176. Retake for Harvard? Forum
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:10 am
176. Retake for Harvard?
edit
Last edited by E3to on Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
- law4vus
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
I don't think scoring higher is going to help your chances at this point.
It will come down to whether they want to admit a 3.7 non-URM. They have a hard GPA floor for non-URMs but I don't think it's 100% that you won't get in. It's worth the app.
It will come down to whether they want to admit a 3.7 non-URM. They have a hard GPA floor for non-URMs but I don't think it's 100% that you won't get in. It's worth the app.
- MrPapagiorgio
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Yea. This.law4vus wrote:I don't think scoring higher is going to help your chances at this point.
It will come down to whether they want to admit a 3.7 non-URM. They have a hard GPA floor for non-URMs but I don't think it's 100% that you won't get in. It's worth the app.
-
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Yeah, I agree that the higher LSAT will probably not do much for you now, unfortunately. On the bright side, you have a great shot at tons of awesome schools. good luck.
- MachineLemon
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
I don't want to do the math. Is that a 3.70 or something higher? Could make a difference. Per LSN, a 177 seems to be necessary for softening the GPA floor from 3.8 to a 3.75. Of course, with the reduction in testing volume, who knows?
Still, trying to up your score from a 176 make put you under a counter-productive amount of stress. A lower score would just look silly, and you'd be applying later in the cycle. Don't retake, just apply and really polish that PS.
Good luck!
Still, trying to up your score from a 176 make put you under a counter-productive amount of stress. A lower score would just look silly, and you'd be applying later in the cycle. Don't retake, just apply and really polish that PS.
Good luck!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- law4vus
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Do what math? He listed his LSDAS GPA...TylerM wrote:I don't want to do the math. Is that a 3.70 or something higher? Could make a difference. Per LSN, a 177 seems to be necessary for softening the GPA floor from 3.8 to a 3.75. Of course, with the reduction in testing volume, who knows?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:10 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Unfortunately, 3.70. As earlier post mentioned, my sense is that the lower floor will be for URM.Is that a 3.70 or something higher?
As far as stress, my view right now is that I would regret not going for it, which compensates for the risk of a lower score. Since it is June LSAT, I plan to submit the applications within the first week they open (already have LoRs, PS, addendum, Resume).
Last edited by E3to on Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- law4vus
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
If you feel like you can get a higher score and want to, then you're right that it won't hurt you. I hope it pushes you over!E3to wrote:Unfortunately, 3.70. As earlier post mentioned, my sense is that the lower floor will be for URM.Is that a 3.70 or something higher?
As far as stress, my view right now is that I would regret not going for it, which compensates for the risk of a lower score. Since it is June LSAT, I plan to have the applications within the first week they open (already have LoRs, PS, addendum, Resume).
- MachineLemon
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Ahh, you're applying next cycle. Sorry if I missed that. Do remember that the June LSAT has the hardest curve. There may not even be a 177 on the conversion chart.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Now, that can't be true. Can it?TylerM wrote:Do remember that the June LSAT has the hardest curve.
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
http://lsatblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/ea ... -june.htmlNorth wrote:Now, that can't be true. Can it?TylerM wrote:Do remember that the June LSAT has the hardest curve.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:36 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
I have heard through the grapevine from a harvard law alumnus how they do the index score.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:33 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Was that harvard alumnus on the admissions committee?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:41 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
USCtrojan wrote:I have heard through the grapevine from a harvard law alumnus how they do the index score.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
I wonder how they account for URMs. By adding 5-12 points (depending on the kind of URM) to the original LSAT score and .1 or .2 to the GPA?
- KibblesAndVick
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:29 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
+1. If you look at LSN the non-URMs who get into Harvard with GPAs between 3.7 and 3.8 usually have LSAT scores above 176. This is the nonURMS from last cycle with LSATs between 175 and 180 and GPAs between 3.65 and 3.79.TylerM wrote:I don't want to do the math. Is that a 3.70 or something higher? Could make a difference. Per LSN, a 177 seems to be necessary for softening the GPA floor from 3.8 to a 3.75. Of course, with the reduction in testing volume, who knows?
Still, trying to up your score from a 176 make put you under a counter-productive amount of stress. A lower score would just look silly, and you'd be applying later in the cycle. Don't retake, just apply and really polish that PS.
Good luck!
If you really want Harvard there is an advantage to doing just a little bit better. Having said that, the difference between scoring a 176 and a 180 isn't studying or mastery of the material. If you were able to score a 176 you already understand all the material pretty damn well. It gets really random and your scores will bounce around. So getting a few extra points is going to take as much luck as it will hard work and talent.
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
You will have big money to MVPB and definitely in at CCN. I dont think a retake it worth it. Take the money and run at a great school
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/yobama/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jjb54/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/paris85/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/tweak/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/JDMD/jd
I doubt there's a set floor. However, it appears to help if you went to an Ivy or top 20 UG.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jjb54/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/paris85/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/tweak/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/JDMD/jd
I doubt there's a set floor. However, it appears to help if you went to an Ivy or top 20 UG.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:21 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
As an (almost) numbers twin I've had similar thoughts but I think 176 and 180 should perform almost identically. If Harvard's 75th stays at 176 wouldn't a 176 be identical to a 180 in the eyes of the adcomms? As I understand it, Harvard basically needs 1/4 of their class to be 176+ but it really doesn't matter if they are all 176s and no 180s. Medians and 75th would be the same. Now if the index calculation mentioned previously is accurate then it could slightly help you (maybe WL>admit) but retaking a 176 is absurd unless you are PTing 180 consistently. Just my .02 and I could be wrong. Also remember LSATs are down so hopefully they will be scooping up most 176+s to maintain the 75th.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:41 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
MattLiv12 wrote:176 and 180 should perform almost identically. If Harvard's 75th stays at 176 wouldn't a 176 be identical to a 180 in the eyes of the adcomms?
This.
This is also why I'm skeptical of the idea that adcoms use a formula which weights a 180 higher than a 178 (i.e., a formula which doesn't account for cut-offs for a school's 25, 50, and 75th percentiles).
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
You're above the LSAT median, no difference between 176 and 179 at that point.
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Doesn't this formula give waaaay more consideration to your undergrad than the data would suggest?USCtrojan wrote:I have heard through the grapevine from a harvard law alumnus how they do the index score.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
edit: for example, someone with a 4.0 and a 180 doesn't "jump right in" if their UG dips to pretty much anything below "1" in that formula? Come on now.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
Yeah I saw this too. Unless it's actually something like "between 0.95-1" this can't be right.seanPtheB wrote:Doesn't this formula give waaaay more consideration to your undergrad than the data would suggest?USCtrojan wrote:I have heard through the grapevine from a harvard law alumnus how they do the index score.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
edit: for example, someone with a 4.0 and a 180 doesn't "jump right in" if their UG dips to pretty much anything below "1" in that formula? Come on now.
- sunynp
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:06 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
This can't be right. Multiplying by zero means the total is zero. So does this mean they don't accept anyone from a non-ivy school because they can never make the threshold? Multiplying by one makes no difference to the number.USCtrojan wrote:I have heard through the grapevine from a harvard law alumnus how they do the index score.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
I think this is something someone made up - the last step makes no sense. Also, as noted above the formula makes no accounting for URM status.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
sunynp wrote:This can't be right. Multiplying by zero means the total is zero. So does this mean they don't accept anyone from a non-ivy school because they can never make the threshold? Multiplying by one makes no difference to the number.USCtrojan wrote:I have heard through the grapevine from a harvard law alumnus how they do the index score.
10 X Last 2 digits of LSAT + 2X GPA (Three digits, no decimal point) X Number between 0-1 based on strength of undergrad. You have to make a total of 1500 to jump right in. I don't think it is hard floor, but I am not sure
Example
10X 75 (175 LSAT) + 2X 350 (3.50 GPA) X 1 (Harvard) = 1450; below the 1500 threshold.
Heard from a reputable source, but no way to confirm truth to it.
I think this is something someone made up - the last step makes no sense. Also, as noted above the formula makes no accounting for URM status.
Order of operations... you only multiply the GPA by the 0-1 factor. LSAT is stand alone.
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: 176. Retake for Harvard?
for a 180/4.0, the school index would have to be ".87" on the 0-1 scale for autoadmit. Personally, I don't think strength of ugrad is a factor, based on my experiences and also LSN (we would see way more red dots in the top right).
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login