. Forum
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Law school predictor isn't going to reliably predict your cycle because you are a splitter.
There is a thread on here somewhere about which schools are more "splitter-friendly" since a lot of schools have hard GPA floors, most of which are above 3.1. You should get some T-14 acceptances with a 175, though.
There is a thread on here somewhere about which schools are more "splitter-friendly" since a lot of schools have hard GPA floors, most of which are above 3.1. You should get some T-14 acceptances with a 175, though.
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Here's a useful link: http://myLSN.info/zl6ak3racrfish wrote:Hey y'all-- before I got my score I was planning to apply to Duke, UNC, Wake Forest, Campbell, and some other local schools, with my hopes set on UNC. Now that my score turned out to be way better than I anticipated, I'm wondering where else I should apply, and what my chances are with Duke and UNC. I think I'm set when it comes to WF, though.
I'd like to stick to the east coast. I'm looking at the law school predictor and looks like the only T14 with a "strong consider" is Cornell. Duke is listed as "weak consider."
Any thoughts?
As said, 175 LSAT, 3.3 UG GPA, and 3.1 LSAC GPA.
Thank you!!
(And as a lurker on the Dec waiting thread, thanks for getting me through the month! )
You should get some T14 acceptances, but the relatively late application might hurt you and you'll probably have to ride out some waitlists--good news is that schools want your LSAT. If you don't get what you want, I'd reapply early next cycle.
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
You should probably ED to UVA. Otherwise, you will ride multiple waitlists at NYU, Penn and Michigan. You have a good shot at Georgetown and Northwestern as well.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
.
Last edited by racrfish on Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Get Vanderbilt on that list. And write a Why UNC if you're seriously considering going there. Seems like they yield protect people with your numbers. Really, though, you'll probably get $ or $$ from the one or two T14's if you ride the waitlists until the end.racrfish wrote:(And my list is now Duke, UNC, WF, UVA, W&M, Michigan, Penn, Northwestern, and Georgetown.)
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
"yield protect?"
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Not accepting you because they dont think youll matriculate.racrfish wrote:"yield protect?"
Applicants who dont matriculate hurt their selectivity rating, which affects rankings.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
When you have numbers that make it clear to a lower ranked school that you'll likely be accepted to much fancier schools, they'll be wary of admitting you. For every offer they make that doesn't result in a matriculation, the school takes a hit in the USNWR formula. A Why X statement will make them think there's a chance you'll actually go there.racrfish wrote:"yield protect?"
SCOOPED BY NOVA, DGAF.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Which is because you'll get into the T14. You're practically auto-admit at G-town, as is almost everyone else with a 170+.Nova wrote:Not accepting you because they dont think youll matriculate.racrfish wrote:"yield protect?"
If you're shooting lower than T14, you'd better be getting some $$$.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
.
Last edited by racrfish on Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Whoa, whoa. Don't go that far. You're looking at money from the T14. Tell them why you're legitimately interested in their school, nothing more.racrfish wrote:So basically, make it very clear in my "Why UNC" that I'd matriculate there if they accept me. Cool.
You have great numbers, dude. Don't undersell yourself here.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
.
Last edited by racrfish on Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
There's not a lot of data for UNC with your numbers since heavy splitters typically target the T14. It looks like you'll get in, but I wonder if you'll receive enough $$$ to make it worthwhile.
GULC looks like a good bet but I would strongly consider EDing UVA with your #'s since it sounds like you want to be in the south
GULC looks like a good bet but I would strongly consider EDing UVA with your #'s since it sounds like you want to be in the south
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
This. It's what I did. Wanted to suggest it but didn't want it to seem like I was pushing my own risky decisions on others.ChampagnePapi wrote:There's not a lot of data for UNC with your numbers since heavy splitters typically target the T14. It looks like you'll get in, but I wonder if you'll receive enough $$$ to make it worthwhile.
GULC looks like a good bet but I would strongly consider EDing UVA with your #'s since it sounds like you want to be in the south
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
"Why X" essays aren't binding, bro. Say whatever you need to say to get that acceptance.North wrote:Whoa, whoa. Don't go that far. You're looking at money from the T14. Tell them why you're legitimately interested in their school, nothing more.racrfish wrote:So basically, make it very clear in my "Why UNC" that I'd matriculate there if they accept me. Cool.
You have great numbers, dude. Don't undersell yourself here.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Not sure if SRS BSNS.francesfarmer wrote:"Why X" essays aren't binding, bro. Say whatever you need to say to get that acceptance.
Just in case: law schools aren't big on lying and "I'd matriculate if accepted" doesn't offer much wiggle room for OP.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
.
Last edited by racrfish on Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Then maybe he should say "I would love to attend" instead of "I will attend." Then he won't be lying.North wrote:Not sure if SRS BSNS.francesfarmer wrote:"Why X" essays aren't binding, bro. Say whatever you need to say to get that acceptance.
Just in case: law schools aren't big on lying and "I'd matriculate if accepted" doesn't offer much wiggle room for OP.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 175, 3.3 UG, 3.1 LSAC
Yeah, exactly.francesfarmer wrote:Then maybe he should say "I would love to attend" instead of "I will attend." Then he won't be lying.North wrote:Not sure if SRS BSNS.francesfarmer wrote:"Why X" essays aren't binding, bro. Say whatever you need to say to get that acceptance.
Just in case: law schools aren't big on lying and "I'd matriculate if accepted" doesn't offer much wiggle room for OP.
Huh, this thread was from a while ago. Thanks for coming back to round off the conversation, .
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login