you call them Biglaw or not, and are thus included in the set of jobs that 40% of us will get. There are also some very prestigious, hard-to-get PI jobs in the left mode; that doesn't change anything in the big picture.
(2b) I think what you're suggesting is that when we see that school x puts 30% of its grads into NLJ250 firms, one has to account for the fact that some of those (but very few, if you check the NLJ250 salaries) jobs pay <$160K. That's fine, but it doesn't then follow that fewer than 40% of LS grads get paid in the middle range, it just means that more than 25% (the integration of the $160K peak) are in Biglaw.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
I think you misunderstand what I am getting at with respect to (2). Its more that one shouldn't think that there are plentiful options if one strikes out at "biglaw" on the basis of the data you presented because much of the areas between the modes IS (regional) biglaw which is no easier to get than NYC 160.flcath wrote:(1) There are very, very few truly unemployed ppl at 9 months out. Graph includes "business" category encompassing non-law jobs.Veyron wrote:This is wrong because
(1) Those are only employed people
(2) Different markets have different "modes" (e.g. some secondary market might have biglaw at 110 and everything else at 30-40, but on a nationwide graph, their biglaw shows up as between the modes, doesn't mean the jobs are any easier to get or even that they pay differently after adjusting for COL differences).
(2a) Those jobs would be included in "between the modes" jobs regardless of whether you call them Biglaw or not, and are thus included in the set of jobs that 40% of us will get. There are also some very prestigious, hard-to-get PI jobs in the left mode; that doesn't change anything in the big picture.
(2b) I think what you're suggesting is that when we see that school x puts 30% of its grads into NLJ250 firms, one has to account for the fact that some of those (but very few, if you check the NLJ250 salaries) jobs pay <$160K. That's fine, but it doesn't then follow that fewer than 40% of LS grads get paid in the middle range, it just means that more than 25% (the integration of the $160K peak) are in Biglaw.
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
I thought you were dropping out of law school op?
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:57 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
There's like an 80% chance you won't be able to pay your loans after graduation.rose711 wrote:I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
1800LNewbie wrote:There's like an 80% chance you won't be able to pay your loans after graduation.rose711 wrote:I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:57 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
I actually don't have any loans and I graduated several years ago. I can't even tell if this reply is being sarcastic or not.0LNewbie wrote:There's like an 80% chance you won't be able to pay your loans after graduation.rose711 wrote:I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
Sorry, I don't understand the statistical discussions, but I want to. I have several friends and relatives interested in applying to law schools and in the current law market and they are asking me for help. I will not be in a position to offer them jobs when they graduate. I don't think they should take on major debt to go to law school and I am trying to back up that position. I am conservative so major to me is anything more than $50,000.
So can you try explaining it again?
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
did u guys plan this back and forth? b/c i literally laughed for 45 to 50 seconds. 1 fucking 80.0LNewbie wrote:There's like an 80% chance you won't be able to pay your loans after graduation.rose711 wrote:I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
If you think he is being sarcastic, you really HAVE been out of the game for a while.rose711 wrote:I actually don't have any loans and I graduated several years ago. I can't even tell if this reply is being sarcastic or not.0LNewbie wrote:There's like an 80% chance you won't be able to pay your loans after graduation.rose711 wrote:I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
Sorry, I don't understand the statistical discussions, but I want to. I have several friends and relatives interested in applying to law schools and in the current law market and they are asking me for help. I will not be in a position to offer them jobs when they graduate. I don't think they should take on major debt to go to law school and I am trying to back up that position. I am conservative so major to me is anything more than $50,000.
So can you try explaining it again?
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
the reply is sarcastic, but true, which makes is funny.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
What's with the blatant anti-Georgetown trolling all around?flcath wrote:NOT in them.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
Ok, I'll bite, how does one land a "midlaw" gig?NOT in them.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
Easy. Network, hustle, use all of your resources, keep a positive attitude, find a firm that realizes your personality is a good fit for them, and hope it's the one out of every 3 years they decide to hire for an entry-level position.Veyron wrote:Ok, I'll bite, how does one land a "midlaw" gig?NOT in them.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
i think you lost him0LNewbie wrote:Easy. Network, hustle, use all of your resources, keep a positive attitude, find a firm that realizes your personality is a good fit for them, and hope it's the one out of every 3 years they decide to hire for an entry-level position.Veyron wrote:Ok, I'll bite, how does one land a "midlaw" gig?NOT in them.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
Which firms pay $200K?
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
0LNewbie wrote:Easy. Network, hustle, use all of your resources, keep a positive attitude, find a firm that realizes your personality is a good fit for them, and hope it's the one out of every 3 years they decide to hire for an entry-level position.Veyron wrote:Ok, I'll bite, how does one land a "midlaw" gig?NOT in them.
This consideration is almost categorically overlooked when weighing LS options. Also, these jobs--to the extent to which they go to first years at all (which is admittedly not the standard midlaw hiring model)--DO tend to go to those who fall just shy of Biglaw. Most (yes, most: over 50%) ppl who miss Biglaw at the T13s go into the middle range, as do most T25ish kids.
I have a .pdf document (which I will post if TLS lets me) accounting for every member of the NDLS c/o 2009--firm and city. MOST of them are midlaw gigs; the 2nd largest number is Biglaw; the 3rd is gov't work.
I think much of TLS does not stop to think about how these graphs work. There is a spike at $160K b/c of market matching by firms; the "spikes" are not as significant as the overall integration of the various salary ranges. There is enough integrated "area" in the middle range to form several similarly-sized spikes... but that doesn't happen, since there isn't the widespread salary matching in that sector.
Edit: Wait, you a 0L, WTF are you doing giving advice? STFU
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: PSA: Roughly 60% of 1st yrs will land b/t the salary "modes"
No sarcasm.rose711 wrote:I actually don't have any loans and I graduated several years ago. I can't even tell if this reply is being sarcastic or not.0LNewbie wrote:There's like an 80% chance you won't be able to pay your loans after graduation.rose711 wrote:I don't understand what this is saying. Can you explain it another way?
Sorry, I don't understand the statistical discussions, but I want to. I have several friends and relatives interested in applying to law schools and in the current law market and they are asking me for help. I will not be in a position to offer them jobs when they graduate. I don't think they should take on major debt to go to law school and I am trying to back up that position. I am conservative so major to me is anything more than $50,000.
So can you try explaining it again?
For those with 6 figures of debt, it's unlikely that debt will be serviceable with a salary between 40 and 60K (it would give pauper a new meaning). There's a better chance that one could do that making, say, 80K, but those jobs are few. The next viable option is biglaw. The chances of obtaining a biglaw job vary widely depending on where one attends, but outside of T6 or so, your chances are no better than 1 in 3.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login