160 LSAT 3.1 GPA Forum

[Maddy27]

What schools in LOS ANGELES do you think I have a good chance of getting accepted to ?

with : 160 LSAT , 3.1 UGPA , and 5 years of work experience managing a Law firm.

Thank you.

[Grizz]

What schools in LOS ANGELES do you think I have a good chance of getting accepted to ?

with : 160 LSAT , 3.1 UGPA , and 5 years of work experience managing a Law firm.

Thank you.

Why do you need to be IN Los Angeles?

Regardless, you need to retake to make up for your 3.1 GPA.

[lawschool2014]

no where worth going to with your sub-par GPA and LSAT. You must retake, a 3.1 GPA is going to screw you over. You may be able to swing a t30 if you get a 170+, but even then, its doubtful. Seriously consider if you really want to go to law school.

[Danteshek]

What schools in LOS ANGELES do you think I have a good chance of getting accepted to ?

with : 160 LSAT , 3.1 UGPA , and 5 years of work experience managing a Law firm.

Thank you.

You have a shot at Loyola (50/50). You are in at Southwestern.

[sibley]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0#p2939710

I'm wondering why you keep posting and why your numbers keep changing.

[StrictlyLiable]

Note she said has been scoring "175+" on pts, not on the official test. Perhaps the 160 is a previous score. Just saying.

[sibley]

Note she said has been scoring "175+" on pts, not on the official test. Perhaps the 160 is a previous score. Just saying.

Maybe. either way, too many posts on the topic. all details should have been disclosed in one post. how else can we give any decent advice?

[czelede]

You may be able to swing a t30 if you get a 170+, but even then, its doubtful. Seriously consider if you really want to go to law school.

I disagree with this. A 172+ will get OP into NU ED, and possibly one of MVP as well (ED).

[nematoad]

You may be able to swing a t30 if you get a 170+, but even then, its doubtful. Seriously consider if you really want to go to law school.

I disagree with this. A 172+ will get OP into NU ED, and possibly one of MVP as well (ED).

+1

[OG Loc]

You may be able to swing a t30 if you get a 170+, but even then, its doubtful. Seriously consider if you really want to go to law school.

I disagree with this. A 172+ will get OP into NU ED, and possibly one of MVP as well (ED).

And would be an auto admit at WUSTL, Indiana, Illinois, Minn.

[Kilpatrick]

You may be able to swing a t30 if you get a 170+, but even then, its doubtful. Seriously consider if you really want to go to law school.

I disagree with this. A 172+ will get OP into NU ED, and possibly one of MVP as well (ED).

+1

+2

Lawschool2014, you are seriously underestimating how much a 170+ LSAT will make up for a low GPA.

[Danteshek]

Is it that hard to answer the OP's question?

(1) OP did not ask what schools she could get into if she had a better LSAT score.

(2) OP did not ask whether it would be worth attending a school in Los Angeles she could get into with those numbers.

[Kilpatrick]

If somebody asks "where should I eat Pizza Hut or Dominos?" I don't think there's anything wrong with suggesting different, better, pizza places.

[Danteshek]

If somebody asks "where should I eat Pizza Hut or Dominos?" I don't think there's anything wrong with suggesting different, better, pizza places.

Actually, there is. You are just being a dick. You clearly have no knowledge of the schools he would be considering.

I'm not sure you can fault someone for getting a 160 on the LSAT. It is 84th Percentile (or so).

[Jack Smirks]

OP, how the fuck do you go from a 175 to a 160? You're obviously bullshitting in one of these posts.

[nematoad]

Is it that hard to answer the OP's question?

(1) OP did not ask what schools she could get into if she had a better LSAT score.

(2) OP did not ask whether it would be worth attending a school in Los Angeles she could get into with those numbers.

I believe you already answered that question sir. OP your chances at pepperdine and loyola are average to slim. Usc ucla.. none. Southwestern is your best bet