'
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:32 pm
'
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=188321
I was going to comment, but this is almost exactly what I would have written. I also had a difficult job that took up a lot of time and made studying/taking the test hard. Doesn't matter. If you work 12-14 hours a day, then it's time to start working 15-17 a day. It's a couple months of your life that will have huge ramifications on both the next three years and then your options after that. Just bear down and get it done.catholicgirl wrote:Similar numbers. I covered a lot of the T-14 minus HYS and did not ED anywhere. In at UVA and Chicago, dinged at NYU, waitlisted and withdrew from Duke and Northwestern.
From what I've heard around TLS, UVA is more reverse splitter friendly. But honestly, had I known what I know now, I would have retaken the test in October. I discovered TLS much too late.
And honestly, it's hard. It's hard to look at a score that's in the 92nd or 93rd percentile and say to yourself, "It's not good enough." Unfortunately, I wasn't in a position emotionally to retake. Looking at my score now makes me cringe. I missed two on LG, two on RC, and then the rest on LR. Had I spent even a few months just kicking ass on LR I could have easily cracked the 170s.dixon02 wrote:I was going to comment, but this is almost exactly what I would have written. I also had a difficult job that took up a lot of time and made studying/taking the test hard. Doesn't matter. If you work 12-14 hours a day, then it's time to start working 15-17 a day. It's a couple months of your life that will have huge ramifications on both the next three years and then your options after that. Just bear down and get it done.catholicgirl wrote:Similar numbers. I covered a lot of the T-14 minus HYS and did not ED anywhere. In at UVA and Chicago, dinged at NYU, waitlisted and withdrew from Duke and Northwestern.
From what I've heard around TLS, UVA is more reverse splitter friendly. But honestly, had I known what I know now, I would have retaken the test in October. I discovered TLS much too late.
Honestly, I would just retake in October and kill it. Don't make it this complicated :-pRegulus wrote:Ugh... you all have talked me into it. I think I might man up and retake the blasted test and apply for real next cycle. (I am going to probably wait until February so that I can ensure that I have ample time to reach the mid-170s...)
Just a quick question: Other than $$, is there any reason NOT to apply this cycle (without using ED) just to test the waters? I know LoRs and stuff hold for a couple of years, but are applicants allowed to apply to the exact same schools with the exact same LoRs, PS, etc., but just a different LSAT score? If the number of times you apply to a school with the same application isn't looked down upon, I see no reason why I shouldn't at least give this cycle a shot.