2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:05 pm
George Washington and Georgetown PT ... worth the app. fee?
Top Law Schools
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
2.3/169/7 years working experience Forum
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=141053
Page 1 of 1
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:25 pm
Outlook not so good. I'd say no way in hell you get GTown. GW is almost a definite no if it weren't for you LSAT being above their 75th. Still almost definitely a no though.
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:13 pm
Maybe? I think the seven years of working soften the blow from your pretty sub-par GPA (no offense intended!).
Thought about Northwestern at all? You'd stand a better chance there, since they look more closely at professional experience.
Thought about Northwestern at all? You'd stand a better chance there, since they look more closely at professional experience.
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:15 pm
FTFYNZA wrote:Maybe? I think the seven years of working soften the blow from your pretty sub-par GPA (no offense intended!).
Thought about ED Northwestern at all? You'd stand a better chance there, since they look more closely at professional experience.
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:16 pm
Indeed, this is better advice.atresia wrote:FTFYNZA wrote:Maybe? I think the seven years of working soften the blow from your pretty sub-par GPA (no offense intended!).
Thought about ED Northwestern at all? You'd stand a better chance there, since they look more closely at professional experience.
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:29 pm
Not happening without a 170 at the very least. 172 would be better.NZA wrote:Indeed, this is better advice.atresia wrote:FTFYNZA wrote:Maybe? I think the seven years of working soften the blow from your pretty sub-par GPA (no offense intended!).
Thought about ED Northwestern at all? You'd stand a better chance there, since they look more closely at professional experience.
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:30 pm
Good point. Listen to this man, OP.FuManChusco wrote:Not happening without a 170 at the very least. 172 would be better.
Re: 2.3/169/7 years working experience
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:55 pm
atresia wrote:Good point. Listen to this man, OP.FuManChusco wrote:Not happening without a 170 at the very least. 172 would be better.