Page 1 of 1

167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:51 am
by DrVictorFreeze
.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:06 am
by Grizz
DrVictorFreeze wrote:Hey guys, first time poster. What do you think my chances are with a 3.25 / 167 with an econ major and applied math minor? I go to a top 25 private college. I am a white male and I have pretty standard softs (SGA, Greek, Work experience, Community Service stuff - not to many leadership positions though)

Cornell U (EA) 
Georgetown U
U Texas-Austin
Vanderbilt U
U Southern California

Washington U (MO)
George Washington U
U Illinois
U Minnesota-Twin Cities
Emory U
Boston U
Boston College
William and Mary
Fordham U

Washington & Lee U
U Colorado-Boulder (Instate)
George Mason U

Thanks
Unfortanately, being a sub-170 splitter is not ideal.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:12 am
by DrVictorFreeze
.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:16 am
by DrVictorFreeze
Thoughts on scholarship info would be great too

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:22 am
by Grizz
DrVictorFreeze wrote:Shit that was brutal, BC and Fordham were top choices
They're probably worth the apps, just for a long shot. USC on up are not, however.

edit: you still have a shot at Fordham. It's an outside shot though. Probably gonna get WL. Check out lawschoolnumbers.com

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:34 am
by Total Litigator
In all fairness, I think Rad is being on the "safe side." BC and Fordham can easily be replaced with waitlists.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:35 am
by whymeohgodno
Total Litigator wrote:In all fairness, I think Rad is being on the "safe side." Some of those cross-outs can easily be replaced with waitlists.
Waitlist should be considered a soft reject.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:35 am
by Total Litigator
True, and now I see that's the approach Rad was taking.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:37 am
by Grizz
whymeohgodno wrote:
Total Litigator wrote:In all fairness, I think Rad is being on the "safe side." Some of those cross-outs can easily be replaced with waitlists.
Waitlist should be considered a soft reject.
This.

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:11 pm
by kjadkins
I have similar numbers (slightly higher GPA) and am looking at a lot of the same schools, but I'm also a URM woman. Schools like Mason are good safeties, maybe pick a couple more just to be on the safe side (but maybe that's just me, the more nervous I'm get as I wait to heard, I'm PILING on extra safeties).

Re: 167 / 3.25

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:02 pm
by Grizz
kjadkins wrote:I have similar numbers (slightly higher GPA) and am looking at a lot of the same schools, but I'm also a URM woman. Schools like Mason are good safeties, maybe pick a couple more just to be on the safe side (but maybe that's just me, the more nervous I'm get as I wait to heard, I'm PILING on extra safeties).
URM? Enjoy T14.