Page 1 of 1

167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:58 am
by NorCalBruin
Chances at Cornell and UCLA? Or any school in t14 for that matter?


If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?

Downward grade trend. MIP of alcohol sophomore year. t25 undergrad (UCLA)

Thanks.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:32 am
by Grizz
Slim shot at Cornell. You should get into a couple of 15-18.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:36 am
by NorCalBruin
K. but

If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:37 am
by 005618502
NorCalBruin wrote:K. but

If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?
yes

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:38 am
by Grizz
NorCalBruin wrote:K. but

If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?
Best thing to do is call all these schools and ask. They may have different policies. I wouldn't ED at UCLA by the way. Not worth the debt.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:49 am
by 005618502
rad law wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:K. but

If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?
Best thing to do is call all these schools and ask. They may have different policies. I wouldn't ED at UCLA by the way. Not worth the debt.
UCLA is a great school, dont listen to anyone on here about T14 or Bust

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:00 am
by Grizz
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:K. but

If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?
Best thing to do is call all these schools and ask. They may have different policies. I wouldn't ED at UCLA by the way. Not worth the debt.
UCLA is a great school, dont listen to anyone on here about T14 or Bust
Never said I was T14 or bust, and I'm not at a T14 now. RC fail.

36% shot at biglaw back when the economy was good is definitely not worth sticker.

http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:22 pm
by 005618502
rad law wrote:
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:K. but

If I ED at UCLA, EA at Texas and Cornell, can I register for the december lsat and still have my applications reviewed?
Best thing to do is call all these schools and ask. They may have different policies. I wouldn't ED at UCLA by the way. Not worth the debt.
UCLA is a great school, dont listen to anyone on here about T14 or Bust
Never said I was T14 or bust, and I'm not at a T14 now. RC fail.

36% shot at biglaw back when the economy was good is definitely not worth sticker.

http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf
I have heard UCLA places well in LA/OC so if thats where you want to stay then its not a bad choice. What school range are you at? I was under the impression by your profile that you were applying this year and in undergrad at the moment?

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:42 pm
by Grizz
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote: 36% shot at biglaw back when the economy was good is definitely not worth sticker.

http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf
I have heard UCLA places well in LA/OC so if thats where you want to stay then its not a bad choice. What school range are you at? I was under the impression by your profile that you were applying this year and in undergrad at the moment?
It does place well. But even these stats are largely pre-economic implosion. California is in deep shit. There are many fewer jobs that pay enough to pay off sticker in a timely manner. That's why it's just not worth it.

I'm at Vandy with a little over half scholarship. And I'm scared shitless.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:45 pm
by 005618502
rad law wrote:
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote: 36% shot at biglaw back when the economy was good is definitely not worth sticker.

http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf
I have heard UCLA places well in LA/OC so if thats where you want to stay then its not a bad choice. What school range are you at? I was under the impression by your profile that you were applying this year and in undergrad at the moment?
It does place well. But even these stats are largely pre-economic implosion. California is in deep shit. There are many fewer jobs that pay enough to pay off sticker in a timely manner. That's why it's just not worth it.

I'm at Vandy with a little over half scholarship. And I'm scared shitless.
Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:46 pm
by Patriot1208
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote:
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote: 36% shot at biglaw back when the economy was good is definitely not worth sticker.

http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf
I have heard UCLA places well in LA/OC so if thats where you want to stay then its not a bad choice. What school range are you at? I was under the impression by your profile that you were applying this year and in undergrad at the moment?
It does place well. But even these stats are largely pre-economic implosion. California is in deep shit. There are many fewer jobs that pay enough to pay off sticker in a timely manner. That's why it's just not worth it.

I'm at Vandy with a little over half scholarship. And I'm scared shitless.
Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH

Also, acting like you shouldn't be scared because you can graduate top 1/3 and be ok is terribly ignorant. No one knows if they will be top 1/3. They all hope so, they all work hard, but no one really knows.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:49 pm
by 005618502
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH

Also, acting like you shouldn't be scared because you can graduate top 1/3 and be ok is terribly ignorant. No one knows if they will be top 1/3. They all hope so, they all work hard, but no one really knows.
I thought after your first year you should know where (around) in the class you are placing?

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:51 pm
by Patriot1208
jt1341 wrote:
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH

Also, acting like you shouldn't be scared because you can graduate top 1/3 and be ok is terribly ignorant. No one knows if they will be top 1/3. They all hope so, they all work hard, but no one really knows.
I thought after your first year you should know where (around) in the class you are placing?
Yes, you should, Rad is a 1L. And every OL and 1L should be scared shitless about finding a job unless they are at HYS and maybe CCN.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:51 pm
by Grizz
jt1341 wrote: Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
From all I've hear, top 25% is fine here and can get biglaw. Doesn't mean I'm not scared.

And look at the chart. Patriot's right.
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:55 pm
by 005618502
rad law wrote:
jt1341 wrote: Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
From all I've hear, top 25% is fine here and can get biglaw. Doesn't mean I'm not scared.

And look at the chart. Patriot's right.
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH
Get all A's and you have nothing to worrry about!!

No but seriously, i thought that those charts were only biglaw and didnt include many secondary market positions like many of the markets in Cali..... OC, San diego, long beach, sac, other cities....

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:58 pm
by Patriot1208
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote:
jt1341 wrote: Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
From all I've hear, top 25% is fine here and can get biglaw. Doesn't mean I'm not scared.

And look at the chart. Patriot's right.
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH
Get all A's and you have nothing to worrry about!!

No but seriously, i thought that those charts were only biglaw and didnt include many secondary market positions like many of the markets in Cali..... OC, San diego, long beach, sac, other cities....
That is the NLJ250. Which is the 250 biggest firms in the country. Outside of those firms, and including some of those firms, there are very few other firms that pay anywhere close to market. There are some small boutiques that do, but those are rare. For most purposes, that is the best indicator of the amount of people getting market (six figure) jobs from each school. Most of the rest either got government jobs or low paying (40k) shitlaw jobs.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:01 pm
by 005618502
Patriot1208 wrote:
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote:
jt1341 wrote: Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
From all I've hear, top 25% is fine here and can get biglaw. Doesn't mean I'm not scared.

And look at the chart. Patriot's right.
Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH
Get all A's and you have nothing to worrry about!!

No but seriously, i thought that those charts were only biglaw and didnt include many secondary market positions like many of the markets in Cali..... OC, San diego, long beach, sac, other cities....
That is the NLJ250. Which is the 250 biggest firms in the country. Outside of those firms, and including some of those firms, there are very few other firms that pay anywhere close to market. There are some small boutiques that do, but those are rare. For most purposes, that is the best indicator of the amount of people getting market (six figure) jobs from each school. Most of the rest either got government jobs or low paying (40k) shitlaw jobs.
oo ok got it. I didnt know all in the NLJ250 paid market... i thought many paid less?

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:02 pm
by plenipotentiary
Maybe ED to Michigan? You're above their GPA median.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:03 pm
by hipstermafia
jt1341 wrote:Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
I know this is difficult to believe, but not even rad law can predict the future.

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:03 pm
by Patriot1208
jt1341 wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
jt1341 wrote:
rad law wrote:Vandy places better than both UT and UCLA, by a good amount. HTH
Get all A's and you have nothing to worrry about!!

No but seriously, i thought that those charts were only biglaw and didnt include many secondary market positions like many of the markets in Cali..... OC, San diego, long beach, sac, other cities....
That is the NLJ250. Which is the 250 biggest firms in the country. Outside of those firms, and including some of those firms, there are very few other firms that pay anywhere close to market. There are some small boutiques that do, but those are rare. For most purposes, that is the best indicator of the amount of people getting market (six figure) jobs from each school. Most of the rest either got government jobs or low paying (40k) shitlaw jobs.
oo ok got it. I didnt know all in the NLJ250 paid market... i thought many paid less?
Refer to the underlined

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:27 pm
by 005618502
RC was my worst section :p haha

Re: 167 / 3.80

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:01 pm
by Grizz
hipstermafia wrote:
jt1341 wrote:Hmmmm well i dont want to get into the whole UT>UCLA>>Vandy BUT....
If you graduate top 25% (i dont know if thats reasonable for you) then wont you be okay? I have heard those graduating up to about top 1/3rd r doing okay. But im sure you would knwo more then most at the moment
I know this is difficult to believe, but not even rad law can predict the future.
<3 you hipstermafia