3.4, 175 3rd take Forum
- moopness
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm
3.4, 175 3rd take
DEleted
Last edited by moopness on Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: 3.4, 175 3rd take
I would do one of two things if I were you:
1. ED NYU, very likely get in.
2. Apply RD to Columbia, NYU, and the lower T14, potentially getting money to one of them.
1. ED NYU, very likely get in.
2. Apply RD to Columbia, NYU, and the lower T14, potentially getting money to one of them.
- moopness
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: 3.4, 175 3rd take
I feel like if I ED Columbia I will prob just get waitlisted, but I do prefer Columbia to NYU. And if I RD everywhere I can totally see myself getting waitlisted or rejected throughout the top 10 and have to settle for DCNG. But If I ED to NYU it seems like I have a pretty good shot...I've just have my heart set on Columbia for the longest time T_T
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 2:21 am
Re: 3.4, 175 3rd take
http://admissionsbythenumbers.blogspot. ... ofile.html
EDing Columbia and NYU don't provide statistically significant boosts. Don't waste it, because there is a possibility you wrangle a little scholly money; just RD early. You've got a pretty good shot at both Columbia or NYU, and your LSAT should make you a reasonably competitive splitter this cycle, since CCN will be hungry to keep their LSATs up. Apply H and CCNP down, but if you don't get in (or WL->get in) at any of HCCNP, I'd be *very* surprised. Even with the last 2 cycles' stats (which this cycle should be better than), your chance of not getting into any of HCCNP would be:
http://myLSN.info/vwywvh_1-14.jpg
.80 * .50 * .17 * .83 = 5.64%, not counting any waitlists. With waitlists, you're close to 100%. This is aggregate over the last two cycles, so this cycle, you're probably close to a lock for getting one of these schools.
GL this cycle.
EDing Columbia and NYU don't provide statistically significant boosts. Don't waste it, because there is a possibility you wrangle a little scholly money; just RD early. You've got a pretty good shot at both Columbia or NYU, and your LSAT should make you a reasonably competitive splitter this cycle, since CCN will be hungry to keep their LSATs up. Apply H and CCNP down, but if you don't get in (or WL->get in) at any of HCCNP, I'd be *very* surprised. Even with the last 2 cycles' stats (which this cycle should be better than), your chance of not getting into any of HCCNP would be:
http://myLSN.info/vwywvh_1-14.jpg
.80 * .50 * .17 * .83 = 5.64%, not counting any waitlists. With waitlists, you're close to 100%. This is aggregate over the last two cycles, so this cycle, you're probably close to a lock for getting one of these schools.
GL this cycle.
- moopness
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: 3.4, 175 3rd take
Thank you! I appreciate the help, this puts my mind more at ease.dongdong wrote:http://admissionsbythenumbers.blogspot. ... ofile.html
EDing Columbia and NYU don't provide statistically significant boosts. Don't waste it, because there is a possibility you wrangle a little scholly money; just RD early. You've got a pretty good shot at both Columbia or NYU, and your LSAT should make you a reasonably competitive splitter this cycle, since CCN will be hungry to keep their LSATs up. Apply H and CCNP down, but if you don't get in (or WL->get in) at any of HCCNP, I'd be *very* surprised. Even with the last 2 cycles' stats (which this cycle should be better than), your chance of not getting into any of HCCNP would be:
http://myLSN.info/vwywvh_1-14.jpg
.80 * .50 * .17 * .83 = 5.64%, not counting any waitlists. With waitlists, you're close to 100%. This is aggregate over the last two cycles, so this cycle, you're probably close to a lock for getting one of these schools.
GL this cycle.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login