Page 1 of 1

170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:11 pm
by somuchwaiting
During the dreaded admission wait, I decided I'd see what you TLSers thought.

170 on LSAT, 3.8 GPA.

Chances at T-14? Thanks!

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:18 pm
by BigZuck
I know it feels like they do or should but none of those softs matter

Plug your numbers into mylsn.info and see what it says. Those are your chances.

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:18 pm
by SteelPenguin
Out at HYS, strong chance at Columbia/Chicago, in at the rest.

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:21 pm
by somuchwaiting
Thanks guys!

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:25 pm
by Carter1901
OP, I've got virtually identical numbers and am also interested in JAG - very cool. Most of the research I've done suggests SteelPenguin's assessment is spot on. Best of luck to you, looking forward to seeing how our cycles go.

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:29 pm
by somuchwaiting
Absolutely. Good luck to you as well!

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:44 pm
by dnptan
Numbers twin (for my last cycle).

WL H; In CCN below. Hope this helps.

Good Softs: Founded a startup; double major (Biomed Eng/Biology); Work at IP consulting; Bilingual
Bad Softs: Applied at deadline; International Student (Went to US Univ)

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:54 pm
by jbagelboy
dnptan wrote:Numbers twin (for my last cycle).

WL H; In CCN below. Hope this helps.

Good Softs: Founded a startup; double major (Biomed Eng/Biology); Work at IP consulting; Bilingual
Bad Softs: Applied at deadline; International Student (Went to US Univ)
I thought you were WL at CC. I only make this point because a 170/3.8 should not expect CLS or Chicago.

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:59 pm
by dnptan
jbagelboy wrote:
dnptan wrote:Numbers twin (for my last cycle).

WL H; In CCN below. Hope this helps.

Good Softs: Founded a startup; double major (Biomed Eng/Biology); Work at IP consulting; Bilingual
Bad Softs: Applied at deadline; International Student (Went to US Univ)
I thought you were WL at CC. I only make this point because a 170/3.8 should not expect CLS or Chicago.
Yep WL-->in, just thought I'd simplify it. Also for Chicago, WL-->withdraw, and NYU is straight in. Just FYI

Also H-->WL-->out

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:21 pm
by jbagelboy
dnptan wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
dnptan wrote:Numbers twin (for my last cycle).

WL H; In CCN below. Hope this helps.

Good Softs: Founded a startup; double major (Biomed Eng/Biology); Work at IP consulting; Bilingual
Bad Softs: Applied at deadline; International Student (Went to US Univ)
I thought you were WL at CC. I only make this point because a 170/3.8 should not expect CLS or Chicago.
Yep WL-->in, just thought I'd simplify it. Also for Chicago, WL-->withdraw, and NYU is straight in. Just FYI

Also H-->WL-->out
Cool, thank you for the clarifications.

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:02 am
by hcrimson2014
dnptan wrote:Numbers twin (for my last cycle).

WL H; In CCN below. Hope this helps.

Good Softs: Founded a startup; double major (Biomed Eng/Biology); Work at IP consulting; Bilingual
Bad Softs: Applied at deadline; International Student (Went to US Univ)
Why do you think international students going to a US university is necessarily a negative?

Re: 170/3.8

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:41 am
by dnptan
hcrimson2014 wrote:
dnptan wrote:Numbers twin (for my last cycle).

WL H; In CCN below. Hope this helps.

Good Softs: Founded a startup; double major (Biomed Eng/Biology); Work at IP consulting; Bilingual
Bad Softs: Applied at deadline; International Student (Went to US Univ)
Why do you think international students going to a US university is necessarily a negative?
Oops. To clarify, being an international student is the negative, but having a US degree mitigates that slightly. International acceptance is lower in a good number of schools. For instance, Boalt accepted 0 internationals in 2009 (Page 3, Column 1):

http://www.powerscore.com/lawschool/gui ... Boalt).pdf