Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=181309
Geetar Man wrote:Seriously, dude. If you can retake and bump your lsat to a 170 +, Pepperdine won't be in your scope of schools to attend.
T14 or bust with that GPA.
Uh oh...now youve done it...ejs04100 wrote:I think I've pretty much maxed out on my LSAT...and Pepperdine has the best JD/MDR Program in the country which is why I'm considering it.
How many times and how did you study? Also, dual degree virtually useless.ejs04100 wrote:I think I've pretty much maxed out on my LSAT...and Pepperdine has the best JD/MDR Program in the country which is why I'm considering it.
How many full, timed practice tests did you take?ejs04100 wrote:I've only taken my LSAT once, but I studied using practice tests, Princeton Review books, and a prep course. I had been averaging 156 on prep tests, so I was pretty happy with a 160. I realize I'm a "reverse-splitter" but I never had my heart set on a T-14. @Spleenworship, why do you say that dual degrees are virtually worthless?
Thanks @Geeter Man! I'm going to visit this summer, but Pepperdine has everything I'm looking for. I appreciate your response!Geetar Man wrote:You're pretty much in, assuming there is nothing else that would bar you from attending:
http://pepperdine.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats
BUT, I think that if you're set on Pepperdine, you'll benefit in the form of CASHMONEYZ by retaking your LSAT.
Either way, enjoy Pepperdine.
MachineLemon wrote:How many full, timed practice tests did you take?ejs04100 wrote:I've only taken my LSAT once, but I studied using practice tests, Princeton Review books, and a prep course. I had been averaging 156 on prep tests, so I was pretty happy with a 160. I realize I'm a "reverse-splitter" but I never had my heart set on a T-14. @Spleenworship, why do you say that dual degrees are virtually worthless?
Yeah, that was my weakness. I was able to really perfect it. Consensus says that the games (aka analytical reasoning) are the easiest to improve. That doesn't mean it's easy, haha, just easier than improving reading or arguments.ejs04100 wrote:MachineLemon wrote:How many full, timed practice tests did you take?ejs04100 wrote:I've only taken my LSAT once, but I studied using practice tests, Princeton Review books, and a prep course. I had been averaging 156 on prep tests, so I was pretty happy with a 160. I realize I'm a "reverse-splitter" but I never had my heart set on a T-14. @Spleenworship, why do you say that dual degrees are virtually worthless?
10-15. The analytical reasoning was my downfall unfortunately.
No problem!ejs04100 wrote: Thanks @Geeter Man! I'm going to visit this summer, but Pepperdine has everything I'm looking for. I appreciate your response!
This, dude. What was your breakdown, by section, on your LSAT? Meaning, how many questions did you miss per section? If the number is high for logic games (analytic reasoning), then you need to retake. For it is believed and demonstrated all over the place that this section is the easiest (for most people) to improve on.ejs04100 wrote: 10-15. The analytical reasoning was my downfall unfortunately.
1. Powerscore logic games bibleejs04100 wrote:I've only taken my LSAT once, but I studied using practice tests, Princeton Review books, and a prep course. I had been averaging 156 on prep tests, so I was pretty happy with a 160. I realize I'm a "reverse-splitter" but I never had my heart set on a T-14. @Spleenworship, why do you say that dual degrees are virtually worthless?
@Geeter Man: I actually don't know what my breakdown was on my LSAT because I took the undisclosed February exam. However, on my practice tests I definitely missed the most questions on the logic games section. Do you know how dual-programs generally work, as far as tuition goes? I know at Pepperdine the MDR is approximately 18 more credits so I was under the impression that I'd just have to pay for the additional 18 credits. Thoughts? Thanks again for responding; you have been a big help!Geetar Man wrote:No problem!ejs04100 wrote: Thanks @Geeter Man! I'm going to visit this summer, but Pepperdine has everything I'm looking for. I appreciate your response!
This, dude. What was your breakdown, by section, on your LSAT? Meaning, how many questions did you miss per section? If the number is high for logic games (analytic reasoning), then you need to retake. For it is believed and demonstrated all over the place that this section is the easiest (for most people) to improve on.ejs04100 wrote: 10-15. The analytical reasoning was my downfall unfortunately.
Depending on how many you missed, it could make the difference between Pepperdine @ full-tuition vs. Pepperdine for less than half-tuition.
I'm sorry, I know its not the advice that you want to hear. But since you're wanting to do the dual-program, I think it's in your best interest to get law school at the lowest price.
With that 3.98, you've demonstrated that you're capable and willing, so you have one more task before law school and thats to be willing to max out your potential on the LSAT, especially if you missed a lot in the logic games section.
Thanks for taking the time to respond!spleenworship wrote:1. Powerscore logic games bibleejs04100 wrote:I've only taken my LSAT once, but I studied using practice tests, Princeton Review books, and a prep course. I had been averaging 156 on prep tests, so I was pretty happy with a 160. I realize I'm a "reverse-splitter" but I never had my heart set on a T-14. @Spleenworship, why do you say that dual degrees are virtually worthless?
2. 20 more practice tests
3. Retake. Go to t14 with $$$ to double or triple your chances of a good job.
4. Dual degrees are usually worthless because they cost more, take more time, don't significantly impact your employment chances or options, and you can realistically only do one thing at a time (ask an MD/JD at a med mal firm the last time they saw a patient- sure they use their medical knowledge, but not in any way that the average JD couldn't learn, and they aren't really practicing medicine... They are practicing law. It is the same with all of them...even your MDR isn't anything the average JD wouldn't learn in ADR classes that they actually needed).