Page 1 of 1
3.63/167
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:53 pm
by fish tacos
What range should I shoot for with a 3.63 ugpa and a 160 and 167 for LSAT scores? Do I have a shot at the lower T14 with an ED? I'm not an URM and I would call my soft factors average. On LSP I get a "Consider" for much of the bottom T14 schools with percentage ratings around 40%... in the experience of the TLS community could an ED bump this to better than 50-50 odds? Thanks in advance.
Re: 3.63/160/167
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:07 pm
by Grizz
fish tacos wrote:What range should I shoot for with a 3.63 ugpa and a 160 and 167 for LSAT scores? Do I have a shot at the lower T14 with an ED? I'm not an URM and I would call my soft factors average. On LSP I get a "Consider" for much of the bottom T14 schools with percentage ratings around 40%... in the experience of the TLS community could an ED bump this to better than 50-50 odds? Thanks in advance.
You're only shot at T14 is Cornell, and they don't ED. Expect to have a decent shot at schools WUSTL on down. Dicey at 15-18.
Re: 3.63/167
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:31 pm
by fish tacos
Thanks for your advice. Do you think having the 160 on the report is a significant disadvantage? Without it, do you think I would have a 50-50 shot at Duke/Uva/Gtown applying ED? I guess that's a moot point, seeing as how it's there anyway...
I know the general rundown of schools either averaging, taking the top score, or "looking at every score to get a complete picture of a candidate's performance." Do any experienced TLS'ers out there suggest an addendum for the score increase? I just don't want to seem like I'm making excuses.
Thanks in advance everyone.
Re: 3.63/160/167
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:48 pm
by Grizz
fish tacos wrote:Thanks for your advice. Do you think having the 160 on the report is a significant disadvantage? Without it, do you think I would have a 50-50 shot at Duke/Uva/Gtown applying ED? I guess that's a moot point, seeing as how it's there anyway...
I know the general rundown of schools either averaging, taking the top score, or "looking at every score to get a complete picture of a candidate's performance." Do any experienced TLS'ers out there suggest an addendum for the score increase? I just don't want to seem like I'm making excuses.
Thanks in advance everyone.
The 160 doesn't hurt, as most schools in reality take the highest LSAT; it's your GPA and LSAT being below medians that hurts.
Don't write an addendum if the only thing you did was study more.
Re: 3.63/160/167
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:30 am
by im_blue
No shot at T14, UCLA, and Vandy, but good shot at everywhere else.