Page 1 of 2
168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:13 am
by kevin0201
LSAT: Cancel / 165 / Bombed June 2014 LSAT
GPA: 3.91 from an Ivy League school
Currently serving in the Army as an enlisted. Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
I'll have served for two years by the time I attend law school (which will count for work experience).
So the issue is, I panic when I see logic games. Weird, I know, but I can't help it. I got one more re-take left since my first test was in June 2012; so my understanding is, I'll be able to take again in October? However, preparing for the test while working full-time has been rough, and I don't know if raising my score is very likely. I do not wish to take another year off to study for the LSAT. I'm already behind of others by 2 years, due to my service.
Another issue I have is my parents. If I had a choice, I do not want to depend on them for law school, for various reasons. Schools that offer full tuition scholarship sound nice, but I know that my numbers aren't good enough to ED Northwestern, but good enough for EDing GWU.
Lower T-14 schools are an option, but loans will be a pain because I'm not an American citizen, and I will need a co-signer and a bunch of other things that aren't very fun to deal with.
Thanks for reading, and please comment freely about what I should do. ED a school that'll give me a good money but with worse job prospects? Or, go to a higher ranked school with a better chance for BigLaw, but pay a lot more fore it? And perhaps advice with LG?
Edit: June LSAT score for Asia just came out. 168 now.
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:31 am
by Ti Malice
You have a Yale-worthy GPA. Whether you take on $300K of debt at a T14 (ED to UVA) or give up on the T14 for a scholarship at a regional school, I think it would be tragic either way when all that's standing between you and YHS is LG.
What exactly have you done in studying for LG? How many times have you taken the LSAT? Maybe you could benefit from a few sessions with a private tutor on LG -- or something. I just have to think it's too early for you to throw in the towel.
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:47 am
by Big Dog
Thank you for your service.
Now get onto LG prep. Check out Manhattan's books, or Velocity. Don't waste that GPA when the LG are the easiest on which to improve. Improve 3+, and prosper.
Good luck.
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:21 am
by bjsesq
kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:49 am
by kevin0201
bjsesq wrote:kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:51 am
by bjsesq
kevin0201 wrote:bjsesq wrote:kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.
Ok. Ranger school would help in apps, PLDC not so much
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:25 am
by heythatslife
bjsesq wrote:kevin0201 wrote:bjsesq wrote:kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.
Ok. Ranger school would help in apps, PLDC not so much
Hmmm do most adcoms actually appreciate how much of a big deal Ranger School is compared to other random courses?
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:22 pm
by bjsesq
heythatslife wrote:Hmmm do most adcoms actually appreciate how much of a big deal Ranger School is compared to other random courses?
The title of Army Ranger helps, even if you aren't a batt boy. Mostly because people don't know the difference.
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:55 pm
by TheSpanishMain
Will you be Post 911 eligible? If so, consider EDing UVA for a full ride if you serve a full three years
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:16 pm
by kevin0201
Edit: 168!!! June score just came out (I'm stationed in Korea).
Now what?
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:16 pm
by kevin0201
TheSpanishMain wrote:Will you be Post 911 eligible? If so, consider EDing UVA for a full ride if you serve a full three years
Unfortunately, no...
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:25 pm
by Mullens
Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:18 pm
by kevin0201
Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:43 pm
by twenty
Typically you'd have very little chance of getting ED NU, but vets tend to outperform their numbers. Bummer you don't have the GI Bill though.
I'd ED to NU regardless and hope for the best.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:48 pm
by Ti Malice
kevin0201 wrote:Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...
Yes, you definitely have a chance at NU via ED. Here are some folks with 168s and lower GPAs that were accepted with a full ride this cycle:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MeowMix77
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jaredcal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Wildcats17
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:06 pm
by kevin0201
Yeah. I made the GPA range wider and found that 1 person out of 3 was accepted ED at NU.
Is the number small because I'm a reverse splitter?
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:07 pm
by kevin0201
I'm entertaining the idea of EDing NU and blanketing T14 and some more.
Yay or nay?
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:29 pm
by twenty
Blanket the T20. I'd be absolutely shocked if you didn't end up with at least one full ride.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:37 pm
by kevin0201
twenty wrote:Blanket the T20. I'd be absolutely shocked if you didn't end up with at least one full ride.
Thanks!
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:03 pm
by daleearnhardt123
The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:25 pm
by kevin0201
daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:34 pm
by daleearnhardt123
kevin0201 wrote:daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.
Here's a vet with pretty much identical #s (shade worse than yours really):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zbollenb
Unfortunately this person only applied to 3 schools and didn't post scholly amts. Nonetheless, I think this should demonstrate that EDing GW would be an awful choice.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:40 am
by kevin0201
daleearnhardt123 wrote:kevin0201 wrote:daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.
Here's a vet with pretty much identical #s (shade worse than yours really):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zbollenb
Unfortunately this person only applied to 3 schools and didn't post scholly amts. Nonetheless, I think this should demonstrate that EDing GW would be an awful choice.
Yeah not EDing GWU no more. I was so sure I bombed the June LSAT.
Thanks for so much useful information! Are you a vet yourself?
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:48 am
by winstonsalem
Here are some other profiles of vets,
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/r-t87
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/thedave29
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/twobitrye
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/goreman
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bahama
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/matthewsean85
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/SchusterFlook
By the way, I know of vets with LSATs around 167-168 who made it into H and Y as non-URMs. You should apply to literally all of the top 14, including Y, as your military credentials will be worth much more than half a point on the LSAT.
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:06 am
by daleearnhardt123
Responding again just to echo this. Law schools love vets. Good work ethics and you all outperform your #s at OCI regularly, which is great for the school's employment stats. Not a vet myself, just happen to know a good #.