Page 1 of 1

3.3;

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:07 am
by mpcrabby
First and foremost, thank you all in advance for your advice and time!

He

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:54 am
by gentlemanscholar
You're a splitter so it's tough to call, but that military service is one of the best softs out there.

You can check out LSN to get a rough idea, but the data is self reported so it is incomplete and subject to bias.

http://mylsn.info/u9v9dz/

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:38 am
by Chrstgtr
You won't get NU ED since all ED admits come with a full scholarship which makes competition far more difficult ED than RD. I wouldn't be surprised if you were admitted RD to NU with some money since you have really good softs and LSAT score.

Are you eligible for the GI bill? If you are I would send an app ED to NYU (or maybe Columbia) since you stand a chance of being admitted with your LSAT and your COA would be covered by GI. Otherwise I would send out apps RD and take whichever T14 eventually admits you (or school with the most appealing scholarship if you don't qualify for GI).

Also how did you graduate Summa when your GPA is only 3.3? Aren't latin honors determined by cum GPA?

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:03 am
by mpcrabby
Thanks for the replies and information!

Chrstgtr, I received latin honors because I took a 4 year break from college. Because of that, most universities in my state have "fresh start" programs for GPA/honor purposes so long as you attempt a given number of credit hours (can't "fresh start" and attempt 3 credit hours at a 4.0 and expect honors; in my case I had to complete at least 40 hours). So OVERALL my career GPA is not worthy of honors, but for the purposes of my degree and career at my second university, 57 credits at 4.0 gave me latin honors.

Thanks for your input!

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:24 am
by FSK
You should apply to Chicago and down and hope. App fees are small, and hard to predict where you're going to spike.

If you feel you can improve to 173+ on a retake, consider it. It'll help, but maybe not in the hyper-obvious way it does with most applicants, so I'm not going to absolutely suggest you do it.

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:31 am
by kcdc1
Based on admittedly weak evidence, I get the sense that Northwestern's admissions policy boils down to: "Do what it takes to have a 170 LSAT median."

You have a 171, so you will get in. You will most likely also be able to negotiate for decent $$.

Your softs are nice and should be discussed and sold in your personal statement, but don't get too cute. This is about numbers.

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:52 pm
by mpcrabby
I really appreciate everyone's input.

Any input on the possibility at WUSTL? Moreso, chances on any scholarships?

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:56 pm
by sundance95
You should UVA for Yellow Ribbon.

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:34 pm
by DecisionTime999
mpcrabby wrote:I really appreciate everyone's input.

Any input on the possibility at WUSTL? Moreso, chances on any scholarships?
You're a shoe-in at WUSTL but should aim higher IMO.

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:44 pm
by twenty
Chris already asked this, but are you GI Bill eligible?

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:47 pm
by TheSpanishMain
sundance95 wrote:You should UVA for Yellow Ribbon.
If he only has a year of active service, he's ineligible for the Yellow Ribbon Program. He'll still get some portion of the Post 9/11, probably like 50%, but you need 100% for Yellow Ribbon.

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 8:47 pm
by twenty
He'd also get 50% of in-state, right?

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 8:53 pm
by JamMasterJ
If one person without above median LSAT and GPA got the full ride at NU, it would be you. Might be worth it if you're willing to commit to them. Otherwise, I'd guess you probably get in at most of the bottom half of the T14 at least. You'll get a full ride at WUSTL, but you shouldn't take it because you will have good money at FAR better schools.

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:13 pm
by sundance95
TheSpanishMain wrote:
sundance95 wrote:You should UVA for Yellow Ribbon.
If he only has a year of active service, he's ineligible for the Yellow Ribbon Program. He'll still get some portion of the Post 9/11, probably like 50%, but you need 100% for Yellow Ribbon.
ah word

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:20 pm
by Ramius
twenty wrote:He'd also get 50% of in-state, right?
If it's one full year, he'll actually get 60% of in-state.

http://nvf.org/veterans-benefits/educat ... 11-gi-bill

Re: 3.3; 171; 9 years exp

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:11 pm
by jk148706
.