Page 1 of 1
3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:25 pm
by Rainy
Thanks for the help guys.
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:28 pm
by thewaves
Shoot for HYS, you're a lock for CCN
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:30 pm
by Rainy
Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:38 pm
by Dr.Zer0
.
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:39 pm
by ManoftheHour
Rainy wrote:Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?
Softs, LOR, resumes are TTT.
Enjoy CCN.
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:40 pm
by SupCutie
Rainy wrote:Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?
Dude... 175. Drop the mic and enjoy T6.
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:52 pm
by Rainy
Thanks for the help so far guys - it's much appreciated and I'm feeling a lot better. One final question and I'll leave you all alone and fly majestically into the sunset. How much of a boost does applying ED to Columbia give me? I'd rather go to Stanford, but I don't want to waste my ED opportunity and I'm not sure my chances at the former (as a note I have 3 close family members - sister/parents - who attended Stanford UG, although I doubt admissions gives a rat's ass). Thoughts?
Once again, thank you so much for your time.
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:06 pm
by MoMettaMonk
Rainy wrote:Thanks for the help so far guys - it's much appreciated and I'm feeling a lot better. One final question and I'll leave you all alone and fly majestically into the sunset. How much of a boost does applying ED to Columbia give me? I'd rather go to Stanford, but I don't want to waste my ED opportunity and I'm not sure my chances at the former (as a note I have 3 close family members - sister/parents - who attended Stanford UG, although I doubt admissions gives a rat's ass). Thoughts?
Once again, thank you so much for your time.
http://www.admissionsbythenumbers.com/
From what we can tell, EDing to Columbia provides no boost, or a boost so small as to not be statistically significant. Generally speaking, a candidate like you EDing is awesome for Columbia, and a pretty bad deal for you.