Can you even get into HYS with a 3.6?
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:47 pm
Is it even possible without being a URM (I think I am one though)?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=211592
A non-URM would have a non-zero chance with a 175+ LSAT and a great application.Xixak wrote:Is it even possible without being a URM (I think I am one though)?
So I would basically need to annihilate the LSAT then?jbagelboy wrote:YS no, but apparently Harvard has accepted a few 3.6ish candidates with above 75th LSATs (176 and up)
Yea; if you're black tho (as another poster suggested), then you are probably in w/ a 170. Just make sure they know your race.Xixak wrote:So I would basically need to annihilate the LSAT then?jbagelboy wrote:YS no, but apparently Harvard has accepted a few 3.6ish candidates with above 75th LSATs (176 and up)
Might as well start studying now and become an expert on the test, not taking it till this time next year.
Lowest 3 non-URMs at Stanford this cycle according to LSN:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jimbo89 (3.53/172) (This guy has had a dream cycle)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/usafgirl (3.56/176) (Ivy undergrad/4 years of active military service)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/iVinshe (3.6/172) (Me)
Then there's a big jump, and the next lowest GPA is a 3.73.
Lowest 3 non-URMs at Harvard this cycle according to LSN:
<The first two above; sensing a trend?>
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/mm3456 (3.59/174) (Is this GeneralMuffin?)
Lowest 3 non-URMs at Yale this cycle according to LSN:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zdc (3.73/174) (HYP undergrad; Asian)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Elwood (3.78/178) (3 years of work experience)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/je12345 (3.83/174) (Few years of consulting experience; what look to be great softs)
Jealous...cinephile wrote:I know a non-URM with a 3.5 and 177 who got in this year. So yes, it's certainly possible.
yes. it is an affirmative action policy for law schools stemming from this decisionlaww wrote:Is URM related to affirmative action?
I heard there's going to be decision on that soon on the radio on my way to the train station today.