Page 1 of 1

.

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:16 pm
by BerkeleyMan5
.

Re: 3.92 and 170 LSAT

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:59 pm
by arklaw13
BerkeleyMan5 wrote:What should I be expecting with my numbers? I already played around with LSN, but I'd prefer to hear some personalized wisdom from the TLS community.

Softs are slightly above average. Went to top 20 undergrad.
We really won't be able to tell you any more than LSN. tl;dr: you'll get in with $$ outside CCN, probably be in at CCN, and it's worth it to apply to HYS for shits and giggles.

Re: 3.92 and 170 LSAT

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:38 pm
by drevo
BerkeleyMan5 wrote: I already played around with LSN, but I'd prefer to hear some personalized wisdom from the TLS community.
myLSN is REAL aggregate data from past applicants. That makes it WAY better than just about anything anyone here can offer you from anecdotal evidence. Asking TLS is more helpful when there are other factors that LSN doesn't have good data on like URM or super splitters. Just letting you know that nobody's response here is really going to be better than LSN.

That said you have very good numbers and will probably have a great cycle. I'm sure a person or two will ask if you are willing to retake and sit out a cycle to try and get a solid chance at HYS or CCN with serious $$$. That remains up to you as a 170 isn't exactly a slouch of an LSAT! Good luck!

.

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:45 pm
by BerkeleyMan5
.

.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:55 am
by BerkeleyMan5
.

Re: 3.92 and 170 LSAT

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:26 pm
by twelveoaks
I had similar stats as you - high GPA at T15 and slightly lower than avg LSAT for HYS. Assuming you didn't bomb your PS, you'll do great. I didn't get in everywhere, but I also can say I didn't get rejected from a single school. Waitlisted at Y and S, in at H. In everywhere else I applied, including 3 T10 schools with $ worth 1 year of tuition.

It's a bit late in the cycle if you only just applied, but if you applied a month or two ago, you're golden! Good luck!