3.6/146 Forum
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:38 pm
3.6/146
My wife just took a prep course with Kaplan and found out her score is 146. Does anyone think she will be able to get into Lewis and Clark with this score? She has a double major in accounting and business and is a minority. Should she take another course and re-take the LSAT? Any help would be appreciated.
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: 3.6/146
she absolutely absolutely MUST retake the LSAT. her score is not good, and it means bad things for her re law school prospects, the debt she will incur, and future employment prospects.union410 wrote:My wife just took a prep course with Kaplan and found out her score is 146. Does anyone think she will be able to get into Lewis and Clark with this score? She has a double major in accounting and business and is a minority. Should she take another course and re-take the LSAT? Any help would be appreciated.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:38 pm
Re: 3.6/146
Well she will be only applying to Lewis and Clark because we cannot leave the area. If she can't get in there she will have to postpone law school.
- twert
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: 3.6/146
depends what type of minority she is.
last year a urm got in with a 151 and a much worse gpa than your wife, the year before a urm got in with a 148 and a worse gpa than your wife. Its hard to say, but a 146 is pretty low.
last year a urm got in with a 151 and a much worse gpa than your wife, the year before a urm got in with a 148 and a worse gpa than your wife. Its hard to say, but a 146 is pretty low.
- twert
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: 3.6/146
isn't willamette in portland? she'd have a better shot there
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: 3.6/146
then retaking and scoring better means the possibility of scholarship money.union410 wrote:Well she will be only applying to Lewis and Clark because we cannot leave the area. If she can't get in there she will have to postpone law school.
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: 3.6/146
This.glitter178 wrote:then retaking and scoring better means the possibility of scholarship money.union410 wrote:Well she will be only applying to Lewis and Clark because we cannot leave the area. If she can't get in there she will have to postpone law school.
You can easily pull up 10 points, more with practice and picking up the Powerscore Bibles.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:38 pm
Re: 3.6/146
We've heard that Willamette is not a good law school. I don't want her to go to a school and then struggle finding a job right afterwards. I think she will just retake the test and hope for a better score. Any advice for that? She will not do the Kaplan course again.
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: 3.6/146
ResolutePear wrote:This.glitter178 wrote:then retaking and scoring better means the possibility of scholarship money.union410 wrote:Well she will be only applying to Lewis and Clark because we cannot leave the area. If she can't get in there she will have to postpone law school.
You can easily pull up 10 points, more with practice and picking up the Powerscore Bibles.
- calilaw
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:29 pm
Re: 3.6/146
She shouldn't retake without a lot more practice. Retaking and "hoping" for a better score is a terrible idea. She should pick a score she wants and then try to score several points higher than that on timed practice tests, and she shouldn't retake until she's confident that she can score within a certain range.union410 wrote:We've heard that Willamette is not a good law school. I don't want her to go to a school and then struggle finding a job right afterwards. I think she will just retake the test and hope for a better score. Any advice for that? She will not do the Kaplan course again.
Not retaking the Kaplan course is a good idea. She should instead focus on repetitive practice on her own time, with test prep books like the Bibles and timed practice with past LSATs.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:38 pm
Re: 3.6/146
Wow, thank you for all of the help. So applying with these numbers is a bad idea?
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: 3.6/146
Just to put it into perspective, and with all due respect:union410 wrote:Wow, thank you for all of the help. So applying with these numbers is a bad idea?
A 146 puts her around the 30th percentile. A hamster can Christmas-tree the test and get a better score.
It's definitely an issue with practice and technique. The Bibles and past LSATs will teach her these things.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:38 pm
Re: 3.6/146
If she applied and gets denied, will it hurt her for next year if she re-applies?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: 3.6/146
I don't see any point in doing that.. just retake and apply next cycle.. she will be much happier and in a lot less debt if she can do betterunion410 wrote:If she applied and gets denied, will it hurt her for next year if she re-applies?
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: 3.6/146
Yeah, even with getting in-BlueDiamond wrote:I don't see any point in doing that.. just retake and apply next cycle.. she will be much happier and in a lot less debt if she can do betterunion410 wrote:If she applied and gets denied, will it hurt her for next year if she re-applies?
it makes no sense if you can get a scholarship and/or into a better school. It just doesn't make sense.. especially if she's working.
- NorCalBruin
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:58 pm
Re: 3.6/146
This is hard to say and it depends on the school.If she applied and gets denied, will it hurt her for next year if she re-applies?
That said... if she applies and gets denied, but does nothing to improve her application (namely retaking the LSAT), then she will almost certainly get denied again. However, if she applies, gets denied, but then retakes and improves her LSAT score--her past rejection will probably not be a factor into their new admission decision.
I would advise your wife to retake the LSAT. Virtually everyone with a score below 150 can improve their score significantly with the right amount of studying and the right kind of studying. Given enough improvement, she might even get a scholarship. I would probably advise against Willamette though... and Lewis & Clark places much better in Portland.
- MattThiessen
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:06 pm
Re: 3.6/146
Apparently, Hamster's are pretty smart. I just tried to Christmas tree the October '96 LSAT and I got a 124. FAIL!ResolutePear wrote:Just to put it into perspective, and with all due respect:union410 wrote:Wow, thank you for all of the help. So applying with these numbers is a bad idea?
A 146 puts her around the 30th percentile. A hamster can Christmas-tree the test and get a better score.
It's definitely an issue with practice and technique. The Bibles and past LSATs will teach her these things.
OP, I say it can't hurt to apply. It will cost you maybe $50 (or however much the app fee is), so it can't do much harm.
Either way, your wife would be better off with a higher score. If she pulled a significantly higher score she may even get some good scholarships. I will +1 to purchasing the bibles and taking TONS of timed practice LSAT's.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:14 am
Re: 3.6/146
I'm a Willamette 1L. If you want my unfiltered thoughts on the school/subject, send me a private message.
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: 3.6/146
I don't know what you're trying to sell - but it sounds like a mighty good spirit. I'll buy 2.sneakpreview wrote:I'm a Willamette 1L. If you want my unfiltered thoughts on the school/subject, send me a private message.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: 3.6/146
Uhhhh, probably shouldn't go to L&C then.union410 wrote:We've heard that Willamette is not a good law school. I don't want her to go to a school and then struggle finding a job right afterwards.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:14 am
Re: 3.6/146
ResolutePear wrote:I don't know what you're trying to sell - but it sounds like a mighty good spirit. I'll buy 2.sneakpreview wrote:I'm a Willamette 1L. If you want my unfiltered thoughts on the school/subject, send me a private message.
Just trying to help people out. I can give a candid good/bad perspective.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login