Page 1 of 1

CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:05 am
by bobbyflayed
Snowball's chance in hell?

cancel/164/171

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:41 pm
by Liquox
yes, take a shot

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:43 pm
by JWalker
Not impossible, but VERY unlikely. You'll probably get deferred.

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:44 pm
by Br3v
I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:54 pm
by JWalker
Br3v wrote:I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?
It's possible but I think the GPA is a bit low. From a personal standpoint I didn't get Columbia ED with a 172/3.8, but then again I had absolutely no softs or WE.

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:55 pm
by Ruxin1
Br3v wrote:I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?
Below both medians

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:33 pm
by iMisto
Ruxin1 wrote:
Br3v wrote:I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?
Below both medians
... but certainly they need SOMEBODY to pay sticker, no?

Seems to me OP would have a reasonable shot. GPA is a bit low, but LSAT isn't that far off. Plus, who knows what the new medians are going to look like. :?:

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:42 pm
by CaliforniaBear
What if he has 172 instead of 171?
Does he now have a decent shot at CLS ED?

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:52 pm
by Br3v
JWalker wrote:
Br3v wrote:I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?
It's possible but I think the GPA is a bit low. From a personal standpoint I didn't get Columbia ED with a 172/3.8, but then again I had absolutely no softs or WE.
wow

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:50 pm
by JWalker
Br3v wrote:
JWalker wrote:
Br3v wrote:I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?
It's possible but I think the GPA is a bit low. From a personal standpoint I didn't get Columbia ED with a 172/3.8, but then again I had absolutely no softs or WE.
wow
TBF most people with my numbers get into Columbia and a lot of people with worse numbers than me got in last cycle too so I guess I was a bit negative and OP has a pretty solid chance. My application was definitely an exception, not the rule.

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:26 pm
by Br3v
JWalker wrote:
Br3v wrote:
JWalker wrote:
Br3v wrote:I was under the impression OP has a reasonable shot?
It's possible but I think the GPA is a bit low. From a personal standpoint I didn't get Columbia ED with a 172/3.8, but then again I had absolutely no softs or WE.
wow
TBF most people with my numbers get into Columbia and a lot of people with worse numbers than me got in last cycle too so I guess I was a bit negative and OP has a pretty solid chance. My application was definitely an exception, not the rule.
Any guess why? Where did you end up?

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:19 am
by JWalker
Br3v wrote:
JWalker wrote:
TBF most people with my numbers get into Columbia and a lot of people with worse numbers than me got in last cycle too so I guess I was a bit negative and OP has a pretty solid chance. My application was definitely an exception, not the rule.
Any guess why? Where did you end up?
I'm at NYU right now and I love it here so it's all good.

As for Columbia, my application was seriously rushed. Basically I started writing my essays after I got my October LSAT score and sent in my apps just a week or two later, so they were presumably awful. While NYU is well-known for accepting virtually anyone with LSAT/GPA numbers in their range, I guess Columbia is a bit more picky and didn't like the application as a whole.

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:13 pm
by bobbyflayed
I'm split between Eding Columbia (for the slight chance that I may get in) or Eding NYU/Penn.

Even between NYU and Penn the decision is difficult. They seem to be pretty much peers for placement but NYU will cost at least 30k more for living expenses. Coming from the west coast (and hoping to go back) living in manhattan would be amazing for 3 years though.

As far as WE goes, I worked at a small start up for a while but I should be moving into a clerking position at a 300+ lawyer boutique IP litigation firm this next week.

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:39 pm
by iMisto
NYU's LSAT median dropped to 171.

ED Columbia.

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:00 pm
by indigomachine
iMisto wrote:NYU's LSAT median dropped to 171.

ED Columbia.
I'd ED CLS if you have no preference between CLS and NYU (or if you prefer CLS).

Technicality here, but do we have anything actually confirming that the median for c/o 2015 is 171? I'm pretty sure you're right, but we haven't gotten anything official (at least not at orientation).

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:33 am
by iMisto
I thought it had been discussed in Medians thread - Choosing A Law School.

I would do either NYU/CLS, but OP asked about CLS...

Re: CLS? 3.62/171? Worth an ED?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:58 pm
by Br3v
JWalker wrote:
Br3v wrote:
JWalker wrote:
TBF most people with my numbers get into Columbia and a lot of people with worse numbers than me got in last cycle too so I guess I was a bit negative and OP has a pretty solid chance. My application was definitely an exception, not the rule.
Any guess why? Where did you end up?
I'm at NYU right now and I love it here so it's all good.

As for Columbia, my application was seriously rushed. Basically I started writing my essays after I got my October LSAT score and sent in my apps just a week or two later, so they were presumably awful. While NYU is well-known for accepting virtually anyone with LSAT/GPA numbers in their range, I guess Columbia is a bit more picky and didn't like the application as a whole.
Here I am feeling bad for you and you are sitting pretty at NYU. Glad that worked out for you man!