
Looking to practice in Southern California... gunning for Big Law but ..... a free ride could possibly open me up to other routes..
Anyone?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
No haven't heard officially, but c'mon its Berk.... they're not gonna give me anything...agalang wrote:You got your offer from Berkeley already? How/where?
They matched one of my classmates' T50 scholly offers.but c'mon its Berk.... they're not gonna give me anything...
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
SBL wrote:Consider the worst case scenarios:
You fail to get biglaw from Cal: You're stuck with a huge bill and no good way to get rid of it.
You fail to get biglaw from USC: You take a lower-paying job and enjoy your debt-free life.
No brainer IMO. Unless you want to do academia or clerk, then probably Cal.
Regarding the bolded, USC's big law placement has never been this low. It has consistently been in the 30-40% range (and was even higher than that during the boom years). It sounds like you really want Berkeley though for some reason. Did USC offer you the Rothman scholarship or not? If so, I would say go to USC hands down. If not, I would still say go to USC. Yes Berkeley is a better school, but there's no way a Boalt JD is worth 150k more than a USC JD, unless money isn't an object for you and you have no intention of working in Southern California.Mr.Hart wrote:I'm surprised at everyone voting USC.. isn't Boalt supposed to be ELITE, only falling behind Stanford in CA? Isn't it supposed to open you up to the widest career possibilities, and give you a great badge of honor to carry throughout life? Sure their BigLaw numbers aren't as great as they were pre-crash, but despite being in the 40% range (which I'm sure is higher now since those NLJ numbers are 3 years old), isn't that still WAY better than USC's numbers (20%)? And what do you guys think about difficulty of excelling at either school.... a lot of people say that the LSAT is a bad indicator of law school performance, and that its not necessarily true that Berk kids will do better than SC kids... but I somewhat disagree.. While its true ur not tested on Logic Games in law school, the essence of the LSAT was to test your ability to adapt and excel on a completely unfamiliar test format, the same skill that is needed on law school exams.... so wouldn't it make sense that the average Berk student will probably spot a couple more issues on the exams than the average SC kid, making it more difficult to do well? I know must of us swear we'll never be in the bottom 1/3 but there's always a good group of smart people in there.... I'm bad at math and admit that despite trying my absolute best I still got ROCKED by math-phenom asian kids in some undergrad econ classes at UCLA... any input on this Chimp/Shaggier?
I know it might sound like I am all about berkeley but I'm just trying to figure out where these questions fit for those voting for USC...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
OP hasn't logged in in a long time. No need to bump a dead thread.kprempeh89 wrote:Wow curious to see what you decided to go with. To me, this is USC by a long shot.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login