Duke v GULC Forum
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:13 pm
Duke v GULC
Some concerns:
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:35 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
lmao, I can't wait to see where this goes.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
In regards to #2, no you cannot live there. They actually section off Durham and it has 0 residents. you have to live in a neighboring town and commute. it's some odd law from the 1800's. I've never really understood it.
- Moral_Midgetry
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
1) Minimal to non-existant at both.StickyIcky wrote:Some concerns:
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
2/3) No, live in Chapel Hill.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
i'd give duke a slight edge in quality of weed, but if you're into any harder drugs i think D.C. wins hands-down for obvious reasons.1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
it's good for chillin' like a villain, maxin' relaxin'. i think you'll be fine.2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
this is a tough one. by my calculations, about 80% of white people in D.C. are women. with more to choose from, you're bound to find more attractive targets. then again, at duke you don't have to worry if they're DTF or not. that was a rape joke, in case you missed it (since you're probably stoned).3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
no worries bro, you seem like a real straight shooter, and i appreciate that.If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
pleasure was all mine.Thanks.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:13 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
fatduck wrote:i'd give duke a slight edge in quality of weed, but if you're into any harder drugs i think D.C. wins hands-down for obvious reasons.1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
it's good for chillin' like a villain, maxin' relaxin'. i think you'll be fine.2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
this is a tough one. by my calculations, about 80% of white people in D.C. are women. with more to choose from, you're bound to find more attractive targets. then again, at duke you don't have to worry if they're DTF or not. that was a rape joke, in case you missed it (since you're probably stoned).3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
no worries bro, you seem like a real straight shooter, and i appreciate that.If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
pleasure was all mine.Thanks.
Immensely helpful, thanks so much. Seriously appreciated.
- Nogameisfair
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
There are plenty of DTF in DC, the transient nature of the city makes casual sexual interaction fairly normal. The problem is in the attractiveness area. I don't know much about Durham, but I think almost any place would have a higher percentage or attractive women. I'll be heading to NYC asap.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:17 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
This thread is relevant to my interests. I have related questions to add to your list:StickyIcky wrote:Some concerns:
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
4) Where is the street price of crack cheaper? Durham or Washington D.C.? (Quality is not an issue, as I will be focusing more on quantity.)
5) Which city is most friendly to necrophiliacs?
6) Is time travel legal in North Carolina?
Once I get answers to these questions, I will be able to make an informed decision on which law school to attend.
- edgarfigaro
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:53 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
Live in Carrboro with the dirty hippies instead of Durham and you'll be fine. Coeds at UNC are both fairly attractive and super desperate.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
4.) D.C. by a mileemmbar53 wrote:This thread is relevant to my interests. I have related questions to add to your list:StickyIcky wrote:Some concerns:
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
4) Where is the street price of crack cheaper? Durham or Washington D.C.? (Quality is not an issue, as I will be focusing more on quantity.)
5) Which city is most friendly to necrophiliacs?
6) Is time travel legal in North Carolina?
Once I get answers to these questions, I will be able to make an informed decision on which law school to attend.
5.) probably Durham. while D.C. has more graves per capita, it also has some of the most prestigious (Arlington), and they are heavily guarded
6.) yes, but the law was only passed a couple years ago, so if you're going further back than that you'll be fine
- Alex-Trof
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:42 am
Re: Duke v GULC
emmbar53 wrote:This thread is relevant to my interests. I have related questions to add to your list:StickyIcky wrote:Some concerns:
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
4) Where is the street price of crack cheaper? Durham or Washington D.C.? (Quality is not an issue, as I will be focusing more on quantity.)
5) Which city is most friendly to necrophiliacs?
6) Is time travel legal in North Carolina?
Once I get answers to these questions, I will be able to make an informed decision on which law school to attend.
To some people quality of life (which may include weed, women, and what not) is relevant when picking a place to spend 3 years. There is no need to pass judgments.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:30 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
1) dont know
2) dont know but Chapel Hill is supposed to be baller
3) all my UNC friends say girls at UNC are desperate due to girl guy ratio 2:1 (flaunting a duke law pedigree could prolly get mad ass in durham/chapel hill as well) or something and DC women have reputation for being ugly
2) dont know but Chapel Hill is supposed to be baller
3) all my UNC friends say girls at UNC are desperate due to girl guy ratio 2:1 (flaunting a duke law pedigree could prolly get mad ass in durham/chapel hill as well) or something and DC women have reputation for being ugly
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:13 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
+1Alex-Trof wrote:To some people quality of life (which may include weed, women, and what not) is relevant when picking a place to spend 3 years. There is no need to pass judgments.
Thanks all for the advice everyone.
To all the haters, maybe it will relax you to know I plan on going into public interest and want to work hard at the school I choose and get good grades.
However, I won't be ashamed that some of my passionate interests include weed and sex. I'm honestly freaked out at some of the things "normal" people enjoy (hiking and bar hopping come to mind), but I'd never pass judgment. To each her own.
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:44 am
Re: Duke v GULC
Duke girls' looks are notorious within North Carolina
Take that how you will
Take that how you will
-
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:35 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Moral_Midgetry
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
Duke's females are a collection of the ugliest smart chicks from Jersey.protein wrote:Duke girls' looks are notorious within North Carolina
Take that how you will
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
1. The only things to do in NC are drink and get high.
2. Yes, but I'd recommend joining a gang if you want to outlive your lease.
3. The response about the 2:1 ratio at UNC and chicks being desperate is absolutely credited. If you're looking to stay closer to home, I'd recommend hitting up Duke UG frat parties. Rohypnol is a standard drink ingredient for them.
2. Yes, but I'd recommend joining a gang if you want to outlive your lease.
3. The response about the 2:1 ratio at UNC and chicks being desperate is absolutely credited. If you're looking to stay closer to home, I'd recommend hitting up Duke UG frat parties. Rohypnol is a standard drink ingredient for them.
- Moral_Midgetry
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
NYT can verify: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.htmlMagnolia wrote:3. The response about the 2:1 ratio at UNC and chicks being desperate is absolutely credited.
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
My conservative friends who went there got slutty. My slutty friends who went there got even sluttier. UNC spreads legs.Moral_Midgetry wrote:NYT can verify: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.htmlMagnolia wrote:3. The response about the 2:1 ratio at UNC and chicks being desperate is absolutely credited.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:17 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
Yea, it's great for a future lawyer to routinely buy weed. Breaking the law is a surefire way to pass the bar.Alex-Trof wrote:emmbar53 wrote:This thread is relevant to my interests. I have related questions to add to your list:StickyIcky wrote:Some concerns:
1) Any elements of stoner culture (hence my username)
2) Is Durham an actual place to live?
3) Attractiveness/DTFness of females
If you are morally repulsed by my concerns, that's fine, just ignore this thread. If you'd like to help, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
4) Where is the street price of crack cheaper? Durham or Washington D.C.? (Quality is not an issue, as I will be focusing more on quantity.)
5) Which city is most friendly to necrophiliacs?
6) Is time travel legal in North Carolina?
Once I get answers to these questions, I will be able to make an informed decision on which law school to attend.
To some people quality of life (which may include weed, women, and what not) is relevant when picking a place to spend 3 years. There is no need to pass judgments.
Please don't give legitimacy to this guy's concerns. Expected lifestyle is one thing. Hoping to illegally buy drugs is another.
And there are fuckable people wherever you go, so that issue is irrelevant.
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
StickyIcky, I am being absolutely sincere when I say that I hope you choose Duke.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:13 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
your theory of legal positivism is so persuasive. i like how you just say that illegal = bad/don't do it, and leave it at that. pretty brilliant analysis if you ask me. thanks mr. mackey.emmbar53 wrote: Yea, it's great for a future lawyer to routinely buy weed. Breaking the law is a surefire way to pass the bar.
Please don't give legitimacy to this guy's concerns. Expected lifestyle is one thing. Hoping to illegally buy drugs is another.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:17 pm
Re: Duke v GULC
Ha, I didn't say that illegal = bad. I believe weed should be legalized.StickyIcky wrote:your theory of legal positivism is so persuasive. i like how you just say that illegal = bad/don't do it, and leave it at that. pretty brilliant analysis if you ask me. thanks mr. mackey.emmbar53 wrote: Yea, it's great for a future lawyer to routinely buy weed. Breaking the law is a surefire way to pass the bar.
Please don't give legitimacy to this guy's concerns. Expected lifestyle is one thing. Hoping to illegally buy drugs is another.
What I said was performing illegal action=bad way to start legal career.
Not making any sort of moral condemnation. Just saying that, practically speaking, it's a bad decision.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login