Section Stacking? Forum
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Section Stacking?
I have heard that some schools place a disproportionate number of scholarship students in particular sections.
Is this true? Is there any evidence of this happening?
Section stacking would, I believe, make it harder for scholarship students to rank, easier for non-scholarship students to rank, and ensure that a particular proportion of scholarship students are unable to renew.
Is this true? Is there any evidence of this happening?
Section stacking would, I believe, make it harder for scholarship students to rank, easier for non-scholarship students to rank, and ensure that a particular proportion of scholarship students are unable to renew.
- CE2JD
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:33 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
My section was stacked.whuts4lunch wrote:I have heard that some schools place a disproportionate number of scholarship students in particular sections.
Is this true? Is there any evidence of this happening?
Section stacking would, I believe, make it harder for scholarship students to rank, easier for non-scholarship students to rank, and ensure that a particular proportion of scholarship students are unable to renew.

- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
What school? Are you a scholarship student? What evidence are you basing your claim on?
- CE2JD
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:33 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
UVA
No
My section had smarter people than all the other sections
No
My section had smarter people than all the other sections
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
moved to this threadyoyoma wrote:Hello TLS,
I am a long-time lurker, first time poster. I wanted to first thank everyone that contributes to this site for all of the priceless information I have received.
I am writing because there was a reference to section stacking in another thread, and I wanted to know if this was anything more than a rumor. I recently received a full ride to Minnesota, which was a huge surprise given my decent but not great numbers. Minnesota was not really on my radar, and I more or less applied because of a fee waiver. I originally hoped to sneak into the bottom half of the T14 and pay sticker, but the full ride vaulted Minnesota to the top of my list. A 2.5 is required to keep the scholarship, which does not seem like much, but the concept of section stacking scares me a little. Is this something I need to worry about with Minnesota or is it merely a rumor?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
bump because this is kinda a big deal...
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Section Stacking?
Thanks!whuts4lunch wrote:moved to this threadyoyoma wrote:Hello TLS,
I am a long-time lurker, first time poster. I wanted to first thank everyone that contributes to this site for all of the priceless information I have received.
I am writing because there was a reference to section stacking in another thread, and I wanted to know if this was anything more than a rumor. I recently received a full ride to Minnesota, which was a huge surprise given my decent but not great numbers. Minnesota was not really on my radar, and I more or less applied because of a fee waiver. I originally hoped to sneak into the bottom half of the T14 and pay sticker, but the full ride vaulted Minnesota to the top of my list. A 2.5 is required to keep the scholarship, which does not seem like much, but the concept of section stacking scares me a little. Is this something I need to worry about with Minnesota or is it merely a rumor?
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
In another thread, someone mentioned that yoyoma would only have to outrank approximately 20% of the students to maintain the scholarship.
That still means that 1 out of 5 students doesn't do that, making it a decently large risk. This would be against mostly scholarship students if the school stacks.
Even if you place top 25%, you have to think that you would probably have placed higher if there was no stacking, right?
That still means that 1 out of 5 students doesn't do that, making it a decently large risk. This would be against mostly scholarship students if the school stacks.
Even if you place top 25%, you have to think that you would probably have placed higher if there was no stacking, right?
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
whuts4lunch wrote:I have heard that some schools place a disproportionate number of scholarship students in particular sections.
Is this true? Is there any evidence of this happening?
Section stacking would, I believe, make it harder for scholarship students to rank, easier for non-scholarship students to rank, and ensure that a particular proportion of scholarship students are unable to renew.
Yes- I'd be wary of any school that gives out a lot of scholarships with GPA strings attached- section stacking is a really simple way for them to appear generous to prospectives while ensuring that a ton of that $$ inevitably gets yanked. You can really only hear about it anecdotally from current students, so they can get away with it every year. I hear about this mostly being a noticeable problem at T3/T4 schools, but I've also heard the same from a girl I know at a T50 school & a few other places that have been thrown around in old threads
- SamSeaborn2016
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:07 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
I'm not sure how common it is but I assume it takes place at least a few schools. I'm quite wary of scholarships with GPA/class ranking requirements, though.
- chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
Tag. Although I am not so sure about section stacking, it is very interesting to note how sections develop very different personalities. A purely random assignment suggests that is is indeed possible that one section may have a disproportionate amount of "scholarship" students than another section.
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
What is the point of sectioning students? It seems that by doing so, it opens up the possibility that X GPA does not correspond to the same level of performance across sections.
- chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
Interesting point ... I would be in favor of not having actually doctrinal courses by sections. Quite frankly, I grew very tired of hearing the same irrational voices every single day of the week! Outside of bar review, there was very little opportunity to meet people from other sections. In the end, I imagine that this what years 2 and 3 are for ...whuts4lunch wrote:What is the point of sectioning students? It seems that by doing so, it opens up the possibility that X GPA does not correspond to the same level of performance across sections.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sarlis
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:30 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
So it seems that this is a rare occurrence? Also, every scholarship offer I have received have GPa stipulations, I thought that was common/happens in every case.
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
GPA stipulations are soooo scary. Losing the scholarship not only will cost ~60 thousand dollars (higher or lower depending on how big a scholarship), but not hitting the requisite GPA also means that job opportunities that would allow one to comfortably pay back loans won't be available. I am NOT down with that.
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
Also, if a scholarship has a GPA stipulation, it gives the school ample incentive to section stack, which would not only increase the risk of losing the scholarship, but almost invariably result in a lower GPA.
- sarlis
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:30 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
Again, how common are GPA stipulations. Every scholly offer I have received has a GPA stipulation.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
I don't know. I hear they are common for California schools.
- chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
I found that scholarship stipulations became less common the higher ranked the school. For example, I believe that many t-14 scholarships simply require you to be in good academic standing (i.e. don't cheat and turn all finals / writing assingments when due), while a number of T2 schools seemingly had stipulations that would have required me to remain in the top-half.sarlis wrote:So it seems that this is a rare occurrence? Also, every scholarship offer I have received have GPa stipulations, I thought that was common/happens in every case.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Section Stacking?
This is mostly common outside T1 schools. I know I read last year that a few schools are especially notorious for this (*cough*Miami*cough*). Your classes are graded on a curve, and you're assigned to your 1L classes by section, so if you've all received a scholarship that requires you stay in the top 1/3 of your class, by default 2/3 of your section is going to have to lose the scholarship after the first year.
I would be extremely wary of any school that mandates minimum GPAs. You can always try to negotiate this; contact the school and tell them, "I'll commit to attending if you remove the minimum GPA requirement," or something along those lines. Their response ought to prove interesting, at least.
I would be extremely wary of any school that mandates minimum GPAs. You can always try to negotiate this; contact the school and tell them, "I'll commit to attending if you remove the minimum GPA requirement," or something along those lines. Their response ought to prove interesting, at least.
- sarlis
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:30 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
This has been the case with me so far. But, does this automatically imply that the schools section stack?chadwick218 wrote:I found that scholarship stipulations became less common the higher ranked the school. For example, I believe that many t-14 scholarships simply require you to be in good academic standing (i.e. don't cheat and turn all finals / writing assingments when due), while a number of T2 schools seemingly had stipulations that would have required me to remain in the top-half.sarlis wrote:So it seems that this is a rare occurrence? Also, every scholarship offer I have received have GPa stipulations, I thought that was common/happens in every case.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- whuts4lunch
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
it gives them incentive to stack, and that is enough for me to be very wary
- usuaggie
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
I just got an offer from McGeorge with a GPA stipulation. Top 1/3. This is pretty relaxed compared to some others I have seen (top 10, 15, 20 percent). You are going to try your hardest anyway, right? So just do better than the other kids and be one of the ones to keep your scholly
- chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: Section Stacking?
Although I have heard such rumors, I generally do not believe this to be the case. In terms of section stacking, if anything, I think that as universities try to artificially manufacture diversity and create a balance by ensuring that every section has an appropriate number of students coming from different backgrounds and viewpoints. Ultimately, I don't think that law schools care about their students whatsoever so long as the tuition checks come in job placement is satisfactory!sarlis wrote:This has been the case with me so far. But, does this automatically imply that the schools section stack?chadwick218 wrote:I found that scholarship stipulations became less common the higher ranked the school. For example, I believe that many t-14 scholarships simply require you to be in good academic standing (i.e. don't cheat and turn all finals / writing assingments when due), while a number of T2 schools seemingly had stipulations that would have required me to remain in the top-half.sarlis wrote:So it seems that this is a rare occurrence? Also, every scholarship offer I have received have GPa stipulations, I thought that was common/happens in every case.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Section Stacking?
Hey vanwinkle,vanwinkle wrote:This is mostly common outside T1 schools. I know I read last year that a few schools are especially notorious for this (*cough*Miami*cough*). Your classes are graded on a curve, and you're assigned to your 1L classes by section, so if you've all received a scholarship that requires you stay in the top 1/3 of your class, by default 2/3 of your section is going to have to lose the scholarship after the first year.
I would be extremely wary of any school that mandates minimum GPAs. You can always try to negotiate this; contact the school and tell them, "I'll commit to attending if you remove the minimum GPA requirement," or something along those lines. Their response ought to prove interesting, at least.
I've been reading TLS for a while and have noticed that you give a lot of useful, well thought out advice. I was wondering if you knew anything about Minnesota and their policies regarding section stacking. My situation is quoted at the beginning of the thread. Thanks!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login