Page 1 of 1

169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:24 pm
by molomloch
I graduated from a lower ranked UC school with a 3.95. Wondering what my chance is at UCLA, Berkeley, similar schools.

Also, can anyone recommend a decent place where I might have a chance at a full-ride?

Oh, and I've got a disciplinary record from Freshmen year (marijuana twice, destruction of property once). My only soft is spending a year studying in Western Europe and speaking a foreign language.

So far I've only been accepted to Texas, but really, really want to go to UCLA/Berkeley.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA NON-URM - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:40 pm
by duckmoney
I have very similar numbers and have already received some offers. PM me for more info.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:19 pm
by whymeohgodno
100% in at UCLA. Berk is probably a no go with weak softs.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:09 pm
by im_blue
Enjoy UCLA!

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:44 pm
by molomloch
I wish that were true Imblue, but I kinda doubt it.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:23 pm
by NewYorkPlease
I'd say In at UCLA with a shot at Boalt.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:33 pm
by im_blue
molomloch wrote:I wish that were true Imblue, but I kinda doubt it.
Why? You're almost certainly in at UCLA, likely with big $ too. Look how 3.85+/169 fared last year:

http://ucla.lawschoolnumbers.com/applic ... ,8&type=jd

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:06 pm
by molomloch
Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!? :evil:

Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:12 pm
by sophia.olive
molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!? :evil:

Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~
shut up its fine.

Put together a good app. U might be able to get full rides from the other UCs.

If you want a better shot at berk or stan join TFA or the peacecorp and retake the lsat at some time during.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:15 pm
by molomloch
Nice leg-warmers.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:37 pm
by HeavenWood
molomloch wrote:illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?
What posters?

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:41 pm
by DieAntwoord
Your criminal activity addendum sounds more like a good ps.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:44 pm
by DieAntwoord
molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!? :evil:

Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through
~
Austin is great!

And I know you were joking but I have never even seen a guy on a horse in texas.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:44 pm
by vanwinkle
I suspect in at both UCLA and Boalt. Enjoy California.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:45 pm
by molomloch
They weren't posters, they were like flyers related to the price of laundry detergent at the dormitory washroom...

I was drunk you see, but that wasn't part of my write-up. Just destruction of property / failure to identify myself. I didn't get any sanctions / etc for the incident as it was just stupid.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:49 pm
by DieAntwoord
molomloch wrote:They weren't posters, they were like flyers related to the price of laundry detergent at the dormitory washroom...

I was drunk you see, but that wasn't part of my write-up. Just destruction of property / failure to identify myself. I didn't get any sanctions / etc for the incident as it was just stupid.
Isnt there a lot of restrictions on the type of detergent you can use in cali/ or is that dish soap. They pollute. Maybe you were just ahead of your time.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:59 pm
by xyzzzzzzzz
sophia.olive wrote:
molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!? :evil:

Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~
shut up its fine.

Put together a good app. U might be able to get full rides from the other UCs.

If you want a better shot at berk or stan join TFA or the peacecorp and retake the lsat at some time during.
:roll: I hope this is a joke.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:01 pm
by Pleasye
molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!? :evil:
You're right. You're the first person to ever have to write an addendum explaining stupid things you did Freshman year. No one has ever had to do this before. Your very high GPA doesn't mean anything. Rethink law school.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:02 pm
by DieAntwoord
Image

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:01 am
by molomloch
LSpleaseee wrote:
molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!? :evil:
You're right. You're the first person to ever have to write an addendum explaining stupid things you did Freshman year. No one has ever had to do this before. Your very high GPA doesn't mean anything. Rethink law school.
Oh, I've rethought it many times. It's a rather foolish idea. What's your rock solid motivation / justification for applying to law school? "LSpleaseee", what a name..

Or was that just an attempt to call me stupid? That's not very nice, now is it "LSpleaseee"?

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:17 am
by Pleasye
molomloch wrote: Oh, I've rethought it many times. It's a rather foolish idea. What's your rock solid motivation / justification for applying to law school? "LSpleaseee", what a name..

Or was that just an attempt to call me stupid? That's not very nice, now is it "LSpleaseee"?
It's called sarcasm dude.

Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?

Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:29 pm
by molomloch
I got in at Georgetown.