Page 1 of 1
3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:17 am
by CourtneyJoann
Hey! I'm a political Science and Psychology double major. I hold a leadership position in my service fraternity, and I volunteer for over 200 hours a semester, placing an emphasis on sober driving and aiding victims of domestic/sexual abuse. What do you think my chances are at $ and admissions to a top tier? Should I retake the LSAT and try to score higher? 169 was my score with less than a month to prepare, and I didn't prepare very thoroughly.
Thanks!
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:22 am
by lawyerwannabe
CourtneyJoann wrote:Hey! I'm a political Science and Psychology double major. I hold a leadership position in my service fraternity, and I volunteer for over 200 hours a semester, placing an emphasis on sober driving and aiding victims of domestic/sexual abuse. What do you think my chances are at $ and admissions to a top tier? Should I retake the LSAT and try to score higher? 169 was my score with less than a month to prepare, and I didn't prepare very thoroughly.
Thanks!
Why not retake?
You are probably looking at a lower T14 acceptance with little to no money as you currently stand. If you could get a 173+, then you could be looking at a HYS acceptance and some money from CCN and some big money from the rest of T14. HTH.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:29 am
by KingsBench
You're facing the 169-170 barrier for most top schools, and given that you didn't really put in the effort you could have, retake is TCR. Don't waste that GPA on that LSAT!
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:38 am
by slsplease
If you look at Law School Numbers for schools like NYU, Michigan, etc. there seems to be more acceptances than waitlists and almost no rejections at the 3.9+, 169 data point. Maybe 3.89 is just below that cusp but doesn't the data seem to suggest that if OP were to blanked the T14 he'd get acceptances from at least a handful?
Interested b/c my numbers are 3.92 and wouldn't be surprised if my LSAT is a 169.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:42 am
by Samara
slsplease wrote:If you look at Law School Numbers for schools like NYU, Michigan, etc. there seems to be more acceptances than waitlists and almost no rejections at the 3.9+, 169 data point. Maybe 3.89 is just below that cusp but doesn't the data seem to suggest that if OP were to blanked the T14 he'd get acceptances from at least a handful?
Interested b/c my numbers are 3.92 and wouldn't be surprised if my LSAT is a 169.
That may be, but OP admitted to not preparing well for the LSAT. If OP retakes and score just a few points higher, you're looking at YSH or T6 with big money, possibly even a full ride. Why would you settle for T14 at sticker?
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:06 am
by Br3v
FOr sure, RETAKE.
You can still get into a great t14 school, but raising your LSAT could mean Harvard/Yale/Stanford.
And the frat this is pretty irrelevant, only thing besides LSAT and gpa that may noticeably help is work experience. Though I applaud what you are aiming to accomplish through the programs.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:44 am
by bigeast03
3.95/169 here. You can see how my cycle played out:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MockTurtle
I ended up getting good sized scholarships at Cornell and Vanderbilt, but getting waitlisted almost everywhere else. If you have the option of re-taking, I would definitely capitalize on that (depending on your goals).
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:49 am
by woeisme
bigeast03 wrote:3.95/169 here. You can see how my cycle played out:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MockTurtle
I ended up getting good sized scholarships at Cornell and Vanderbilt, but getting waitlisted almost everywhere else. If you have the option of re-taking, I would definitely capitalize on that (depending on your goals).
Whoa, Vandy over Cornell at same price? And you're from NY?? Really don't like Ithaca, huh? lol.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:53 am
by FloridaCoastalorbust
Basically numbers twin. I'm different in that I was ED, but everyone within this band did generally the same this year in regards to:
45k Mich
60k UVA
WL Penn
WL NYU
WL UChi
??? Stanford
You should definitely retake. It appears that those with 170s rather than 169s (within this band of GPA) received 105k rather than 60k at UVA. One more question right could mean 45k. Two more questions and you'd be 50/50for H (for this cycle, and assuming next cycle is just as lax or more lax). Considering schools won't care if you score lower, you'd be absolutely insane not to retake. Best of luck.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:05 pm
by bigeast03
woeisme wrote:bigeast03 wrote:3.95/169 here. You can see how my cycle played out:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MockTurtle
I ended up getting good sized scholarships at Cornell and Vanderbilt, but getting waitlisted almost everywhere else. If you have the option of re-taking, I would definitely capitalize on that (depending on your goals).
Whoa, Vandy over Cornell at same price? And you're from NY?? Really don't like Ithaca, huh? lol.
Yeah, it was definitely a tough choice. It was probably not advisable, but there were other circumstances that played into it. I would be willing to PM if anyone cared.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:33 pm
by woeisme
bigeast03 wrote:
Yeah, it was definitely a tough choice. It was probably not advisable, but there were other circumstances that played into it. I would be willing to PM if anyone cared.
I mean, I'm nosy and curious... but it's also none of my business.

Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:46 pm
by slsplease
FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:Basically numbers twin. I'm different in that I was ED, but everyone within this band did generally the same this year in regards to:
45k Mich
60k UVA
WL Penn
WL NYU
WL UChi
??? Stanford
You should definitely retake. It appears that those with 170s rather than 169s (within this band of GPA) received 105k rather than 60k at UVA. One more question right could mean 45k. Two more questions and you'd be 50/50for H (for this cycle, and assuming next cycle is just as lax or more lax). Considering schools won't care if you score lower, you'd be absolutely insane not to retake. Best of luck.
I'm surprised you got $$ from UMich whereas bigeast03 didn't even make it in. Good resume/softs? Honestly I'd be so happy with 45k at Michigan.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:50 pm
by charliep
bigeast03 wrote:3.95/169 here. You can see how my cycle played out:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MockTurtle
I ended up getting good sized scholarships at Cornell and Vanderbilt, but getting waitlisted almost everywhere else. If you have the option of re-taking, I would definitely capitalize on that (depending on your goals).
same. retake
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:46 pm
by CourtneyJoann
Thanks guys! I've decided to definitely retake. I just got a job as a Princeton Review LSAT prep instructor, so I'm hoping my score will increase now that I'll actually be studying more.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:55 pm
by Samara
CourtneyJoann wrote:Thanks guys! I've decided to definitely retake. I just got a job as a Princeton Review LSAT prep instructor, so I'm hoping my score will increase now that I'll actually be studying more.
Another soul saved. Thanks be to Ken.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:02 pm
by bigeast03
Samara wrote:CourtneyJoann wrote:Thanks guys! I've decided to definitely retake. I just got a job as a Princeton Review LSAT prep instructor, so I'm hoping my score will increase now that I'll actually be studying more.
Another soul saved. Thanks be to Ken.
This.
Good luck, I'm sure you'll kill the LSAT!
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:04 pm
by Dany
slsplease wrote:FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:Basically numbers twin. I'm different in that I was ED, but everyone within this band did generally the same this year in regards to:
45k Mich
60k UVA
WL Penn
WL NYU
WL UChi
??? Stanford
You should definitely retake. It appears that those with 170s rather than 169s (within this band of GPA) received 105k rather than 60k at UVA. One more question right could mean 45k. Two more questions and you'd be 50/50for H (for this cycle, and assuming next cycle is just as lax or more lax). Considering schools won't care if you score lower, you'd be absolutely insane not to retake. Best of luck.
I'm surprised you got $$ from UMich whereas bigeast03 didn't even make it in. Good resume/softs? Honestly I'd be so happy with 45k at Michigan.
With a 3.92 you're absolutely crazy to settle for $45k at Michigan.
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:36 pm
by woeisme
CourtneyJoann wrote:Thanks guys! I've decided to definitely retake. I just got a job as a Princeton Review LSAT prep instructor, so I'm hoping my score will increase now that I'll actually be studying more.
I thought you needed a 170 for TPR? Did they change their policy? That should definitely give you an opportunity to boost your score. What a win-win situation!
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:46 pm
by CourtneyJoann
They changed it down to a 165 I believe. I'm super excited!
Re: 3.89 GPA and 169 LSAT
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:13 am
by FloridaCoastalorbust
CourtneyJoann wrote:Hey! I'm a political Science and Psychology double major. I hold a leadership position in my service fraternity, and I volunteer for over 200 hours a semester, placing an emphasis on sober driving and aiding victims of domestic/sexual abuse. What do you think my chances are at $ and admissions to a top tier? Should I retake the LSAT and try to score higher? 169 was my score with less than a month to prepare, and I didn't prepare very thoroughly.
Thanks!
JW if you retook and if it went well? I commented on this thread and am a numbers twin! Best of luck
