Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=177973
Eh. Historically S prefers the higher GPA to the higher LSAT, URMs excluded. I would actually think H would bite more easily. The large class size allows for them to take some outliers if they're compelling enough as applicants.JamMasterJ wrote:T6 easily. Apply to HYS for lulz and b/c they may become intrgued. I can see S biting possibly
JamMasterJ wrote:T6 easily.
S is also more soft observant than H. She doesn't have H's minimum gpa, but the interesting softs can help ppl get into S even without the ridiculous gpa standards. Off the top of my head, I know of a military vet with a similar LSAT and a 3.6 that got S for this reason.Doorkeeper wrote:Eh. Historically S prefers the higher GPA to the higher LSAT, URMs excluded. I would actually think H would bite more easily. The large class size allows for them to take some outliers if they're compelling enough as applicants.JamMasterJ wrote:T6 easily. Apply to HYS for lulz and b/c they may become intrgued. I can see S biting possibly
Fair. Looking through LSN both S and H have taken students with 175+ and 3.6 before, so I guess it's a toss-up for OP.JamMasterJ wrote:S is also more soft observant than H. She doesn't have H's minimum gpa, but the interesting softs can help ppl get into S even without the ridiculous gpa standards. Off the top of my head, I know of a military vet with a similar LSAT and a 3.6 that got S for this reason.Doorkeeper wrote:Eh. Historically S prefers the higher GPA to the higher LSAT, URMs excluded. I would actually think H would bite more easily. The large class size allows for them to take some outliers if they're compelling enough as applicants.JamMasterJ wrote:T6 easily. Apply to HYS for lulz and b/c they may become intrgued. I can see S biting possibly
yeah, and I feel like his/her softs are more valued at Stanford, and thus would carry more weight in overcoming the gpaDoorkeeper wrote:Fair. Looking through LSN both S and H have taken students with 175+ and 3.6 before, so I guess it's a toss-up for OP.JamMasterJ wrote:S is also more soft observant than H. She doesn't have H's minimum gpa, but the interesting softs can help ppl get into S even without the ridiculous gpa standards. Off the top of my head, I know of a military vet with a similar LSAT and a 3.6 that got S for this reason.Doorkeeper wrote:Eh. Historically S prefers the higher GPA to the higher LSAT, URMs excluded. I would actually think H would bite more easily. The large class size allows for them to take some outliers if they're compelling enough as applicants.JamMasterJ wrote:T6 easily. Apply to HYS for lulz and b/c they may become intrgued. I can see S biting possibly