Should I ED to UCLA? 3.756/171
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 10:49 pm
Hi all,
I am thinking about EDing to the UCLA Distinguished Scholars Program. It is a full tuition scholarship. If I don't ED, I'll apply to the UCLA Law Achievement Fellowship Program which is non-binding but full tuition. It's for disadvantaged students (I fit the bill). You can't apply to both.
My goal is to do transactional work in SoCal biglaw and I have no ties to California. I'm from the east coast and I want to study in California. I'm moderately debt averse, and would not pay sticker anywhere besides maybe Stanford. These are the schools I'm seriously considering:
Stanford: My ideal choice. I doubt I would get in with my GPA. My GPA is not a 4.0 because of one semester only, for which I'm writing an addendum. My LSAT is at their median. I'm unlikely to get in and I'm aware but I wish I could get in, lol. I'm not too sure if it would be worth the big price if I just want Los Angeles biglaw. I don't want a federal clerkship or a gig at an elite litigation boutique.
Berkeley: Seems all around perfect for my goals, but they are stingy with scholarships. I was thinking of applying to other T-14s to try and match scholarships here.
UCLA: If I got in with a full scholarship, it would be a solid choice as I want to practice in Los Angeles and their biglaw + federal clerkship rate is about 45%. That figure impresses and scares me. I know that 15% does PI. But I basically don't know how competitive it will be to get biglaw. TLS says to assume median, and if I am, then I don't know if I'll be in a good enough position.
USC: If I got the Rothman full tuition scholarship, I'd take it in a heartbeat. It also comes with a stipend and a guaranteed 1L SA at Skadden. But it's only given to one student and I doubt that would be me. Otherwise, I wouldn't go to USC and would go to UCLA instead.
What do you advise, TLS?
I am thinking about EDing to the UCLA Distinguished Scholars Program. It is a full tuition scholarship. If I don't ED, I'll apply to the UCLA Law Achievement Fellowship Program which is non-binding but full tuition. It's for disadvantaged students (I fit the bill). You can't apply to both.
My goal is to do transactional work in SoCal biglaw and I have no ties to California. I'm from the east coast and I want to study in California. I'm moderately debt averse, and would not pay sticker anywhere besides maybe Stanford. These are the schools I'm seriously considering:
Stanford: My ideal choice. I doubt I would get in with my GPA. My GPA is not a 4.0 because of one semester only, for which I'm writing an addendum. My LSAT is at their median. I'm unlikely to get in and I'm aware but I wish I could get in, lol. I'm not too sure if it would be worth the big price if I just want Los Angeles biglaw. I don't want a federal clerkship or a gig at an elite litigation boutique.
Berkeley: Seems all around perfect for my goals, but they are stingy with scholarships. I was thinking of applying to other T-14s to try and match scholarships here.
UCLA: If I got in with a full scholarship, it would be a solid choice as I want to practice in Los Angeles and their biglaw + federal clerkship rate is about 45%. That figure impresses and scares me. I know that 15% does PI. But I basically don't know how competitive it will be to get biglaw. TLS says to assume median, and if I am, then I don't know if I'll be in a good enough position.
USC: If I got the Rothman full tuition scholarship, I'd take it in a heartbeat. It also comes with a stipend and a guaranteed 1L SA at Skadden. But it's only given to one student and I doubt that would be me. Otherwise, I wouldn't go to USC and would go to UCLA instead.
What do you advise, TLS?