3.76/173 Forum
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
- descartesb4thehorse
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:03 am
Re: 3.76/173
Since Grizz et. al. seem to be asleep
- badfish
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:53 pm
Re: 3.76/173
I had very similar statistics and CCN were all very realistic possibilities (I got into Chicago and NYU an withdrew from Columbia before the decision came back). You've got an outside shot at H too.
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Deleted
Last edited by danielhay11 on Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:12 am
Re: 3.76/173
ITT someone thinks law schools care about softs that are not prestigious.danielhay11 wrote:Thanks, badfish!
Descartes, while not a "super soft," I do think TFA makes LSN less reliable. TFA won't add 5 points to an LSAT, but it is a way to make middle of the pack applicants stand out. My numbers say I'm a marginal candidate at HLS and it's peer schools; my question is whether TFA gives me a sufficient bump at those schools.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: 3.76/173
ITT someone thinks TFA is not a prestigious soft. Pretty sure it is shared common knowledge that TFA is an above average soft that, while as OP noted is not like +5 points on the LSAT, is something that would make a middle of the pack applicant stand out. I don't see it as much less super than being a military vet...(either up-playing TFA here or down-playing military service soft, whichever method one prefers)extremesplitter wrote:ITT someone thinks law schools care about softs that are not prestigious.danielhay11 wrote:Thanks, badfish!
Descartes, while not a "super soft," I do think TFA makes LSN less reliable. TFA won't add 5 points to an LSAT, but it is a way to make middle of the pack applicants stand out. My numbers say I'm a marginal candidate at HLS and it's peer schools; my question is whether TFA gives me a sufficient bump at those schools.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: 3.76/173
If you know this to be true, why don't you just look at LSN, and anywhere that you see a bunch of waitlists or a fairly even split between admits and denials, assume your chances lie on the more positive side?danielhay11 wrote:Thanks, badfish!
Descartes, while not a "super soft," I do think TFA makes LSN less reliable. TFA won't add 5 points to an LSAT, but it is a way to make middle of the pack applicants stand out. My numbers say I'm a marginal candidate at HLS and it's peer schools; my question is whether TFA gives me a sufficient bump at those schools.
btw, you're probably in at 2 or 3 of CCN, and you have an incredibly remote shot at H unless the LSAT median magically drops a point.
- redsoxfan2495
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:13 am
Re: 3.76/173
I don't really think CCN are reaches for you. I'd give you better than a 50% chance at all three. NYU is pretty close to a lock. Chicago is very possible, though it's the hardest to predict of the three due to its small class size. If you want to get in there try to apply as early as you can and tailor the app if possible. You're just above both medians at Columbia and you have the TFA thing going for you, so you have a fighting chance there too.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: 3.76/173
CCN on down to Vandy, plus any "strong regionals" (ex: UCLA, UT, Fordham, BU/BC, GW) if they're located in the market of your choice (it's always good to have some strong scholly offers to help with negotiating).
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.76/173
CRJamMasterJ wrote:If you know this to be true, why don't you just look at LSN, and anywhere that you see a bunch of waitlists or a fairly even split between admits and denials, assume your chances lie on the more positive side?danielhay11 wrote:Thanks, badfish!
Descartes, while not a "super soft," I do think TFA makes LSN less reliable. TFA won't add 5 points to an LSAT, but it is a way to make middle of the pack applicants stand out. My numbers say I'm a marginal candidate at HLS and it's peer schools; my question is whether TFA gives me a sufficient bump at those schools.
btw, you're probably in at 2 or 3 of CCN, and you have an incredibly remote shot at H unless the LSAT median magically drops a point.
But OP, I can pull a prediction out of my ass for you if you'd like.
- Bodhi_mind
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: 3.76/173
I think you'll get one of CCN and should take it
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vincanity1
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:40 pm
Re: 3.76/173
I think you'll get all 3 of CCN considering the drop in applicants, but I'm clearly biased. Good luck, doe
- Bodhi_mind
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Yeah I hope for that for both y'all. Go get it
vincanity1 wrote:I think you'll get all 3 of CCN considering the drop in applicants, but I'm clearly biased. Good luck, doe
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Thanks to both of you, and to everyone else who gave feedback.
Good luck, # twin. We'll have to check back and compare cycles (my LSN username is the same as it is here).
Good luck, # twin. We'll have to check back and compare cycles (my LSN username is the same as it is here).
Bodhi_mind wrote:Yeah I hope for that for both y'all. Go get it
vincanity1 wrote:I think you'll get all 3 of CCN considering the drop in applicants, but I'm clearly biased. Good luck, doe
- vincanity1
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:40 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Same. GLdanielhay11 wrote:Thanks to both of you, and to everyone else who gave feedback.
Good luck, # twin. We'll have to check back and compare cycles (my LSN username is the same as it is here).
Bodhi_mind wrote:Yeah I hope for that for both y'all. Go get it
vincanity1 wrote:I think you'll get all 3 of CCN considering the drop in applicants, but I'm clearly biased. Good luck, doe
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.76/173
I don't think TFA helps in the least. I know LSs try to make it sound that way (fee waiver for TFAers, etc) but I don't think it's a game changer or even a game adjuster. Yes, it's prestigious, but there's a big supply of TFA alums among LS applicants. A TON of them end up applying to LSs.
So yes, LSN will serve OP nicely.
So yes, LSN will serve OP nicely.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Based on the LSN data I've seen, this. Nowhere NEAR the results I've seen people pull with military service (esp. combat vets).IAFG wrote:I know LSs try to make it sound that way (fee waiver for TFAers, etc) but I don't think it's a game changer or even a game adjuster.
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Deleted
Last edited by danielhay11 on Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.76/173
I disagree with everything you just said.danielhay11 wrote:I would say I'm far more realistic of the value of TFA than others - some seem to think being in TFA is a one-way ticket to HYS, which it's not. But I also think it's pointless to argue it has no value whatsoever.Grizz wrote:Based on the LSN data I've seen, this. Nowhere NEAR the results I've seen people pull with military service (esp. combat vets).IAFG wrote:I know LSs try to make it sound that way (fee waiver for TFAers, etc) but I don't think it's a game changer or even a game adjuster.
I've heard it explained this way: law schools are looking for certain traits: maturity, leadership potential, interpersonal & communication skills, etc. Because law schools can't interview every applicant, they look for softs that screen for similar characteristics (TFA is one example, or consulting for a top firm like McKinsey is another). This also explains why military veterans have an even greater + factor than TFAers - the military both requires in greater amounts and strengthens to an exponential degree these characteristics.
This thread seems to confirm my thoughts: that TFA makes me a longshot at H, whereas I would have been a noshot without it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Flash
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:24 pm
Re: 3.76/173
They could. They don't because they don't really care.danielhay11 wrote:I would say I'm far more realistic of the value of TFA than others - some seem to think being in TFA is a one-way ticket to HYS, which it's not. But I also think it's pointless to argue it has no value whatsoever.Grizz wrote:Based on the LSN data I've seen, this. Nowhere NEAR the results I've seen people pull with military service (esp. combat vets).IAFG wrote:I know LSs try to make it sound that way (fee waiver for TFAers, etc) but I don't think it's a game changer or even a game adjuster.
I've heard it explained this way: law schools are looking for certain traits: maturity, leadership potential, interpersonal & communication skills, etc. Because law schools can't interview every applicant, they look for softs that screen for similar characteristics (TFA is one example, or consulting for a top firm like McKinsey is another). This also explains why military veterans have an even greater + factor than TFAers - the military both requires in greater amounts and strengthens to an exponential degree these characteristics.
This thread seems to confirm my thoughts: that TFA makes me a longshot at H, whereas I would have been a noshot without it.
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Deleted
Last edited by danielhay11 on Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.76/173
What statistics are you citing?
TFA does not signal maturity any more than any other two years of work experience. Schools can interview everyone, and Northwestern very nearly does. Someone with your numbers is a longshot at H anyway.
TFA does not signal maturity any more than any other two years of work experience. Schools can interview everyone, and Northwestern very nearly does. Someone with your numbers is a longshot at H anyway.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: 3.76/173
Are you saying that, based on a pretty good sample of LSN applicants, those with TFA have not over-performed their numbers? That'd be pretty good evidence against the more commonly shared belief that TFA = strong soft.IAFG wrote:What statistics are you citing?
TFA does not signal maturity any more than any other two years of work experience. Schools can interview everyone, and Northwestern very nearly does. Someone with your numbers is a longshot at H anyway.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login