T-14 Ranked by Class Size Forum
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Using 2012 data from this thread: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... s#p3185309
From smallest to biggest class sizes:
1. Stanford University 170
2. University of Chicago 191
3. Cornell University 205
4. Yale University 214
5. Duke University 228
6. University of Pennsylvania 255
7. Northwestern University 271
8. University of California – Berkeley 292
9. University of Virginia 368
10. University of Michigan 371
11. Columbia University 397
12. New York University 450
13. Georgetown University 463
14. Harvard University 559
From smallest to biggest class sizes:
1. Stanford University 170
2. University of Chicago 191
3. Cornell University 205
4. Yale University 214
5. Duke University 228
6. University of Pennsylvania 255
7. Northwestern University 271
8. University of California – Berkeley 292
9. University of Virginia 368
10. University of Michigan 371
11. Columbia University 397
12. New York University 450
13. Georgetown University 463
14. Harvard University 559
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:19 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
very curious.
is georgetown the only one of T14 w/ a part-time program?
is georgetown the only one of T14 w/ a part-time program?
- arism87
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Interesting! I didn't realize Chicago was so small
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
ITT: Knock finds a way to rank Stanford 1st 
ETA: bonus points for Chicago being second. Eski loves you extraz nao.

ETA: bonus points for Chicago being second. Eski loves you extraz nao.
- megaTTTron
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:26 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Haha. I was surprised, I thought you'd rank it the opposite way.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
lol read post abovemegaTTTron wrote:Haha. I was surprised, I thought you'd rank it the opposite way.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Knock's next thread: "T14 Ranked by Proximity to Stanford, CA"
Guess which one comes out on top!
Guess which one comes out on top!
- T6Hopeful
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:30 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
I posted this in the other thread where Knock posted this, but I think I do remember there being info that Georgetown is lowering its PT a bit (becoming more selective) and consequently bumping up its FT class size. I could be wrong, but 463 could be somewhat of an important distinction from 500+.
-
- Posts: 706
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:42 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Wow, I thought Georgetown had a larger 1L class than Havard.
- SemperLegal
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:28 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means, according to TLS wisdom, each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired. The rest become janitors.
Last edited by SemperLegal on Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- prezidentv8
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
FTWSemperLegal wrote:For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means according to TLS wisdom each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired, with the rest becoming janitors.
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
+1Bildungsroman wrote:Knock's next thread: "T14 Ranked by Proximity to Stanford, CA"
Guess which one comes out on top!
hahaha
- SemperLegal
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:28 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
SemperLegal wrote:For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means, according to TLS wisdom, each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired. The rest become janitors.
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread, but since 60,746 took the LSAT in 2010, and applications around 30,000, you need to do better then 92.8% of applicants, which means a 165, to break into the T14
I know, theres a lot of unwarranted assumptions, but i thought that was interesting
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Not saying your logic is right, but that happens to be the 25%ile for CornellSemperLegal wrote:SemperLegal wrote:For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means, according to TLS wisdom, each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired. The rest become janitors.
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread, but since 60,746 took the LSAT in 2010, and applications around 30,000, you need to do better then 92.8% of applicants, which means a 165, to break into the T14
I know, theres a lot of unwarranted assumptions, but i thought that was interesting
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
First year section size is another story, however. Yale, Stanford & Northwestern offer the smallest class sizes while Cornell is about 100 students per section. Duke & Virginia follow NU.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
If part-time students are included, Georgetown's first year class size is the largest, then Harvard.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
That's just Oct LSATs. Total LSAT's was north of 150,000 for the year.SemperLegal wrote:SemperLegal wrote:For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means, according to TLS wisdom, each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired. The rest become janitors.
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread, but since 60,746 took the LSAT in 2010, and applications around 30,000, you need to do better then 92.8% of applicants, which means a 165, to break into the T14
I know, theres a lot of unwarranted assumptions, but i thought that was interesting
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Top 14 by first year section size:
Yale 58
Stanford 60
Northwestern 65
Duke 68
Virginia 72
Harvard 80
Penn 85
NYU 89
UCal-Berkeley 90
Michigan 91
Chicago 93
Columbia 95
Cornell 100
Georgetown 117
Yale 58
Stanford 60
Northwestern 65
Duke 68
Virginia 72
Harvard 80
Penn 85
NYU 89
UCal-Berkeley 90
Michigan 91
Chicago 93
Columbia 95
Cornell 100
Georgetown 117
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
How much does section size matter? Does it influence grades substantially, or just the "feel" of the school?CanadianWolf wrote:Top 14 by first year section size:
Yale 58
Stanford 60
Northwestern 65
Duke 68
Virginia 72
Harvard 80
Penn 85
NYU 89
UCal-Berkeley 90
Michigan 91
Chicago 93
Columbia 95
Cornell 100
Georgetown 117
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Personal preference & a better chance of getting to know your professors & section classmates. Also increases the liklihood of getting called on in class.
Last edited by CanadianWolf on Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- SemperLegal
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:28 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
My bad, thats 171,514 in the last cycle and 87,500 applications. RC fail.rayiner wrote:That's just Oct LSATs. Total LSAT's was north of 150,000 for the year.SemperLegal wrote:SemperLegal wrote:For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means, according to TLS wisdom, each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired. The rest become janitors.
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread, but since 60,746 took the LSAT in 2010, and applications around 30,000, you need to do better then 92.8% of applicants, which means a 165, to break into the T14
I know, theres a lot of unwarranted assumptions, but i thought that was interesting
New break even number= doing better than 97.5%, a solid 170 on the dot.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Which makes sense. Most of the T14 is at 170 medians, so you know at least half those 4,300 slots are for people with > 170 and > 3.7-ish. A lot of people with 170s won't have the requisite 3.7 GPA for that LSAT score (3.4/170 isn't a lock at any T14 without WE) and people will take scholarships or not go to law school, and people between 165-170 will get those spots.SemperLegal wrote:My bad, thats 171,514 in the last cycle and 87,500 applications. RC fail.rayiner wrote:That's just Oct LSATs. Total LSAT's was north of 150,000 for the year.SemperLegal wrote:SemperLegal wrote:For those that care enough to read but not enough to add, thats 4434 spaces. Which means, according to TLS wisdom, each year only 443.4 lawyers are hired. The rest become janitors.
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread, but since 60,746 took the LSAT in 2010, and applications around 30,000, you need to do better then 92.8% of applicants, which means a 165, to break into the T14
I know, theres a lot of unwarranted assumptions, but i thought that was interesting
New break even number= doing better than 97.5%, a solid 170 on the dot.
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
yeah, i was really surprised to to see that.. I had heard that G-town was by far the biggest law school, but it looks like that's not really the case (though i realize this apparently doesn't count part-time).dissonance1848 wrote:Wow, I thought Georgetown had a larger 1L class than Havard.
- SemperLegal
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:28 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
Yup, this numbers "feel" right. I, as a high GPA 169er, eagerly await your table scraps.rayiner wrote: Which makes sense. Most of the T14 is at 170 medians, so you know at least half those 4,300 slots are for people with > 170 and > 3.7-ish. A lot of people with 170s won't have the requisite 3.7 GPA for that LSAT score (3.4/170 isn't a lock at any T14 without WE) and people will take scholarships or not go to law school, and people between 165-170 will get those spots.
This does go to show you why LSAT>GPA>EVERYTHING ELSE in LS application. Its the only thing that is nearly close to constant since the size of the T14 is fairly static (I think) but the size of the applicant pool/grade inflation adjust the average GPA's. If your >170 than the T14 is yours to lose. If you are <170 your really have to justify your presence in the T14.
Someone want to do the same for Tier 1?
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: T-14 Ranked by Class Size
The problem with high GPA is only really high GPA = high GPA. Almost every t14 has a GPA median of 3.8.SemperLegal wrote:Yup, this numbers "feel" right. I, as a high GPA 169er, eagerly await your table scraps.rayiner wrote: Which makes sense. Most of the T14 is at 170 medians, so you know at least half those 4,300 slots are for people with > 170 and > 3.7-ish. A lot of people with 170s won't have the requisite 3.7 GPA for that LSAT score (3.4/170 isn't a lock at any T14 without WE) and people will take scholarships or not go to law school, and people between 165-170 will get those spots.
This does go to show you why LSAT>GPA>EVERYTHING ELSE in LS application. Its the only thing that is nearly close to constant since the size of the T14 is fairly static (I think) but the size of the applicant pool/grade inflation adjust the average GPA's. If your >170 than the T14 is yours to lose. If you are <170 your really have to justify your presence in the T14.
Someone want to do the same for Tier 1?
There are probably more people with 3.8+/165 than there are any people with 170.
Looking at my LSAC transcript report 15% of my UG got 3.8 or better. Maybe 5% got 170 or better and I went to a state flagship. Imagine TTT undergrads. Still 15% have 3.8 but almost nobody gets 170.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login