Page 1 of 1
chances
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:01 pm
by JenDarby
I went a little fee waiver crazy and applied to:
Cornell
UCLA
U Texas
USC
Washington U
U Illinois
BU
Notre Dame
U Iowa
BC
William & Mary
U Georgia
Fordham
George Mason
Lewis & Clark
Loyola LA
Should I throw in apps to anywhere else in hopes of $?
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:10 pm
by im_blue
I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:11 pm
by FuManChusco
Cornell, UCLA, UT are hard to predict. Gut tells me UT is a ding since you're OOS. Maybe in at one of Cornell/UCLA and in at USC. Probably in everywhere else.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:31 pm
by PinkCow
You're applying to Lewis and Clark and NOT UW?
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:37 pm
by JenDarby
chip3341 wrote:You're applying to Lewis and Clark and NOT UW?
UW was one of the few schools from 14-50 not kind enough to give me a fee waiver, I suppose I could email them and request one. I'm currently living in the NW, and not extremely interested in staying here though, so Lewis & Clark was somewhat of a $12 whim.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:40 pm
by ATR
im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:41 pm
by PinkCow
Yeah I'm not certain but I don't think UW gives fee waivers. Oh well, you've got a lot of other potential locks/good options on there.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:42 pm
by PinkCow
atresia wrote:im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:44 pm
by JenDarby
im_blue wrote:I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Do you think I have any shot at money at GW?
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:48 pm
by im_blue
JenDarby wrote:im_blue wrote:I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Do you think I have any shot at money at GW?
No, but you'll definitely get in, and might be able to negotiate with possible $ offers from BU/BC/Fordham.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:51 pm
by im_blue
chip3341 wrote:atresia wrote:im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
+1, Cardozo gives nearly full rides for those numbers.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:52 pm
by JenDarby
chip3341 wrote:atresia wrote:im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
She*
There is a lot of TLS hate for Cardozo it seems. I should probably throw this out there, I'm not biglaw or bust.
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:58 pm
by ATR
JenDarby wrote:chip3341 wrote:atresia wrote:im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
She*
There is a lot of TLS hate for Cardozo it seems. I should probably throw this out there, I'm not biglaw or bust.
I'm sure you're legal job or bust, though.