Page 1 of 1

167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:09 pm
by yankeedoodle
My top choice by a long shot is SMU. I know my numbers are fine, but I am still waiting on a LOR, which is promised to faxed "next week." I am only submitted two of them, so as far as I know I need to wait on it. Anyone know how big a role time plays here? If I am being paranoid, please tell me.

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:15 pm
by mlh1988
I don't think you have anything to worry about. I applied ED to SMU with numbers similar to yours and am not expecting to hear back from them until the end of January/early February. I would not worry if your app. goes complete next week after the LOR is faxed in.

Besides, you will have no problem getting in with your LSAT.

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:24 pm
by yankeedoodle
Great! I guess I am more concerned about getting some $$$ than actual admission. I called today, and the admissions person I spoke to seem pretty laid back about it, but who knows?

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:28 pm
by mlh1988
$ is an issue for me as well. SMU is where I will probably end up since I'm probably not getting into UT. Looking at the last cycle, people with our numbers are being awarded $76k over three years. Your numbers are in line to get the 76k according to LSN.

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:31 pm
by JamMasterJ
yeah, you should get 25k/yr unless you get a little more

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:35 pm
by Tiago Splitter
mlh1988 wrote:$ is an issue for me as well. SMU is where I will probably end up since I'm probably not getting into UT. Looking at the last cycle, people with our numbers are being awarded $76k over three years. Your numbers are in line to get the 76k according to LSN.
I applied around this time last year with slightly lower numbers than the OP and got the 76K scholly. OP should be in good shape.

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:10 pm
by UnamSanctam
I'm not trying to be obnoxious here, but is retaking the LSAT an option? But other than that, I can only second what Tiago and Jam said.

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:01 pm
by yankeedoodle
UnamSanctam wrote:I'm not trying to be obnoxious here, but is retaking the LSAT an option? But other than that, I can only second what Tiago and Jam said.

well, i am pretty confident in my 167, as 165 is the median, and a retake is out of the question at this point for fall 2012 enrollment. I was pretty much just concerned about timing.

Re: 167/3.55

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:42 pm
by yankeedoodle
So....just spoke with SMU admissions, who told me that LOR's are not even required because they "just take a quick glance at them," and to just send in my applications "even if there are no references." What in the world ha? Guess all my obsession was for naught. Submitting tonight.