Page 1 of 1

Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:51 pm
by Yeezus
Or is this just a waste of money? I'm a non-URM with average softs, LORs, and mediocre (probably below average) WE.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 7:04 pm
by ballcaps
in the past four years 119 lsn users applied with similar stats, and 7 got in.

that's 5.8%. up to you to judge if that's worth the $113 it costs to apply.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 7:30 pm
by Rigo
You would have a better chance this cycle than any other cycle.
Yeah the odds are long, but why not if you can afford the application fee and are fine with riding the waitlist?

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 7:36 pm
by t-14orbust
Personally think it's a waste considering below/at 25th%'s and nothing special(not that you aren't probably a great dude).

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 7:58 pm
by everything_bagel
YeezusPiece wrote:Or is this just a waste of money? I'm a non-URM with average softs, LORs, and mediocre (probably below average) WE.
Aiming for Harvard rather than retaking for $$$ from other t-14's the real waste of money. Take a year off, do something awesome, and improve your LSAT if you can.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 8:00 pm
by Rigo
everything_bagel wrote:
YeezusPiece wrote:Or is this just a waste of money? I'm a non-URM with average softs, LORs, and mediocre (probably below average) WE.
Aiming for Harvard rather than retaking for $$$ from other t-14's the real waste of money. Take a year off, do something awesome, and improve your LSAT if you can.
*steals thunder* OP has exhausted his takes.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 8:10 pm
by everything_bagel
Dirigo wrote:
everything_bagel wrote:
YeezusPiece wrote:Or is this just a waste of money? I'm a non-URM with average softs, LORs, and mediocre (probably below average) WE.
Aiming for Harvard rather than retaking for $$$ from other t-14's the real waste of money. Take a year off, do something awesome, and improve your LSAT if you can.
*steals thunder* OP has exhausted his takes.
Lol sorry. You're doing it right, OP. Nothing to add then, bur dirigo is right: No harm in giving it a shot; it's a crazy cycle.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:29 am
by MattM
op hasn't "exhausted his takes"

Can have a 4th take as long is it is not the 4th LSAT in a 2 yr period

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:58 am
by Rigo
MattM wrote:op hasn't "exhausted his takes"

Can have a 4th take as long is it is not the 4th LSAT in a 2 yr period
Which is precisely why OP has exhausted his takes.
Are you suggesting OP wait until June 2016 to retake?
Don't disagree with what I said when you obviously don't know OP's specific situation.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:59 am
by ilikebaseball
how often does LSAC grant 4th takes upon appeal within the 2 year frame?

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 4:38 am
by musedreverie
ilikebaseball wrote:how often does LSAC grant 4th takes upon appeal within the 2 year frame?
Unless your exam building was hit by a tornado, I'd say very rarely; otherwise, everyone would be clamouring for the 4th retake and LSAC would have to hand them out like candies and then it kinda dilutes the whole concept of 3 takes in 2 year restriction.

And OP, I'd just give it a shot. Why not.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:19 pm
by MattM
Dirigo wrote:
MattM wrote:op hasn't "exhausted his takes"

Can have a 4th take as long is it is not the 4th LSAT in a 2 yr period
Which is precisely why OP has exhausted his takes.
Are you suggesting OP wait until June 2016 to retake?
Don't disagree with what I said when you obviously don't know OP's specific situation.
in a literal sense OP has not "exhausted his takes"....no true limit on # of takes although the less the better, ....He has only exhausted his takes within a 2 year period

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:21 pm
by Rigo
MattM wrote:
Dirigo wrote:
MattM wrote:op hasn't "exhausted his takes"
Can have a 4th take as long is it is not the 4th LSAT in a 2 yr period
Which is precisely why OP has exhausted his takes.
Are you suggesting OP wait until June 2016 to retake?
Don't disagree with what I said when you obviously don't know OP's specific situation.
in a literal sense OP has not "exhausted his takes"....no true limit on # of takes although the less the better, ....He has only exhausted his takes within a 2 year period
Just stop.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:52 pm
by downbeat14
.

Re: Is Harvard worth a shot this cycle with 3.7, 170?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 2:04 pm
by middlebear
YeezusPiece wrote:Or is this just a waste of money? I'm a non-URM with average softs, LORs, and mediocre (probably below average) WE.
Here are my thoughts, as someone who has the exact same stats: why the hell not? Like others said above, if you ever apply to HYS, this is probably going to be the best time to do it. I know I personally would rather send off hail mary apps than sit around and wonder if maybe I could have been in that lucky 5.8%. Who knows, you could be that special snowflakes that manages to make it, you never know.